[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

RE: enterprise backup system recommendations



Just curious, what kind of insurance reasons?  Generally with an
enterprise system like TSM, copies are made of tapes so there is at
least one onsite copy and one offsite copy.   Nightly runs can be
ejected so that the offsite copy is easily identified & for off site
storage.

wilson

-----Original Message-----
From: redhat-list-bounces redhat com
[mailto:redhat-list-bounces redhat com] On Behalf Of David Richards
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 10:53 PM
To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Subject: Re: enterprise backup system recommendations

we have just upgraded from dlt  to lto3 and we are impressed with the 
speeds. We cant use tape libraries as we need to have the tapes taken 
offsite every day for insurance reasons :)


David

Steve Clark wrote:
> We use Tivoli Storage Manager from IBM.  Works great with all
operating systems and supports various libraries and tape drives.  We
are currently using LTO4 drives in our library.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: redhat-list-bounces redhat com
[mailto:redhat-list-bounces redhat com] On Behalf Of Kevin Kramer
> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 9:02 AM
> To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
> Subject: Re: enterprise backup system recommendations
>
> we currently use a 50TB freebsd host that does nightly rsync. we have
> about 9 months of online backups. we have an Overland Neo4200 (50 slot
,
> 2 LTO3 drives) connected to it. currently we just tar to tape, but are
> looking at  HP dataprotector and IBM's backup product for this host.
>
> Yoho, Cindy wrote:
>   
>> We also use Data Protector and it works great. Had it for 12 years,
>> since version 1!  We use an HP Surestore DLT library and a StorageTek
>> SDLT, both of which have been very good and reliable brands, but I'd
go
>> with an LTO if I was building a tape backup system now.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: redhat-list-bounces redhat com
>> [mailto:redhat-list-bounces redhat com] On Behalf Of Anne Moore
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 7:13 AM
>> To: 'General Red Hat Linux discussion list'
>> Subject: RE: enterprise backup system recommendations
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the tip.
>>
>> Any ideas on trustworthy hardware robotic tape units that work with
>> this?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Anne
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: redhat-list-bounces redhat com
>> [mailto:redhat-list-bounces redhat com]
>> On Behalf Of Johan Booysen
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 7:45 AM
>> To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
>> Subject: RE: enterprise backup system recommendations
>>
>> AMANDA is a great piece of software, although I found it somewhat
tricky
>> to set up at first (the Nabble forums for AMANDA helped me out a
lot).
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: redhat-list-bounces redhat com
>> [mailto:redhat-list-bounces redhat com] On Behalf Of nilesh vaghela
>> Sent: 18 September 2007 12:23
>> To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
>> Subject: Re: enterprise backup system recommendations
>>
>> I think AMANDA is right answer.
>>
>> For small network you can try BACKPPC or BACULA.
>>
>> On 9/18/07, Anne Moore <diabeticithink yahoo com> wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> Hi All
>>>
>>> I was wondering what you are all using for your enterprise wide
backup
>>>
>>>       
>>     
>>> solutions. We actually don't have a solutions in place technically
(I
>>> just back up everything to network shares).
>>>
>>> We have money now to purchase a robotic tape library and tapes, but
we
>>>
>>>       
>>     
>>> are not sure what has a solid working reputation that is compatible
>>> with Unix/Linux and Windows boxes.
>>>
>>> What robotic library tape systems are you using? Would you recommend
>>>
>>>       
>> it?
>>
>>     
>>> Thanks for your help.
>>>
>>> Anne
>>> --
>>> redhat-list mailing list
>>> unsubscribe
mailto:redhat-list-request redhat com?subject=unsubscribe
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>
>>
>>     
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request redhat com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
> This email (and attachments if any) is intended only for the use of
the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure
under applicable law.  If the reader of this email is not the intended
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify the sender immediately by return email and destroy all copies of
the email (and attachments if any).
>
>   

-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request redhat com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice:  This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains
information of Merck & Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station,
New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates (which may be known
outside the United States as Merck Frosst, Merck Sharp & Dohme or MSD
and in Japan, as Banyu - direct contact information for affiliates is 
available at http://www.merck.com/contact/contacts.html) that may be 
confidential, proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this 
message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this 
message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then 
delete it from your system.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]