Bug 69077 and nfs
(Imed Chihi) عماد الشيحي
imed.chihi at gmail.com
Wed Mar 30 16:30:44 UTC 2011
> The bug we are interested in involves the NFS server replying with an
> ENOENT status. This should never happen and is causing problems with some
> client side software, they don't know how to handle something that should
> never happen. I've searched through the public bugs I have access to, but
> haven't been able to find any reference to this one.
Why do you think that the NFS server should never reply with a ENOENT?
This is a valid reply when the client attempts to access a non
existing file.
Due to the client cache coherency behaviour, there are circumstances
when the server might reply with ENOENT when the file does actually
exist.
I suggest you give more details on the client and the server versions
plus a way to reproduce the behaviour you observed.
Red Hat Bugzilla bug #69077 appears to be a non-public bug. In
addition, telling from the relatively low number, it must have been
filed at least 5 years ago and unlikely to be relevant to RHEL 5.
> It should be filed
> against RHEL5.X and have some keywords including NFS and ENOENT, perhaps
> ESTALE and EBUSY as well.
Is this a question or a suggestion?
-Imed
--
Imed Chihi - عماد الشيحي
http://perso.hexabyte.tn/ichihi/
More information about the redhat-list
mailing list