SUGGESTON FOR: HIGH END MAIL SERVER

nilesh vaghela nileshj.vaghela at gmail.com
Fri Feb 16 17:01:24 UTC 2007


Thanx again for your suggestion.

Let me try and test the things.

On 2/16/07, Ray Van Dolson <rvandolson at esri.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 08:57:57AM -0500, nilesh vaghela wrote:
> > Thanx you all, for the answer.
> >
> > My choice still Postfix or Qmail.
> > I am still not sure about Cyrus or Coriuor.
> >
> > Let me do some performance testing on both the server will let you know
> the
> > result.
> >
> > I am not sure about the time.
>
> Both qmail and Postfix are great.  The ISP I worked at used qmail, and
> although it took a bit of getting used to (the djb way of laying things
> out is
> a bit non-intuitive when compared to your traditional setup), it's
> extremely
> powerful.  Using something like qmailtoaster is the way to go IMO,
> especially
> if you'll be doing the same install on a bunch of machines for HA.  It
> _is_ a
> pain recompiling in patches every time you need a feature or need to
> upgrade
> something; you have to track all that.  RPM's make life much easier.
>
> I'd say in the end go with whichever gives you the performance you need
> and
> you are more comfortable managing.  Postfix I think will be easier to
> manage
> initially--qmail will have a bit of a learning curve.
>
> qmailtoaster comes with Courier RPM's that work fine.  I've heard Cyrus is
> the
> fastest in the IMAP world though, so probably worth a serious look.
>
> Ray
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>



-- 
Nilesh Vaghela
ElectroMech
Redhat Channel Partner and Training Partner
74, Nalanda Complex, Satellite Rd, Ahmedabad
25, The Emperor, Fatehgunj, Baroda.
www.electromech.info



More information about the redhat-list mailing list