EMC Power Path for RH EL 5.2

[Troy]

We're still running rhel4 because of a problem we had with PowerPath  
running on rhel5. You might want to looking into mount options  
problems for EMC devices.

I know we had a problem when we set the fsck mount option to 2. During  
the boot process PowerPath wasn't enabled yet, so those EMC devices  
would fail to mount, because they couldn't be checked. We were left  
with either setting that option to 0, and forgoing the check  
altogether, or staying with rhel4. We elected to stay at rhel4.




On Jun 18, 2008, at 2:38 PM, Allen, Jack wrote:

> Hello:
>        I have run into a little bit of a problem dealing with EMC  
> Power
> Path. I know, your first thought is, so why are you asking this list
> about it and not EMC? I have asked EMC indirectly (see below) and did
> not really like their answer.
>
>        I have some new systems that I installed RH EL 5.1 on with the
> assumption that EMC Power Path would be supported on it. And I think  
> it
> was, is. I have Power Path install on some other systems running RH AS
> 4.6. Because the SAN is from EMC is the reason our SAN group wanted me
> to use Power Path.
>
>        While waiting for our SAN group to allocate disk space and  
> cable
> up the systems I have been keeping the system up to date via yum.  
> Along
> the way the kernel version has changed and the over all system is  
> now RH
> EL 5.2. So when the SAN group told me the SAN was all connected and I
> needed to install EMC Power Path is when it was identified there is a
> problem. It will not install.
>
>        When rpm is run with the latest file from EMC I get an error
> stating the software is for RHEL5. That's correct, just RHEL5, no dot
> anything. I had our SAN group contact EMC and the response back from  
> EMC
> was RH EL 5.2 will not be supported until the 4 QT of this year.
>
>        So my first question is has anyone else run into this problem?
>
>        If so what did you do?
>
>        I know I can probably use the Multi Path software that comes
> with Linux, but I would like to keep all my systems configured as mush
> the same a possible. This just makes dealing with the SAN group a lot
> easier.
>
> Thanks:
> Jack Allen
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list