[redhat-lspp] /tmp polyinstantiation and the man command

Linda Knippers linda.knippers at hp.com
Tue Nov 28 16:01:45 UTC 2006


Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 10:41 -0500, Linda Knippers wrote:
> 
>>Stephen Smalley wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Version of policycoreutils-newrole and selinux-policy-mls?
>>>Contents of /etc/pam.d/newrole?
>>
>>Sorry, I'd mentioned in the call that I was running the latest from
>>Dan's people page but omitted it from the mail.  I have these
>>rpms.
>>
>>policycoreutils-1.33.2-2.el5
>>policycoreutils-newrole-1.33.2-2.el5
>>selinux-policy-mls-2.4.5-3.el5
>>selinux-policy-2.4.5-3.el5
>>
>>/etc/pam.d/newrole has this:
>>#%PAM-1.0
>>auth       include      system-auth
>>account    include      system-auth
>>password   include      system-auth
>>session    include      system-auth
>>session    optional     pam_xauth.so
> 
> 
> I would have expected the latter to include:
> session    required     pam_namespace.so unmnt_remnt no_unmount_on_close

I added that line but I don't see any difference in behavior.  I added
it at the end.  Does the location matter?  (Sorry for the dumb pam question).

-- ljk




More information about the redhat-lspp mailing list