/etc/redhat-release
Marti, Robert
RJM002 at shsu.edu
Mon Jun 28 20:07:34 UTC 2010
4.8 is redhat-release-4ES-9
5.5 is redhat-release-5Server-5.5.0.2
So 5 might be relatively clean, but 4 won't be, at least for the minor.
Rob Marti
-----Original Message-----
From: redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of inode0
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 2:54 PM
To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Subject: Re: /etc/redhat-release
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Stainforth, Matthew (SD/DS) <Matthew.Stainforth at gnb.ca> wrote:
>> The "pain point" I mentioned was the inconsistent treatment of
>> /etc/redhat-release which causes maintenance work for those of us who
>> do need to parse it in scripts over time. We can expect distinct
>> cases for each major release of RHEL but there have also been
>> occasions where this file has changed in unpredictable ways across
>> minor update levels as well.
>
> Have you thought about parsing the output of "rpm -q redhat-release"?
> I have need of the same functionality and was going to use this approach.
I just began with RHEL3 ... and over time it grew into a bit of a mess. If I were starting over I might consider this but I don't think the rpm release versions map all that cleanly onto major.minor release numbers either.
If you find a slick way to do that though do share it.
John
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
More information about the redhat-list
mailing list