Bug 80018: NFSv4 on RHEL 6.2 over six times slower than 5.7

Corey Kovacs corey.kovacs at gmail.com
Tue Jul 10 14:57:26 UTC 2012


Maybe it takes posting your config to the list so we can see if you made a
mistake. Are you a paying customer actually using RHEL? If this a real bug
I doubt it would be so ignored. Anyone else having a similar problem?

Lets start by being sensible and not antagonistic.

C
On Jul 10, 2012 7:52 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote:

> For any redhatters on the list, I'm going to be reopening this bug today.
>
> I am also VERY unhappy with Redhat. I filed the bug months ago, and it was
> *never* assigned - no one apparently even looked at it. It's a
> show-stopper for us, since it hits us on our home directory servers.
>
> A week or so ago, I updated our test system to 6.3, and *nothing* has
> changed. Unpack a large file locally, and it's seconds. Unpack from an
> NFS-mounted directory to a local disk takes about 1.5min. NFS mount either
> an ext3 or ext4 fs, cd to that directory, and I run a job to unpack a
> large file to the NFS-mounted directory, and it's between 6.5 and 7.5
> *MINUTES*. We cannot move our home directory servers to 6.x with this
> unacknowledged ->BUG<-.
>
> Large file is defined as a 28M .gz file, unpacked to 92M.
>
> This is 100% repeatable.
>
> I tried sending an email to our support weeks ago, and got no response.
> Maybe it takes shaming in a public forum to get anyone to acknowledge this
> exists....
>
>          mark
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>



More information about the redhat-list mailing list