disk partitions on that aren't recognized by mkfs + parted
Doll, Margaret Ann
margaret_doll at brown.edu
Thu May 5 20:53:44 UTC 2011
fuser -v /dev/sdi1
[root at m3science ~]# lvdisplay
--- Logical volume ---
LV Name /dev/vg1/lv1
VG Name vg1
LV UUID TzLAvI-cXKp-kevB-cIwi-d900-7ljt-KB89Tl
LV Write Access read/write
LV Status available
# open 1
LV Size 7.20 TB
Current LE 1887437
Segments 4
Allocation inherit
Read ahead sectors auto
- currently set to 256
Block device 253:0
[root at m3science ~]# mdadm --stop /dev/sdi1
mdadm: /dev/sdi1 does not appear to be an md device
The lvdisplay shows the m3team3 logical volume which includes sdd1, sde1,
sdf1 and sdg1
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:43 PM, raj sourabh <rajsourabh1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The below output indicates;
>
> Disk is in use by some process/software.. Please make sure this by
> running:
> #fuser -v /dev/sdi1
> (This should not display anything if disk is not in use)
>
> Disk could be part of RAID or volume group
> Try this and check for device /dev/sdi1
> # lvdisplay
>
> and finally, The following should disply something if it was part of
> any RAID
> # mdadm --stop /dev/sdi1
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Raj
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Doll, Margaret Ann <
> margaret_doll at brown.edu
> > wrote:
>
> > fdisk /dev/sdi
> >
> > The number of cylinders for this disk is set to 243201.
> > There is nothing wrong with that, but this is larger than 1024,
> > and could in certain setups cause problems with:
> > 1) software that runs at boot time (e.g., old versions of LILO)
> > 2) booting and partitioning software from other OSs
> > (e.g., DOS FDISK, OS/2 FDISK)
> >
> > Command (m for help): p
> >
> > Disk /dev/sdi: 2000.3 GB, 2000398934016 bytes
> > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243201 cylinders
> > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
> >
> > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> > /dev/sdi1 1 243201 1953512001 83 Linux
> >
> > Command (m for help): d
> > Selected partition 1
> >
> > Command (m for help): p
> >
> > Disk /dev/sdi: 2000.3 GB, 2000398934016 bytes
> > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243201 cylinders
> > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
> >
> > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> >
> > Command (m for help): n
> > Command action
> > e extended
> > p primary partition (1-4)
> > p
> > Partition number (1-4): 1
> > First cylinder (1-243201, default 1):
> > Using default value 1
> > Last cylinder or +size or +sizeM or +sizeK (1-243201, default 243201):
> > Using default value 243201
> >
> > Command (m for help): w
> > The partition table has been altered!
> >
> > Calling ioctl() to re-read partition table.
> > Syncing disks.
> > [root at m3science ~]# partprobe
> > Warning: Unable to open /dev/hda read-write (Read-only file system).
> > /dev/hda has been opened read-only.
> > Warning: /dev/sdh contains GPT signatures, indicating that it has a GPT
> > table. However, it does not have a valid fake msdos partition table, as
> it
> > should. Perhaps it was corrupted -- possibly by a program that doesn't
> > understand GPT partition tables. Or perhaps you deleted the GPT table,
> and
> > are now using an msdos partition table. Is this a GPT partition table?
> > [root at m3science ~]# mke2fs -j /dev/sdi1
> > mke2fs 1.39 (29-May-2006)
> > /dev/sdi1 is apparently in use by the system; will not make a filesystem
> > here!
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:23 PM, raj sourabh <rajsourabh1 at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, so things look fine till here when you have created partitions
> > > sdh1,sdi1,sdj1,sdk1.. even after running partprobe if you are getting
> the
> > > same here then try the follwing;
> > >
> > > # delete one of the partition through fdisk eg.sdi1
> > > # after deletion check eg. # fdisk /dev/sdi and then list the
> partitions
> > > (You should not see anything)
> > > # Recreate the partition as primary
> > > # Partprobe
> > > # and then try mke2fs -j /dev/sdi1
> > >
> > > Hope this should give some useful results.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Raj
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Doll, Margaret Ann
> > > <margaret_doll at brown.edu>wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:33 AM, raj sourabh <rajsourabh1 at gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Please provide the output of following:
> > > > >
> > > > > #fdisk -l
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > for the four disks in question
> > > >
> > > > WARNING: GPT (GUID Partition Table) detected on '/dev/sdh'! The util
> > > fdisk
> > > > doesn't support GPT. Use GNU Parted.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Disk /dev/sdh: 2000.3 GB, 2000398934016 bytes
> > > > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243201 cylinders
> > > > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
> > > >
> > > > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> > > > /dev/sdh1 1 243201 1953512001 83 Linux
> > > >
> > > > Disk /dev/sdi: 2000.3 GB, 2000398934016 bytes
> > > > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243201 cylinders
> > > > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
> > > >
> > > > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> > > > /dev/sdi1 1 243201 1953512001 83 Linux
> > > >
> > > > Disk /dev/sdj: 2000.3 GB, 2000398934016 bytes
> > > > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243201 cylinders
> > > > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
> > > >
> > > > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> > > > /dev/sdj1 1 243201 1953512001 83 Linux
> > > >
> > > > Disk /dev/sdk: 2000.3 GB, 2000398934016 bytes
> > > > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243201 cylinders
> > > > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
> > > >
> > > > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> > > > /dev/sdk1 1 243201 1953512001 83 Linux
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > #df -h
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> > > > /dev/sda3 1.6G 982M 489M 67% /
> > > > tmpfs 1.8G 0 1.8G 0% /dev/shm
> > > > /dev/sda10 883G 449G 389G 54% /home
> > > > /dev/sdb1 4.1G 569M 3.4G 15% /var
> > > > /dev/sdb2 913G 245G 622G 29% /home2
> > > > /dev/sda9 730M 519M 173M 76% /oldvar
> > > > /dev/sda8 1.1G 34M 976M 4% /tmp
> > > > /dev/sda6 2.1G 72M 2.0G 4% /opt
> > > > /dev/sda2 8.1G 3.6G 4.2G 46% /usr
> > > > /dev/sda5 3.1G 2.3G 671M 78% /usr/local
> > > > /dev/sda1 1.1G 120M 889M 12% /boot
> > > > /dev/sdc 12T 12T 183G 99% /m3team
> > > > /dev/mapper/vg1-lv1 7.1T 1.6T 5.2T 24% /m3team3
> > > > quahog2:/LVM2/crism13
> > > > 4.9T 191G 4.5T 5% /m3team2
> > > > porter2:/m3_usb1 1.8T 96K 1.7T 1% /m3_usb1
> > > > porter2:/m3_usb2 1.8T 274G 1.5T 16% /m3_usb2
> > > > none 1.8G 104K 1.8G 1% /var/lib/xenstored
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > eight disks were purchased and added to the system as the same time.
> I
> > > > successfully created a log volume group out of the first four; they
> are
> > > > mounted on /m3team3.
> > > >
> > > > I used parted to create a GPT label on the disks. Then I used fdisk
> to
> > > > create one partition taking up all the space on the disk. I then
> used
> > > > "mkfs
> > > > -t ext3 /dev/sdg1 (etc.) on all the partitions before I used
> pvcreate,
> > > > vgcreate and lgcreate.
> > > >
> > > > The process worked on the first four disks.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your help
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Raj
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Doll, Margaret Ann
> > > > > <margaret_doll at brown.edu>wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I get the same error with mk2efs -j /dev/sdi1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > mke2fs 1.39 (29-May-2006)
> > > > > > /dev/sdi1 is apparently in use by the system; will not make a
> > > > filesystem
> > > > > > here!
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 8:50 AM, raj sourabh <
> > rajsourabh1 at gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Did you try using fdisk for partition? and the use partprobe.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > eg. #fdisk /dev/sdi
> > > > > > > # partprobe
> > > > > > > #mke2fs -j /dev/sdiX
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I hope this would help.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Raj
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Doll, Margaret Ann
> > > > > > > <margaret_doll at brown.edu>wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In this particular case, I have rebooted the system many
> times
> > > and
> > > > am
> > > > > > > > unable
> > > > > > > > to get mkfs to work. The disk partitions are also not on the
> > > same
> > > > > disk
> > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > /. How do I get the disk partitions to work with mkfs?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Corey Kovacs <
> > > > corey.kovacs at gmail.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Important to note
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 1. It's not often / is repartitioned.
> > > > > > > > > 2. This isn't a problem unique to RHEL.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > C
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Sent from my iPod
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On May 5, 2011, at 8:14 AM, "Marti, Robert" <
> RJM002 at shsu.edu
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > A reboot is required if you change partitions on the same
> > > disk
> > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > houses /.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On May 5, 2011, at 6:41, "Stainforth, Matthew (SD/DS)" <
> > > > > > > > > Matthew.Stainforth at gnb.ca> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >>> the default behavior for RHEL6 but I am not sure when
> or
> > IF
> > > > it
> > > > > > > > > >>> actually hit RHEL5. Sounds like it might have. In RHEL6
> a
> > > > > reboot
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > >>> simply a requirement, full stop.
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> In RHEL6 a reboot is required between repartitioning and
> > > > > mkfs'ing?
> > > > > > > > What
> > > > > > > > > a sad thing if true.
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > > > >> redhat-list mailing list
> > > > > > > > > >> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com
> > > > > > > ?subject=unsubscribe
> > > > > > > > > >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > redhat-list mailing list
> > > > > > > > > > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com
> > > > > > > ?subject=unsubscribe
> > > > > > > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > redhat-list mailing list
> > > > > > > > > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com
> > > > > > ?subject=unsubscribe
> > > > > > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > redhat-list mailing list
> > > > > > > > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com
> > > > > ?subject=unsubscribe
> > > > > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > redhat-list mailing list
> > > > > > > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com
> > > > ?subject=unsubscribe
> > > > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > redhat-list mailing list
> > > > > > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com
> > > ?subject=unsubscribe
> > > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > redhat-list mailing list
> > > > > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com
> > ?subject=unsubscribe
> > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > > > >
> > > > --
> > > > redhat-list mailing list
> > > > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com
> ?subject=unsubscribe
> > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > > >
> > > --
> > > redhat-list mailing list
> > > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > >
> > --
> > redhat-list mailing list
> > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> >
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
More information about the redhat-list
mailing list