RedHat 9 install on Maxtor SATA drive
Tom Diehl
tdiehl at rogueind.com
Sat Nov 12 05:27:54 UTC 2005
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Debbie Tropiano wrote:
> John & Saurabh -
>
> Thanks for the feedback about RH9 & SATA. Based on my web searching,
> I was afraid that it wouldn't work but was looking for some confirmation.
>
> The goal for RH9 is some consistency on our network. We run FC2/FC3 on
> all of our opteron systems (production servers, actually) but run RH9
> on our Intel boxes. The system that I need to load is an Intel box, so
> I wanted to stay consistent. But I guess I'll go with FC3 instead.
>
> OTOH we are looking at going with RHEL (4, I think) for our new cluster
> that will run Rocks. So yet more RH diversity on our network. :-)
If you want stability and consistency Have a look at CentOS. It is a rebuild of
RHEL. As such there will be a much longer useful life expectancy.
RHL anything is LONG past its expiration date for any new installations.
Regards,
Tom Diehl tdiehl at rogueind.com Spamtrap address mtd123 at rogueind.com
More information about the redhat-sysadmin-list
mailing list