Patching Red-Hat to a specific version.

Matty Sarro msarro at gmail.com
Thu Dec 8 17:09:13 UTC 2011


It would, yes. Yum update will download the latest packages as of the
time you run it. So, we do that, zip the packages and call it a
"milestone." Then we run a milestone through QA once a month to make
sure nothing gets broken by the updates.

If you want to base it on what is currently installed, the best I know
of is to run rpm -qa to list all of the packages (though this won't
show the super minor patches) on the 5.7 box, and turn them into a
long, long yum install (package names) command, and then run that with
downloadonly on one of the 5.6 boxes. That should at least pull your
5.6 boxes into line with the 5.7 box. Not sure if it'll work though, I
somehow missed that you had some boxes running 5.6 and some running
5.7.

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:00 PM, cliff here <c4ifford at gmail.com> wrote:
> Ya, that makes sense. Won't yum download even newer updates than what is on
> box?
> Meaning my 5.7 is my golden box and I wouldn't want to update further than
> that.
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Matty Sarro <msarro at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:18 AM, cliff here <c4ifford at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hey guys and gals,
>> >
>> > This might be a simple question but it's in a scenario that I haven't had
>> > to deal with with before. I'm about to enter testing process where all of
>> > my (four) redhat boxes need to be the same version. Well right now I have
>> > three 5.6 hosts and one 5.7 host; now I know those point releases become
>> > less and less important once the hosts are synced up to RHN. I know that
>> > most of the packages are the same version or close enough to it, but the
>> > product testers want to see the same version exactly. So is there a way
>> to
>> > sync to RHN on a specific point release?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > NOTICE: This message, including all attachments, is intended for the use
>> of
>> > the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
>> > information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure
>> > under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended
>> > recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this
>> message
>> > to its intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
>> dissemination,
>> > distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
>> > you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender
>> > immediately by replying "Received in error" and immediately delete this
>> > message and all its attachments.
>> >
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > --
>> > redhat-list mailing list
>> > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
>> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>>
>> I ran into a similar problem. What I did was in QA, had one of the
>> boxes be my "golden" box. On that box I installed the yum-downloadonly
>> plugin, and ran the following command:
>> yum update --downloadonly --downloaddir=/var/updaterollup -y
>>
>> This will pull down all updates to make the box current, and store
>> them in the /var/updaterollup directory (you will need to create it).
>> Then, you can copy this set of patches across each of your servers and
>> install. It guarantees that everything has the same version installed.
>> Thus far its worked pretty well, though occasionally RPM will bitch
>> that versions don't match. Given that its the same thing yum would
>> have run, you can probably safely force the installation.
>>
>> We have been doing this but utilizing opsware/hp server automation to
>> deploy the packages. Usually the first remediation will install any
>> kernel updates and libraries, and then the second remediation will
>> install all other software.
>>
>> HTH
>> -Matty
>>
>> --
>> redhat-list mailing list
>> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> NOTICE: This message, including all attachments, is intended for the use of
> the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
> information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure
> under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message
> to its intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
> distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
> you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender
> immediately by replying "Received in error" and immediately delete this
> message and all its attachments.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list




More information about the redhat-list mailing list