Second ethernet without router?

[Troy Amburg]

You might want make sure you didn't set the default route for the  
entire host to 192.168.1.1.

On Nov 28, 2007, at 3:39 PM, Steven Buehler wrote:

> 	I have several servers running on public IP's all on their eth0's.
> They of course have a router -> switch -> servers.  I would like to  
> setup a
> local net on the eth1's of each server, but I don't have a router.   
> Just the
> switch and servers.  I must have goofed something up pretty bad  
> because I
> setup the eth1 on one of the servers to have an IP of 192.168.1.1,  
> Mask of
> 255.255.255.0 and gateway of 192.168.1.1.  The second server was an  
> IP of
> 192.168.1.2, Mask of 255.255.255.0 and gateway of 192.168.1.1.   
> After doing
> an "ifup eth1" on each machine, the public IP's on the eth0's can't be
> reached any more either.  Do I need to have a separate router and  
> switch to
> do this?
>
> Thanks
> Steve
>
> -- 
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list