bug in glibc?
Dr Alan J Bartlett
stxsl_ajb at hotmail.com
Fri Jan 18 16:21:41 UTC 2008
KK,
I am running CentOS 5, update 1 ( == RHEL 5.1) and thought I would mimic your test.
$ uname -a
Linux stxsl 2.6.18-53.1.4.el5.stxsl #1 SMP Tue Jan 8 21:29:57 GMT 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
$ rpm -q glibc
glibc-2.5-18.el5_1.1
$ ldd zxc
linux-gate.so.1 => (0x00343000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00b3d000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x0016e000)
$ cat zxc.c
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
main()
{
int a = 0;
while (1) {
printf("XXX(%d)",++a);
(void) sleep(1);
if (fork() == 0) {
printf("\n");
exit(0);
}
}
}
$ ./zxc
XXX(1)
XXX(1)XXX(2)
XXX(1)XXX(2)XXX(3)
XXX(1)XXX(2)XXX(3)XXX(4)
XXX(1)XXX(2)XXX(3)XXX(4)XXX(5)
XXX(1)XXX(2)XXX(3)XXX(4)XXX(5)XXX(6)
$
You are not alone!
Regards,
Alan.
_________________________________________________________________
Free games, great prizes - get gaming at Gamesbox.
http://www.searchgamesbox.com
More information about the redhat-list
mailing list