Help with installing packages for Oracle 10g

Knabe, Troy knabe at 4j.lane.edu
Thu Jun 5 16:56:57 UTC 2008


Even if you are installing 64 bit Oracle there are some packages that need both the 64 bit and 32 bit versions installed. This is a cut/paste of 11g requirements, but if I remember right the 32 bit versions were required for 10G as well.

binutils-2.15.92.0.2
compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3
compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3 (32 bit)
elfutils-libelf-0.97
elfutils-libelf-devel-0.97
gcc-3.4.5
gcc-c++-3.4.5
glibc-2.3.4-2.19
glibc-2.3.4-2.19 (32 bit)
glibc-common-2.3.4
glibc-devel-2.3.4
glibc-devel-2.3.4 (32-bit)
libaio-0.3.105
libaio-0.3.105 (32 bit)
libaio-devel-0.3.105
libgcc-3.4.5
libgcc-3.4.5 (32-bit)
libstdc++-3.4.5
libstdc++-3.4.5 (32 bit)
libstdc++-devel 3.4.5
make-3.80
sysstat-5.0.5

http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/install.102/b15667/pre_install.htm#CIHFICFD


On 6/4/08 8:28 PM, "Geofrey Rainey" <Geofrey.Rainey at tvnz.co.nz> wrote:

The following information is how I build Oracle. The OS is a trimmed
down version of RHEL 5.0 x86_64, and I install the mandatory Oracle
packages like
So:

Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.1
2.6.18-8.el5 #1 SMP x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

yum install kernel-headers.x86_64 gcc-c++.x86_64 libstdc++-devel.x86_64
glibc-headers.x86_64 glibc-devel.i386 glibc-devel.x86_64 libgomp.x86_64
gcc.x86_64 compat-db.i386 compat-db.x86_64 compat-libstdc++-33.i386
compat-libstdc++-33.x86_64 libXp sysstat.x86_64 libaio.x86_64
libaio.i386 xorg-x11-xauth libXt.i386 libXt.x86_64 libXtst.i386
libXtst.x86_64


Regards,

Geofrey Rainey
Systems Engineer
D. 64 9 916 7178
M. 64 21 563 106
geofrey.rainey at tvnz.co.nz

-----Original Message-----
From: redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com
[mailto:redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Scott R. Ehrlich
Sent: Thursday, 5 June 2008 3:09 p.m.
To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Subject: Re: Help with installing packages for Oracle 10g

> I know you are running a 64-bit system, but are you installing a
> 64-bit or a 32-bit Oracle client?  If the latter, you'll probably need
> the 32-bit rpms.  You can tell which version you have installed by
> running
> # rpm -qa --queryformat "%{NAME}-%{VERSION}.%{RELEASE} (%{ARCH})" |
> grep <RPM_name>
> E.g.:
> # rpm -qa --queryformat "%{NAME}-%{VERSION}.%{RELEASE} (%{ARCH})" |
> grep compat-gcc
>
> Alternatively, have you tried verifying or de-installing and
> re-installing the packages that supposedly are "not installed"?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Herta

Hi Herta:

I tried the above.   There is a clear difference between the query
(above)
and what I believe I have installed.  Either I've done everything, and
CentOS/rpm -qa is wrong, or that something else I need to do is just
eluding me, hense my plee to this list.   At the moment, the Oracle
piece
is actually too advanced for this issue.   It really comes down to
something more fundamental.

I may take you up on the idea of yum remove <package> and yum install
<package> for those reporting as not being installed.

Scott

--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
==========================================================
For more information on the Television New Zealand Group, visit us
online at tvnz.co.nz
==========================================================
CAUTION:  This e-mail and any attachment(s) contain information that
is intended to be read only by the named recipient(s).  This information
is not to be used or stored by any other person and/or organisation.


--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list




More information about the redhat-list mailing list