HA-LVM vs CLVM
Adam Miller
maxamillion at fedoraproject.org
Tue Feb 2 13:48:15 UTC 2010
If you are going to have to mount it manually on the passive node when
a failure occurs, then why even worry about clustering? Why not just
have an ext3 volume on some shared storage?
You won't have to worry about locking and/or LWW because only one
machine will have it mounted at a time.
(This does sound like it needs to be a full blown RHCS deployment to
provide any realistic HA, but this ext3 and manual fail over should
"work")
-AdamM
--
http://maxamillion.googlepages.com
---------------------------------------------------------
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
More information about the redhat-list
mailing list