Disk size recommendations for syslog server

[Kenneth Holter]

Thanks for your reply.

500 GBs sounds quite a lot. We have around 200 servers, and they're usually
not producing too much logging (most of our applications have their own
logging, and doens't rely on syslog). I was hoping there maybe was some sort
of formula defining the avarage number of GBs logging pr server pr year, or
something like that.


On 11/4/08, Rohit khaladkar <rohit.khaladkar at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Well depends on the type of usage, but I guess 500 GB should be more than
> sufficient.
> Thanks!
> Rohit Khaladkar
>
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Kenneth Holter <kenneho.ndu at gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hello list.
> >
> >
> >
> > We're about to set up a centralized syslog server, and were wondering if
> > there are any rules of thumbs regarding the size of the disk.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Kenneth Holter
> > --
> > redhat-list mailing list
> > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> >
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>