Persistant Static Routes based on TCP ports

Matty Sarro msarro at gmail.com
Mon Nov 29 17:55:39 UTC 2010


I appreciate the followup, however that's not going to help us. As for what
we're trying to receive, only certain ports will be open on each server.
Basically what I need is policy  based routing, where the policy is
determined by TCP/UDP ports.

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Romeo Theriault
<romeotheriault at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Matty Sarro <msarro at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hey everyone,
> > We're working on a rather complicated installation in a tightly
> controlled
> > environment. Every server has 4 ethernet ports. Eth0 and Eth2 are bonded
> > together as bond0. Eth1 is used for management/snmp. The two networks are
> > completely isolated from one another. What we'd like to do is set up
> > persistant static routes so that all traffic using specified TCP/UDP
> ports
> > goes in/out of a specific interface. From the man/info page it doesn't
> look
> > like this can be done with the route command; or can it? If not, can
> anyone
> > suggest an alternative?
>
>
> I'm not sure exactly what you're trying to achieve, but you may want
> to take a look at the 'ip' command. This allows you to setup more than
> one routing table on the host.
>
> See: http://linux-ip.net/html/routing-tables.html
>
> Romeo
>
>
>
>
> > -Matty
> > --
> > redhat-list mailing list
> > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Romeo Theriault
> System Administrator
> Information Technology Services
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>



More information about the redhat-list mailing list