[redhat-lspp] /tmp polyinstantiation and the man command
Linda Knippers
linda.knippers at hp.com
Tue Nov 28 16:01:45 UTC 2006
Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 10:41 -0500, Linda Knippers wrote:
>
>>Stephen Smalley wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Version of policycoreutils-newrole and selinux-policy-mls?
>>>Contents of /etc/pam.d/newrole?
>>
>>Sorry, I'd mentioned in the call that I was running the latest from
>>Dan's people page but omitted it from the mail. I have these
>>rpms.
>>
>>policycoreutils-1.33.2-2.el5
>>policycoreutils-newrole-1.33.2-2.el5
>>selinux-policy-mls-2.4.5-3.el5
>>selinux-policy-2.4.5-3.el5
>>
>>/etc/pam.d/newrole has this:
>>#%PAM-1.0
>>auth include system-auth
>>account include system-auth
>>password include system-auth
>>session include system-auth
>>session optional pam_xauth.so
>
>
> I would have expected the latter to include:
> session required pam_namespace.so unmnt_remnt no_unmount_on_close
I added that line but I don't see any difference in behavior. I added
it at the end. Does the location matter? (Sorry for the dumb pam question).
-- ljk
More information about the redhat-lspp
mailing list