[redhat-lspp] Re: labeled ipsec policy

[Venkat Yekkirala]

> > > I'm not very sure how users will use the SPD labeling.  I 
> suspect that
> > > they will be labeled with probably the other side's 
> domain type.  For
> > > example, if httpd_t and mozilla_t are connected, the SPD would be
> > > mozilla_t on the http machine and httpd_t on the mozilla machine.
> > >
> > 
> > In the simplest case, you would just have a generic 
> "labeled_ipsec_t" Type
> > that would be specified for all the spd rules that pertain 
> to labeled-ipsec.
> > All the different domains that need to use labeled-ipsec 
> would then polmatch
> > to labeled_ipsec_t.
> > 
> > The SAs will always and automatically be using the 

s/always/always (when the spd rule has a context associate with it)/

> originating domain Type.
> > So, the SA from the client to server would be auto-labeled 
> mozilla_t,
> > rss_aggregator_t, etc. (on both ends), and the SA from the 
> server to client
> > would be auto-labeled httpd_t (again on both ends).
> 
> Ok, so then I will go with my original idea of a type ipsec_spd_t and
> create an interface that allows sysadmins to create selinux policy for
> "polmatching" ipsec SAs to the ipsec policy type, 
> ipsec_spd_t. Thanks!!
> 
> Joy 
>