[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

RE: Subject: sendmail domain configuration as Message 9



Allen,
 
You said you have tried various masquerade but have you tried masqyerade as suggested by Greg?
 
MASQUERADE_AS(`my_domain.net')dnl

Just curious.
 
jw
 

--- On Tue, 8/31/10, redhat-list-request redhat com <redhat-list-request redhat com> wrote:


From: redhat-list-request redhat com <redhat-list-request redhat com>
Subject: redhat-list Digest, Vol 78, Issue 27
To: redhat-list redhat com
Date: Tuesday, August 31, 2010, 9:00 AM


Send redhat-list mailing list submissions to
    redhat-list redhat com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    redhat-list-request redhat com

You can reach the person managing the list at
    redhat-list-owner redhat com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of redhat-list digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. RE: Subject: sendmail domain configuration as Message 9
      (Allen, Jack)
   2. RE: Subject: sendmail domain configuration as Message 9
      (Greg_Wilson aotx uscourts gov)
   3. RE: Subject: sendmail domain configuration as Message 9
      (Allen, Jack)
   4. too many nfs error messages (ESGLinux)
   5. Re: too many nfs error messages (Dustin Larmeir)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:53:58 -0400
From: "Allen, Jack" <Jack Allen mckesson com>
To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list redhat com>
Subject: RE: Subject: sendmail domain configuration as Message 9
Message-ID:
    <230ED15F81AFD3409345FFA4E565F0E50D3F16A0 NDHV3000 na corp mckesson com>
    
Content-Type: text/plain;    charset="iso-8859-1"

-----Original Message-----
From: redhat-list-bounces redhat com [mailto:redhat-list-bounces redhat com] On Behalf Of John Wong
Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2010 3:11 AM
To: redhat-list redhat com
Cc: j w
Subject: Re: Subject: sendmail domain configuration as Message 9


Hi Allen,
?
I believe you need to ask your ISP to add a DNS MX record for system.house.network.
?
Why don't you just change house.network to one of your registered domain? The reason it work is because BigDaddy.com created DNS MX records for those domains.
?
Hope it will help.
?
jw

------------------------------

Message: 9
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 19:01:16 -0400
From: "Allen, Jack" <Jack Allen mckesson com>
To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list redhat com>
Subject: sendmail domain configuration
Message-ID:
??? <230ED15F81AFD3409345FFA4E565F0E50D2B4FB1 NDHV3000 na corp mckesson com>
??? 
Content-Type: text/plain;??? charset="us-ascii"

Hello:

? ? ? ? I need to know exactly what options need to be specified in
sendmail.mc to generate the proper sendmail.cf file so the domain name
my ISP sees is valid.

? ? ? ? Here is some information why this is needed. I have 2 Windows PC
and 1 Linux systems and several Home Automation, NAS, Media systems on a
home network. I have named running on the Linux system for a local
fictional domain called "house.network". I know network is longer than
the normal 3 character .com, .net, ..., but it works with no problems as
far as name lookup and what have you. I also chose the longer name so
there would be no conflict with a real domain name out in the real world
and thing on my local network would not get routed to it. I have some of
the special systems send email to the Linux system which then has
aliases to send certain emails to my ISP email and/or my work email.
This is where the problem starts.

? ? ? ? If the Linux host name is set to system. house.network, then
when it connects to the ISP I get error 550 Invalid sender domain. This
is because the domain cannot be looked up by the ISP and I can
understand why. If I set the Linux host name to system.my_domain.net it
works like it should. I registered 2 real domain names (my_domain.com
and my_domain.net) with BigDaddy.com partly for this. But when the Linux
host name is not in the same domain as the other systems on my local
network it cause some other problem.

? ? ? ? If I add the option in sendmail.mc to generate a sendmail.cf
file with Djmy_domain.net and have the Linux host name set to
system.house.network the ISP complains with basically the same 550
error. Looking at the returned email some of the header information
looks like:

Reporting-MTA: dns; my_domain.net

Received-From-MTA: DNS; system.house.network

Which indicates to me the value of the host name is what my ISP sees
that it tries to validate. I have looked at and tried various
configurations for masquerading, but have the same problem. It seems to
rewrite certain header entries that basically the user's client software
look at to display from and to and what have you, but does not change
the Received-From-MTA entry.

? ? ? ? So I hope someone has some good suggestions to help me resolve
this problem.

-----

Jack Allen
============

Thanks for the reply, but my ISP is NOT going to add anything to their DNS for my system. I am just one hundreds of thousands that get a dynamic IP address from them. The point of my question is to find suggestions on how to configure sendmail to work with an ISP that is not going to change anything, but validates the systems that connects to them to relay email. This is done to eliminate SPAMER.

-----
Jack Allen

??????? 



?


      
-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request redhat com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:19:32 -0500
From: Greg_Wilson aotx uscourts gov
To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list redhat com>
Subject: RE: Subject: sendmail domain configuration as Message 9
Message-ID:
    <OFDDBC7785 AEB64B49-ON8625778F 006F4DB9-8625778F 006FA72A uscmail uscourts gov>
    
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1


MASQUERADE_AS(`my_domain.net')dnl


Greg Wilson
Information Technology Specialist
Systems Deployment and Support Division




From:       "Allen, Jack" <Jack Allen mckesson com>
To:         General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list redhat com>
Date:       08/30/2010 11:59 AM
Subject:    RE: Subject: sendmail domain configuration as Message 9
Sent by:    redhat-list-bounces redhat com



-----Original Message-----
From: redhat-list-bounces redhat com [mailto:redhat-list-bounces redhat com
] On Behalf Of John Wong
Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2010 3:11 AM
To: redhat-list redhat com
Cc: j w
Subject: Re: Subject: sendmail domain configuration as Message 9


Hi Allen,

I believe you need to ask your ISP to add a DNS MX record for
system.house.network.

Why don't you just change house.network to one of your registered domain?
The reason it work is because BigDaddy.com created DNS MX records for those
domains.

Hope it will help.

jw

------------------------------

Message: 9
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 19:01:16 -0400
From: "Allen, Jack" <Jack Allen mckesson com>
To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list redhat com>
Subject: sendmail domain configuration
Message-ID:

<230ED15F81AFD3409345FFA4E565F0E50D2B4FB1 NDHV3000 na corp mckesson com>

Content-Type: text/plain;??? charset="us-ascii"

Hello:

? ? ? ? I need to know exactly what options need to be specified in
sendmail.mc to generate the proper sendmail.cf file so the domain name
my ISP sees is valid.

? ? ? ? Here is some information why this is needed. I have 2 Windows PC
and 1 Linux systems and several Home Automation, NAS, Media systems on a
home network. I have named running on the Linux system for a local
fictional domain called "house.network". I know network is longer than
the normal 3 character .com, .net, ..., but it works with no problems as
far as name lookup and what have you. I also chose the longer name so
there would be no conflict with a real domain name out in the real world
and thing on my local network would not get routed to it. I have some of
the special systems send email to the Linux system which then has
aliases to send certain emails to my ISP email and/or my work email.
This is where the problem starts.

? ? ? ? If the Linux host name is set to system. house.network, then
when it connects to the ISP I get error 550 Invalid sender domain. This
is because the domain cannot be looked up by the ISP and I can
understand why. If I set the Linux host name to system.my_domain.net it
works like it should. I registered 2 real domain names (my_domain.com
and my_domain.net) with BigDaddy.com partly for this. But when the Linux
host name is not in the same domain as the other systems on my local
network it cause some other problem.

? ? ? ? If I add the option in sendmail.mc to generate a sendmail.cf
file with Djmy_domain.net and have the Linux host name set to
system.house.network the ISP complains with basically the same 550
error. Looking at the returned email some of the header information
looks like:

Reporting-MTA: dns; my_domain.net

Received-From-MTA: DNS; system.house.network

Which indicates to me the value of the host name is what my ISP sees
that it tries to validate. I have looked at and tried various
configurations for masquerading, but have the same problem. It seems to
rewrite certain header entries that basically the user's client software
look at to display from and to and what have you, but does not change
the Received-From-MTA entry.

? ? ? ? So I hope someone has some good suggestions to help me resolve
this problem.

-----

Jack Allen
============

Thanks for the reply, but my ISP is NOT going to add anything to their DNS
for my system. I am just one hundreds of thousands that get a dynamic IP
address from them. The point of my question is to find suggestions on how
to configure sendmail to work with an ISP that is not going to change
anything, but validates the systems that connects to them to relay email.
This is done to eliminate SPAMER.

-----
Jack Allen









--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request redhat com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request redhat com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list





------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:39:33 -0400
From: "Allen, Jack" <Jack Allen mckesson com>
To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list redhat com>
Subject: RE: Subject: sendmail domain configuration as Message 9
Message-ID:
    <230ED15F81AFD3409345FFA4E565F0E50D3F1F70 NDHV3000 na corp mckesson com>
    
Content-Type: text/plain;    charset="iso-8859-1"

Look at the end.


-----Original Message-----
From: redhat-list-bounces redhat com [mailto:redhat-list-bounces redhat com] On Behalf Of Greg_Wilson aotx uscourts gov
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 4:20 PM
To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Subject: RE: Subject: sendmail domain configuration as Message 9


MASQUERADE_AS(`my_domain.net')dnl


Greg Wilson
Information Technology Specialist
Systems Deployment and Support Division




From:       "Allen, Jack" <Jack Allen mckesson com>
To:         General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list redhat com>
Date:       08/30/2010 11:59 AM
Subject:    RE: Subject: sendmail domain configuration as Message 9
Sent by:    redhat-list-bounces redhat com



-----Original Message-----
From: redhat-list-bounces redhat com [mailto:redhat-list-bounces redhat com
] On Behalf Of John Wong
Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2010 3:11 AM
To: redhat-list redhat com
Cc: j w
Subject: Re: Subject: sendmail domain configuration as Message 9


Hi Allen,

I believe you need to ask your ISP to add a DNS MX record for
system.house.network.

Why don't you just change house.network to one of your registered domain?
The reason it work is because BigDaddy.com created DNS MX records for those
domains.

Hope it will help.

jw

------------------------------

Message: 9
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 19:01:16 -0400
From: "Allen, Jack" <Jack Allen mckesson com>
To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list redhat com>
Subject: sendmail domain configuration
Message-ID:

<230ED15F81AFD3409345FFA4E565F0E50D2B4FB1 NDHV3000 na corp mckesson com>

Content-Type: text/plain;??? charset="us-ascii"

Hello:

? ? ? ? I need to know exactly what options need to be specified in
sendmail.mc to generate the proper sendmail.cf file so the domain name
my ISP sees is valid.

? ? ? ? Here is some information why this is needed. I have 2 Windows PC
and 1 Linux systems and several Home Automation, NAS, Media systems on a
home network. I have named running on the Linux system for a local
fictional domain called "house.network". I know network is longer than
the normal 3 character .com, .net, ..., but it works with no problems as
far as name lookup and what have you. I also chose the longer name so
there would be no conflict with a real domain name out in the real world
and thing on my local network would not get routed to it. I have some of
the special systems send email to the Linux system which then has
aliases to send certain emails to my ISP email and/or my work email.
This is where the problem starts.

? ? ? ? If the Linux host name is set to system. house.network, then
when it connects to the ISP I get error 550 Invalid sender domain. This
is because the domain cannot be looked up by the ISP and I can
understand why. If I set the Linux host name to system.my_domain.net it
works like it should. I registered 2 real domain names (my_domain.com
and my_domain.net) with BigDaddy.com partly for this. But when the Linux
host name is not in the same domain as the other systems on my local
network it cause some other problem.

? ? ? ? If I add the option in sendmail.mc to generate a sendmail.cf
file with Djmy_domain.net and have the Linux host name set to
system.house.network the ISP complains with basically the same 550
error. Looking at the returned email some of the header information
looks like:

Reporting-MTA: dns; my_domain.net

Received-From-MTA: DNS; system.house.network

Which indicates to me the value of the host name is what my ISP sees
that it tries to validate. I have looked at and tried various
configurations for masquerading, but have the same problem. It seems to
rewrite certain header entries that basically the user's client software
look at to display from and to and what have you, but does not change
the Received-From-MTA entry.

? ? ? ? So I hope someone has some good suggestions to help me resolve
this problem.

-----

Jack Allen
============

Thanks for the reply, but my ISP is NOT going to add anything to their DNS
for my system. I am just one hundreds of thousands that get a dynamic IP
address from them. The point of my question is to find suggestions on how
to configure sendmail to work with an ISP that is not going to change
anything, but validates the systems that connects to them to relay email.
This is done to eliminate SPAMER.

-----
Jack Allen

=========
Thanks for the reply.

I have already tried that and it does not work. When my system connects to the Comcast email server is tells it it's real name and the masqueraded name. Comcast tries to look up the real name which it cannot find and then refuses to relay the email. It returns the email stating it is an invalid domain.

-----
Jack Allen



------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:07:38 +0200
From: ESGLinux <esggrupos gmail com>
To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list redhat com>
Subject: too many nfs error messages
Message-ID:
    <AANLkTiniqUk6atcw-78FVaM_SkC2GeqRrgML77RtAvxa mail gmail com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi all,

I have a nfs server that I use to store my backups and in the client machine
I get a lot of messages like these:

Aug 31 09:03:47 SERVER kernel: nfs: server 192.168.1.111 not responding,
still trying
Aug 31 09:03:47 SERVER kernel: nfs: server 192.168.1.111 not responding,
still trying
Aug 31 09:03:48 SERVER kernel: nfs: server 192.168.1.111 not responding,
still trying
Aug 31 09:03:51 SERVER kernel: nfs: server 192.168.1.111 OK

I have mounted the export this way:

192.168.1.111:/nas/NASDisk-00002/share on /backup type nfs
(rw,noatime,noacl,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,hard,timeo=10,intr,addr=192.168.1.111)

which can be the problem? Is there any problem with de mount options?

I have tried with the soft option but with this option the server gives the
error and the backup process stops. (which is worse)

any idea?

Thank in advance

ESG


------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 07:02:28 -0500
From: Dustin Larmeir <dustin larmeir com>
To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list redhat com>
Subject: Re: too many nfs error messages
Message-ID:
    <AANLkTikiK6YpdGLuZPv=aGrKeUHXxBtP-uOkpWjJpTbG mail gmail com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

ESG,

That message simply implies that the client is unable to reach the NFS
server for some reason. This could be because of a network issue or a issue
on the NFS server side. What do the logs show on the server side? Also, it
may be useful to check this in realtime when the issue occurs from both the
client and the server to get a better assessment of the issue. - Dustin

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:07 AM, ESGLinux <esggrupos gmail com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I have a nfs server that I use to store my backups and in the client
> machine
> I get a lot of messages like these:
>
> Aug 31 09:03:47 SERVER kernel: nfs: server 192.168.1.111 not responding,
> still trying
> Aug 31 09:03:47 SERVER kernel: nfs: server 192.168.1.111 not responding,
> still trying
> Aug 31 09:03:48 SERVER kernel: nfs: server 192.168.1.111 not responding,
> still trying
> Aug 31 09:03:51 SERVER kernel: nfs: server 192.168.1.111 OK
>
> I have mounted the export this way:
>
> 192.168.1.111:/nas/NASDisk-00002/share on /backup type nfs
>
> (rw,noatime,noacl,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,hard,timeo=10,intr,addr=192.168.1.111)
>
> which can be the problem? Is there any problem with de mount options?
>
> I have tried with the soft option but with this option the server gives the
> error and the backup process stops. (which is worse)
>
> any idea?
>
> Thank in advance
>
> ESG
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request redhat com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>


------------------------------

__
redhat-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request redhat com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

End of redhat-list Digest, Vol 78, Issue 27
*******************************************





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]