*** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4 AS
Michael Schwendt
mschwendt at gmail.com
Fri Jun 13 11:22:13 UTC 2008
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:09:04 +0100, Bhat, Ajit wrote:
> Thanks but same application runs on Linux 4 ES?
Memory deallocation corruption can depend on memory usage, stack
usage, other run-time side-effects.
Is it the same architecture (x86_64) on both installations?
Same version of glibc? If not, why not?
And in either case, which version of glibc is it?
> Stack trace is -
>
> #0 0x0000003468f2e21d in raise () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
> (gdb) where
> #0 0x0000003468f2e21d in raise () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
> #1 0x0000003468f2fa1e in abort () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
> #2 0x0000003468f63291 in __libc_message () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
> #3 0x0000003468f686b2 in malloc_consolidate () from
> /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
> #4 0x0000003468f68c3a in _int_free () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
> #5 0x0000003468f691f6 in free () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
> #6 0x0000003468f30c69 in exit () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
> #7 0x0000003468f1c402 in __libc_start_main () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
> #8 0x0000000000584a8a in _start ()
Not sure this is correct. What application do you refer to?
More information about the redhat-list
mailing list