[redhat-lspp] RE: [IPSEC] flow: Cache negative results

[Venkat Yekkirala]

> I haven't looked at the caller to xfrm_policy_lookup, but does it
> actually use the value that might be set if it gets an error? 

I don't think it uses the value when it gets an error.

>   aka does
> it really matter?

Probably not from a functional standpoint; only from a "correctness"
standpoint.

BTW, I see lspp63 doesn't include this patch:

http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg22569.html