[redhat-lspp] Re: MLS enforcing PTYs, sshd, and newrole

[Russell Coker]

On Saturday 28 October 2006 01:36, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:00:28 +1000, Russell Coker said:
> > On Thursday 19 October 2006 23:21, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh at redhat.com> 
wrote:
> > > If we then remove -l from newrole we are done?
> >
> > Why remove it?  Why not just cease using it and leave it there for other
> > people who have different needs?
>
> I suspect that it wouldn't fly during an eval, because even if unused, it

OK.

Well #if 0 would still be better than removing the code.  This is something we 
may want to resurrect at a later time.

-- 
russell at coker.com.au
http://etbe.blogspot.com/          My Blog

http://www.coker.com.au/sponsorship.html Sponsoring Free Software development