redhat-list Digest, WU-FTPD problem
Masamy, Juda (SSO - Rehovot)
juda.masamy at hp.com
Tue Oct 23 06:58:52 UTC 2007
Hi All,
I have a problem with wu-ftpd I cannot upload files that are bigger than
2G I have fc6 Linux.
Please help!
Tnx
Juda
UNIX is user friendly; it is just picky who its friends are!
-----Original Message-----
From: redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com
[mailto:redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of
redhat-list-request at redhat.com
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 6:00 PM
To: redhat-list at redhat.com
Subject: redhat-list Digest, Vol 44, Issue 23
Send redhat-list mailing list submissions to
redhat-list at redhat.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
redhat-list-request at redhat.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
redhat-list-owner at redhat.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of redhat-list digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: RAS and LiveCD (dbrett at tcn.net)
2. Re: RAS and LiveCD (Mohd Irwan Jamaluddin)
3. Query on NTP (Ravi Shanmugam)
4. Re: Query on NTP (Mridul Dutta)
5. RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S (Sorin Srbu)
6. RE: redhat-list Digest, Vol 44, Issue 21 (Sorin Srbu)
7. RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S (Johan Booysen)
8. RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S (Sorin Srbu)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:39:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: dbrett at tcn.net
Subject: Re: RAS and LiveCD
To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710211337540.23548 at mail4.tcn.net>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Thanks to Sorin, this message was getting lost due to a server time
error.
I am resubmitting hoping to get some insite.
thanks
david
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, dbrett at tcn.net wrote:
> I was looking at buying a RAS, but could not find one I liked at a
price I
> could afford. I was deciding to build one from and old computer I had
lying
> around. The more I looked into it I though I would build a LiveCD to
do
> this. I found a number of sites which talk about how to build LiveCD,
but I
> am in need of information on how to build a RAS which windows boxes
can
> connect too as well. The second thing I need help on is modifying
LiveCD.
>
> thanks
> david
>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:00:58 +0800
From: "Mohd Irwan Jamaluddin" <mij at irwan.name>
Subject: Re: RAS and LiveCD
To: redhat-list at redhat.com
Message-ID:
<b3d998b00710212000r75b62d0co41d57f03bc24ba1 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On 1/7/02, dbrett at tcn.net <dbrett at tcn.net> wrote:
> I was looking at buying a RAS, but could not find one I liked at a
price I
> could afford. I was deciding to build one from and old computer I had
> lying around. The more I looked into it I though I would build a
LiveCD
> to do this. I found a number of sites which talk about how to build
> LiveCD, but I am in need of information on how to build a RAS which
> windows boxes can connect too as well. The second thing I need help
on is
> modifying LiveCD.
>
What do you mean by RAS? Is it Red Hat Advanced Server?
Some good articles on building Live CD,
http://www.livecdlist.com/wiki/index.php/LiveCD_Creation_Resources
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7246
--
Regards,
Mohd Irwan Jamaluddin
Web: http://www.irwan.name/
Blog: http://blog.irwan.name/
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:49:48 +0530
From: "Ravi Shanmugam" <ravi.shanmugam at sasken.com>
Subject: Query on NTP
To: <redhat-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <6025AF6D092FBF4B8C4813E924C8D7450C45A5 at EXGZ02.sasken.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi,
I am using a client which has access to 2 different servers with NTP
deamon running in them.
Can I configure my client to sync the time with these 2 servers like
server server1
server server2
What will happen if both the servers have different time? To what time
my server will sync?
Thanks. Your reply will be very helpful to me.
Regds,
Ravi R.S
SASKEN BUSINESS DISCLAIMER
-------------------------
This message may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged
information. In
case you are not the original intended Recipient of the message, you
must not, directly or
indirectly, use, Disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this
message and you are
requested to delete it and inform the sender. Any views expressed in
this message are
those of the individual sender unless otherwise stated. Nothing
contained in this message
shall be construed as an offer or acceptance of any offer by Sasken
Communication
Technologies Limited ("Sasken") unless sent with that express intent and
with due
authority of Sasken. Sasken has taken enough precautions to prevent the
spread of
viruses. However the company accepts no liability for any damage caused
by any virus
transmitted by this email
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:57:11 +0530
From: "Mridul Dutta" <i.mridul at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Query on NTP
To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID:
<a35542d0710212327o14168f5bg247635d0934d1452 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
hi ,
TIme server will sync from Primary server.
ex: from server 1
On 10/22/07, Ravi Shanmugam <ravi.shanmugam at sasken.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using a client which has access to 2 different servers with NTP
> deamon running in them.
> Can I configure my client to sync the time with these 2 servers like
>
> server server1
> server server2
>
> What will happen if both the servers have different time? To what time
> my server will sync?
>
> Thanks. Your reply will be very helpful to me.
>
> Regds,
> Ravi R.S
>
> SASKEN BUSINESS DISCLAIMER
> -------------------------
> This message may contain confidential, proprietary or legally
privileged
> information. In
> case you are not the original intended Recipient of the message, you
must
> not, directly or
> indirectly, use, Disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this
> message and you are
> requested to delete it and inform the sender. Any views expressed in
this
> message are
> those of the individual sender unless otherwise stated. Nothing
contained
> in this message
> shall be construed as an offer or acceptance of any offer by Sasken
> Communication
> Technologies Limited ("Sasken") unless sent with that express intent
and
> with due
> authority of Sasken. Sasken has taken enough precautions to prevent
the
> spread of
> viruses. However the company accepts no liability for any damage
caused by
> any virus
> transmitted by this email
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subjectunsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
--
Best Regards
Mridul Dutta
IBM India Pvt Ltd, Embassy Golf Links,
Bangalore.
Email:- mriddutt at in.ibm.com
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 08:50:34 +0200
From: "Sorin Srbu" <sorin.srbu at orgfarm.uu.se>
Subject: RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S
To: "'General Red Hat Linux discussion list'" <redhat-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <D216FFA163A947E7AD65B7FF31210989 at orgfarm.uu.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Johan Booysen <> scribbled on Friday, October 19, 2007 6:28 PM:
You should do fine with CentOS5 as a replacement for RHEL5. CentOS is
binary
compatible, a clone if you want, of RHEL. Only real difference (and the
one I
can care slightly about) is that CentOS has had all the RHEL-logos etc
stripped and that it uses yum for updating instead of RHEL's up2date and
the
RHN.
I use CentOS myself for trying out stuff before deploying to our RHEL3/4
machines. So far so good. I also like the fact that CentOS is supported
as
long as RHEL is. Redhat will support v5 until 2011?), and since CentOS
is
basically the same thing as RHEL, the same will be true for support and
updates for CentOS.
See this thread on the CentOS forums, it might help you decide:
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=3107&forum=35
. 8-)
[off-track]
I used Fedora before to try out stuff before, but thought the fast
update-cycle was a bit too bleeding edge. I searched around a while and
came
across CentOS and haven't looked back since.
[on-track]
HTH.
> Matt,
>
> Good question, and a very valid point. But anyway, this box is kind
of
> a test-lab Oracle server, and needs to be RHEL5 for that purpose. I
> believe it will be pretty heavily used, so virtualizing it won't
happen
> - I'll bet my last penny on that, and on the Springboks, by the way!
:)
>
>
> I think the next thing to do is to perhaps flash the Adaptec adapter's
> BIOS to a newer version, and then see if the driver will load...I'm
> pretty certain that I've exhausted all other options for now.
>
> Will see what the boss says on Monday...
>
> Thanks very much for your reply.
>
> Johan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com
> [mailto:redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Matt
> Sent: 19 October 2007 17:18
> To: 'General Red Hat Linux discussion list'
> Subject: RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S
>
> Perhaps this is not the answer you are looking for, but maybe you can
> install another distro (Fedora or an older CENTOS) to get driver
> support.
> Also, could using a virtual server work? I am just wondering if you
can
> place something like CENT as the host OS then run VMWare and maybe
> create a virtual machine with RHEL5? Perhaps this VM will not require
> direct hardware support for the controller? You might be able to
> virtualize part of your infrastructure as well and run a legacy OS
which
> supports your controller - then, include this box in the virtual
> infrastructure.
>
> Maybe the real question is why is it that you need to run RHEL5 on a 4
> year old box? I am not saying there is a problem with it, but is it
> essential that REHL5 is run on this one?
>
> Just some thoughts for you...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com
> [mailto:redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com]
> On Behalf Of Andrew Bacchi
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 11:41 AM
> To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
> Subject: Re: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S
>
> I hope you've already solved this problem. Have you checked the
Adaptec
> web site for a Linux driver? If anyone has one, it would be the OEM.
>
>
> Johan Booysen wrote:
>> I urgently need advice on this: I need to install RHEL5 on a server
>> that is probably about 4 years old. It contains an Adaptec SCSI RAID
>> 2000S adapter, and there is no driver available that I can track down
on
>> short notice (and none included on the RHEL5 discs). Anaconda does
not
>> detect any disks on the server during installation.
>>
>> Anyone know what my best bet is to get around this, or where to find
a
>> driver that will work?
>>
>> Thanks very much.
>>
>> Johan
>
> --
>
> veritatis simplex oratio est
> -Seneca
>
> Andrew Bacchi
> Systems Programmer
> Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
> phone: 518.276.6415 fax: 518.276.2809
>
> http://www.rpi.edu/~bacchi/
>
> --
>
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.0/1077 - Release Date:
> 10/18/2007
> 9:54 AM
>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.0/1077 - Release Date:
> 10/18/2007
> 9:54 AM
>
>
> --
>
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 08:51:53 +0200
From: "Sorin Srbu" <sorin.srbu at orgfarm.uu.se>
Subject: RE: redhat-list Digest, Vol 44, Issue 21
To: "'General Red Hat Linux discussion list'" <redhat-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <154EE9EFA1234C98844A58BD171A5CA9 at orgfarm.uu.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Masamy, Juda (SSO - Rehovot) <> scribbled on Sunday, October 21, 2007
10:57
AM:
What filesystems do you use on your remote and local machine?
> I have a problem with wu-ftpd I cannot upload file that is more than
2G
> I have fc6 Linux.
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 09:08:46 +0100
From: "Johan Booysen" <johan at matrix-data.co.uk>
Subject: RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S
To: <sorin.srbu at orgfarm.uu.se>, "General Red Hat Linux discussion
list" <redhat-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID:
<3D48C842BD295548968848572119008C0900E4 at MDMS01.matrix-data.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I don't think management over here will go for CentOS. Besides, if
CentOS is the same as Red Hat, I assume that it too will not have the
driver I need..?
Thanks for the suggestion, though!
Johan
-----Original Message-----
From: redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com
[mailto:redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Sorin Srbu
Sent: 22 October 2007 07:51
To: 'General Red Hat Linux discussion list'
Subject: RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S
Johan Booysen <> scribbled on Friday, October 19, 2007 6:28 PM:
You should do fine with CentOS5 as a replacement for RHEL5. CentOS is
binary compatible, a clone if you want, of RHEL. Only real difference
(and the one I can care slightly about) is that CentOS has had all the
RHEL-logos etc stripped and that it uses yum for updating instead of
RHEL's up2date and the RHN.
I use CentOS myself for trying out stuff before deploying to our RHEL3/4
machines. So far so good. I also like the fact that CentOS is supported
as long as RHEL is. Redhat will support v5 until 2011?), and since
CentOS is basically the same thing as RHEL, the same will be true for
support and updates for CentOS.
See this thread on the CentOS forums, it might help you decide:
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=3107&forum=35
. 8-)
[off-track]
I used Fedora before to try out stuff before, but thought the fast
update-cycle was a bit too bleeding edge. I searched around a while and
came across CentOS and haven't looked back since.
[on-track]
HTH.
> Matt,
>
> Good question, and a very valid point. But anyway, this box is kind
> of a test-lab Oracle server, and needs to be RHEL5 for that purpose.
> I believe it will be pretty heavily used, so virtualizing it won't
> happen
> - I'll bet my last penny on that, and on the Springboks, by the way!
> :)
>
>
> I think the next thing to do is to perhaps flash the Adaptec adapter's
> BIOS to a newer version, and then see if the driver will load...I'm
> pretty certain that I've exhausted all other options for now.
>
> Will see what the boss says on Monday...
>
> Thanks very much for your reply.
>
> Johan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com
> [mailto:redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Matt
> Sent: 19 October 2007 17:18
> To: 'General Red Hat Linux discussion list'
> Subject: RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S
>
> Perhaps this is not the answer you are looking for, but maybe you can
> install another distro (Fedora or an older CENTOS) to get driver
> support.
> Also, could using a virtual server work? I am just wondering if you
> can place something like CENT as the host OS then run VMWare and maybe
> create a virtual machine with RHEL5? Perhaps this VM will not require
> direct hardware support for the controller? You might be able to
> virtualize part of your infrastructure as well and run a legacy OS
> which supports your controller - then, include this box in the virtual
> infrastructure.
>
> Maybe the real question is why is it that you need to run RHEL5 on a 4
> year old box? I am not saying there is a problem with it, but is it
> essential that REHL5 is run on this one?
>
> Just some thoughts for you...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com
> [mailto:redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com]
> On Behalf Of Andrew Bacchi
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 11:41 AM
> To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
> Subject: Re: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S
>
> I hope you've already solved this problem. Have you checked the
> Adaptec web site for a Linux driver? If anyone has one, it would be
the OEM.
>
>
> Johan Booysen wrote:
>> I urgently need advice on this: I need to install RHEL5 on a server
>> that is probably about 4 years old. It contains an Adaptec SCSI RAID
>> 2000S adapter, and there is no driver available that I can track down
>> on short notice (and none included on the RHEL5 discs). Anaconda
>> does not detect any disks on the server during installation.
>>
>> Anyone know what my best bet is to get around this, or where to find
>> a driver that will work?
>>
>> Thanks very much.
>>
>> Johan
>
> --
>
> veritatis simplex oratio est
> -Seneca
>
> Andrew Bacchi
> Systems Programmer
> Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
> phone: 518.276.6415 fax: 518.276.2809
>
> http://www.rpi.edu/~bacchi/
>
> --
>
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.0/1077 - Release Date:
> 10/18/2007
> 9:54 AM
>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.0/1077 - Release Date:
> 10/18/2007
> 9:54 AM
>
>
> --
>
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:25:19 +0200
From: "Sorin Srbu" <sorin.srbu at orgfarm.uu.se>
Subject: RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S
To: "'General Red Hat Linux discussion list'" <redhat-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <A36D3EC5077A4D679DBACDC20EEAF0D8 at orgfarm.uu.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Johan Booysen <mailto:johan at matrix-data.co.uk> scribbled on Monday,
October
22, 2007 10:09 AM:
Not so sure about that, as I've noticed that CentOS seems to have more
device
support. Without going into specifics, I've managed to install CentOS a
while
ago in VMWare server using virtual scsi-drives that RHEL didn't cope
with at
the time. Dito for some physical machines.
Maybe CentOS has more user-centric repos available than RHEL does, which
could
account for more hw-support or something to that effect. I'm speculating
heavily now though. 8-)
Give it a go though, it can't more than fail (it's free as well, so why
hold
back, after all it's a lab-machine right?), and in that case at least
you'll
know it doesn't work with CentOS and will have a reference for the
future.
Only because Oracale isn't certified for CentOS doesn't mean it won't
run. 8-)
> I don't think management over here will go for CentOS. Besides, if
> CentOS is the same as Red Hat, I assume that it too will not have the
> driver I need..?
>
> Thanks for the suggestion, though!
>
> Johan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com
> [mailto:redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Sorin Srbu
> Sent: 22 October 2007 07:51
> To: 'General Red Hat Linux discussion list'
> Subject: RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S
>
> Johan Booysen <> scribbled on Friday, October 19, 2007 6:28 PM:
>
> You should do fine with CentOS5 as a replacement for RHEL5. CentOS is
> binary compatible, a clone if you want, of RHEL. Only real difference
> (and the one I can care slightly about) is that CentOS has had all the
> RHEL-logos etc stripped and that it uses yum for updating instead of
> RHEL's up2date and the RHN.
>
> I use CentOS myself for trying out stuff before deploying to our
RHEL3/4
> machines. So far so good. I also like the fact that CentOS is
supported
> as long as RHEL is. Redhat will support v5 until 2011?), and since
> CentOS is basically the same thing as RHEL, the same will be true for
> support and updates for CentOS.
>
> See this thread on the CentOS forums, it might help you decide:
>
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=3107&forum=35
> . 8-)
>
> [off-track]
> I used Fedora before to try out stuff before, but thought the fast
> update-cycle was a bit too bleeding edge. I searched around a while
and
> came across CentOS and haven't looked back since.
> [on-track]
>
> HTH.
>
>
>
>> Matt,
>>
>> Good question, and a very valid point. But anyway, this box is kind
>> of a test-lab Oracle server, and needs to be RHEL5 for that purpose.
>> I believe it will be pretty heavily used, so virtualizing it won't
happen
>> - I'll bet my last penny on that, and on the Springboks, by the way!
:)
>>
>>
>> I think the next thing to do is to perhaps flash the Adaptec
adapter's
>
>> BIOS to a newer version, and then see if the driver will load...I'm
>> pretty certain that I've exhausted all other options for now.
>>
>> Will see what the boss says on Monday...
>>
>> Thanks very much for your reply.
>>
>> Johan
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com
>> [mailto:redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Matt
>> Sent: 19 October 2007 17:18
>> To: 'General Red Hat Linux discussion list'
>> Subject: RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S
>>
>> Perhaps this is not the answer you are looking for, but maybe you can
>> install another distro (Fedora or an older CENTOS) to get driver
support.
>> Also, could using a virtual server work? I am just wondering if you
>> can place something like CENT as the host OS then run VMWare and
maybe
>
>> create a virtual machine with RHEL5? Perhaps this VM will not
require
>
>> direct hardware support for the controller? You might be able to
>> virtualize part of your infrastructure as well and run a legacy OS
>> which supports your controller - then, include this box in the
virtual
>
>> infrastructure.
>>
>> Maybe the real question is why is it that you need to run RHEL5 on a
4
>
>> year old box? I am not saying there is a problem with it, but is it
>> essential that REHL5 is run on this one?
>>
>> Just some thoughts for you...
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com
>> [mailto:redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com]
>> On Behalf Of Andrew Bacchi
>> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 11:41 AM
>> To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
>> Subject: Re: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S
>>
>> I hope you've already solved this problem. Have you checked the
>> Adaptec web site for a Linux driver? If anyone has one, it would be
the
>> OEM.
>>
>>
>> Johan Booysen wrote:
>>> I urgently need advice on this: I need to install RHEL5 on a server
>>> that is probably about 4 years old. It contains an Adaptec SCSI
RAID
>
>>> 2000S adapter, and there is no driver available that I can track
down
>
>>> on short notice (and none included on the RHEL5 discs). Anaconda
>>> does not detect any disks on the server during installation.
>>>
>>> Anyone know what my best bet is to get around this, or where to find
a
>>> driver that will work?
>>>
>>> Thanks very much.
>>>
>>> Johan
>>
>> --
>>
>> veritatis simplex oratio est
>> -Seneca
>>
>> Andrew Bacchi
>> Systems Programmer
>> Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
>> phone: 518.276.6415 fax: 518.276.2809
>>
>> http://www.rpi.edu/~bacchi/
>>
>> --
>>
>> redhat-list mailing list
>> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.0/1077 - Release Date:
>> 10/18/2007 9:54 AM
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.0/1077 - Release Date:
>> 10/18/2007 9:54 AM
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> redhat-list mailing list
>> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
------------------------------
__
redhat-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
End of redhat-list Digest, Vol 44, Issue 23
*******************************************
More information about the redhat-list
mailing list