From dmitry at athabascau.ca Tue Oct 11 21:10:23 2011 From: dmitry at athabascau.ca (Dmitry Makovey) Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:10:23 -0600 Subject: RHN problems? Message-ID: <201110111510.26681.dmitry@athabascau.ca> Hi everybody, I keep on getting File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/rhn/SSL.py", line 217, in write sent = self._connection.send(data) OpenSSL.SSL.SysCallError: (104, 'Connection reset by peer') trying to run yum on our RHEL5.x boxes. RH website mentions nothing about outage or maintenance. Is above message a result of recent SSL/Apache patching rounds or it's just an intermittent failure. -- Dmitry Makovey Web Systems Administrator Athabasca University (780) 675-6245 --- Confidence is what you have before you understand the problem Woody Allen When in trouble when in doubt run in circles scream and shout http://www.wordwizard.com/phpbb3/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=19330 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 190 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: From jbourne at hardrock.org Tue Oct 11 21:26:31 2011 From: jbourne at hardrock.org (Jim Bourne) Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:26:31 -0600 (MDT) Subject: RHN problems? In-Reply-To: <201110111510.26681.dmitry@athabascau.ca> References: <201110111510.26681.dmitry@athabascau.ca> Message-ID: I second this. Jim On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Dmitry Makovey wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > I keep on getting > > File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/rhn/SSL.py", line 217, in write > sent = self._connection.send(data) > OpenSSL.SSL.SysCallError: (104, 'Connection reset by peer') > > > trying to run yum on our RHEL5.x boxes. RH website mentions nothing about > outage or maintenance. Is above message a result of recent SSL/Apache patching > rounds or it's just an intermittent failure. > > -- James Bourne | Email: jbourne at hardrock.org UNIX Systems Administration | WWW: http://www.hardrock.org Custom UNIX Programming | Linux: The choice of a GNU generation ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "All you need's an occasional kick in the philosophy." Frank Herbert Need an inexpensive domain alternative? http://fastforwarddomains.com From marcobillpeter at redhat.com Tue Oct 11 21:37:24 2011 From: marcobillpeter at redhat.com (Marco Bill-Peter) Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:37:24 -0400 Subject: RHN problems? In-Reply-To: References: <201110111510.26681.dmitry@athabascau.ca> Message-ID: <4E94B714.7030606@redhat.com> Jim, Dimitry thanks for reporting this, but we're not aware of RHN related issues. Can you verify that you're not running into https://access.redhat.com/kb/docs/DOC-51374? if you still have issues, please file a support case with our organisation and we'll work with you to resolve thanks marco On 10/11/2011 05:26 PM, Jim Bourne wrote: > I second this. > > Jim > > On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Dmitry Makovey wrote: > >> >> Hi everybody, >> >> I keep on getting >> >> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/rhn/SSL.py", line 217, in write >> sent = self._connection.send(data) >> OpenSSL.SSL.SysCallError: (104, 'Connection reset by peer') >> >> >> trying to run yum on our RHEL5.x boxes. RH website mentions nothing about >> outage or maintenance. Is above message a result of recent SSL/Apache patching >> rounds or it's just an intermittent failure. >> >> > -- Marco Bill-Peter p 978-392-2495 c 617-818-0707 VP, Global Support Services Red Hat Access your subscription value! Support, Knowledgebase, Videos, Tech notes and more. The Red Hat Customer Portal: https://access.redhat.com/ From inode0 at gmail.com Tue Oct 11 21:43:45 2011 From: inode0 at gmail.com (inode0) Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:43:45 -0500 Subject: RHN problems? In-Reply-To: <4E94B714.7030606@redhat.com> References: <201110111510.26681.dmitry@athabascau.ca> <4E94B714.7030606@redhat.com> Message-ID: On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Marco Bill-Peter wrote: > Jim, Dimitry > > thanks for reporting this, but we're not aware of RHN related issues. Wow, we have seen nothing but these errors for the past 7.5 hours! > Can you verify that you're not running into > https://access.redhat.com/kb/docs/DOC-51374? > > if you still have issues, please file a support case with our organisation and > we'll work with you to resolve I think it goes well beyond any one organization. John From jbourne at hardrock.org Tue Oct 11 21:47:07 2011 From: jbourne at hardrock.org (Jim Bourne) Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:47:07 -0600 (MDT) Subject: RHN problems? In-Reply-To: <4E94B714.7030606@redhat.com> References: <201110111510.26681.dmitry@athabascau.ca> <4E94B714.7030606@redhat.com> Message-ID: This is from our proxy host, not from the clients. I'll send you an RHN Traceback seperately. Regards Jim On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Marco Bill-Peter wrote: > Jim, Dimitry > > thanks for reporting this, but we're not aware of RHN related issues. > > Can you verify that you're not running into > https://access.redhat.com/kb/docs/DOC-51374? > > if you still have issues, please file a support case with our organisation and > we'll work with you to resolve > > thanks > > marco > > > > On 10/11/2011 05:26 PM, Jim Bourne wrote: >> I second this. >> >> Jim >> >> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Dmitry Makovey wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi everybody, >>> >>> I keep on getting >>> >>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/rhn/SSL.py", line 217, in write >>> sent = self._connection.send(data) >>> OpenSSL.SSL.SysCallError: (104, 'Connection reset by peer') >>> >>> >>> trying to run yum on our RHEL5.x boxes. RH website mentions nothing about >>> outage or maintenance. Is above message a result of recent SSL/Apache patching >>> rounds or it's just an intermittent failure. >>> >>> >> > > -- James Bourne | Email: jbourne at hardrock.org UNIX Systems Administration | WWW: http://www.hardrock.org Custom UNIX Programming | Linux: The choice of a GNU generation ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "All you need's an occasional kick in the philosophy." Frank Herbert Need an inexpensive domain alternative? http://fastforwarddomains.com From erik.redding at txstate.edu Tue Oct 11 22:01:32 2011 From: erik.redding at txstate.edu (Redding, Erik) Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:01:32 -0500 Subject: RHN problems? In-Reply-To: References: <201110111510.26681.dmitry@athabascau.ca> <4E94B714.7030606@redhat.com> Message-ID: <61C3E18E-9CF6-4042-A45A-3CC55F0EF365@txstate.edu> I called them earlier and there's a known issue. I got a ticket put in and they've got no ETA on fix. Erik Redding Core Systems Services Texas State University-San Marcos On Oct 11, 2011, at 4:47 PM, Jim Bourne wrote: > This is from our proxy host, not from the clients. > > I'll send you an RHN Traceback seperately. > > Regards > Jim > > On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Marco Bill-Peter wrote: > >> Jim, Dimitry >> >> thanks for reporting this, but we're not aware of RHN related issues. >> >> Can you verify that you're not running into >> https://access.redhat.com/kb/docs/DOC-51374? >> >> if you still have issues, please file a support case with our organisation and >> we'll work with you to resolve >> >> thanks >> >> marco >> >> >> >> On 10/11/2011 05:26 PM, Jim Bourne wrote: >>> I second this. >>> >>> Jim >>> >>> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Dmitry Makovey wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Hi everybody, >>>> >>>> I keep on getting >>>> >>>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/rhn/SSL.py", line 217, in write >>>> sent = self._connection.send(data) >>>> OpenSSL.SSL.SysCallError: (104, 'Connection reset by peer') >>>> >>>> >>>> trying to run yum on our RHEL5.x boxes. RH website mentions nothing about >>>> outage or maintenance. Is above message a result of recent SSL/Apache patching >>>> rounds or it's just an intermittent failure. >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > > -- > James Bourne | Email: jbourne at hardrock.org > UNIX Systems Administration | WWW: http://www.hardrock.org > Custom UNIX Programming | Linux: The choice of a GNU generation > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > "All you need's an occasional kick in the philosophy." Frank Herbert > Need an inexpensive domain alternative? http://fastforwarddomains.com > > -- > redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list > redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 4897 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jbourne at hardrock.org Tue Oct 11 22:05:21 2011 From: jbourne at hardrock.org (Jim Bourne) Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:05:21 -0600 (MDT) Subject: RHN problems? In-Reply-To: <61C3E18E-9CF6-4042-A45A-3CC55F0EF365@txstate.edu> References: <201110111510.26681.dmitry@athabascau.ca> <4E94B714.7030606@redhat.com> <61C3E18E-9CF6-4042-A45A-3CC55F0EF365@txstate.edu> Message-ID: Thanks. On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Redding, Erik wrote: > I called them earlier and there's a known issue. I got a ticket put in and they've got no ETA on fix. > > > Erik Redding > Core Systems Services > Texas State University-San Marcos > > > > > > > On Oct 11, 2011, at 4:47 PM, Jim Bourne wrote: > >> This is from our proxy host, not from the clients. >> >> I'll send you an RHN Traceback seperately. >> >> Regards >> Jim >> >> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Marco Bill-Peter wrote: >> >>> Jim, Dimitry >>> >>> thanks for reporting this, but we're not aware of RHN related issues. >>> >>> Can you verify that you're not running into >>> https://access.redhat.com/kb/docs/DOC-51374? >>> >>> if you still have issues, please file a support case with our organisation and >>> we'll work with you to resolve >>> >>> thanks >>> >>> marco >>> >>> >>> >>> On 10/11/2011 05:26 PM, Jim Bourne wrote: >>>> I second this. >>>> >>>> Jim >>>> >>>> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Dmitry Makovey wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi everybody, >>>>> >>>>> I keep on getting >>>>> >>>>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/rhn/SSL.py", line 217, in write >>>>> sent = self._connection.send(data) >>>>> OpenSSL.SSL.SysCallError: (104, 'Connection reset by peer') >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> trying to run yum on our RHEL5.x boxes. RH website mentions nothing about >>>>> outage or maintenance. Is above message a result of recent SSL/Apache patching >>>>> rounds or it's just an intermittent failure. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> James Bourne | Email: jbourne at hardrock.org >> UNIX Systems Administration | WWW: http://www.hardrock.org >> Custom UNIX Programming | Linux: The choice of a GNU generation >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> "All you need's an occasional kick in the philosophy." Frank Herbert >> Need an inexpensive domain alternative? http://fastforwarddomains.com >> >> -- >> redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list >> redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list > > -- James Bourne | Email: jbourne at hardrock.org UNIX Systems Administration | WWW: http://www.hardrock.org Custom UNIX Programming | Linux: The choice of a GNU generation ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "All you need's an occasional kick in the philosophy." Frank Herbert Need an inexpensive domain alternative? http://fastforwarddomains.com From ben.kevan at gmail.com Tue Oct 11 22:09:07 2011 From: ben.kevan at gmail.com (Ben Kevan) Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:09:07 -0700 Subject: RHN problems? In-Reply-To: References: <201110111510.26681.dmitry@athabascau.ca> <4E94B714.7030606@redhat.com> <61C3E18E-9CF6-4042-A45A-3CC55F0EF365@txstate.edu> Message-ID: Maybe they need a big monitor that says "RHN services are down" so that all support personnel can see. Just saying. On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Jim Bourne wrote: > Thanks. > > > On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Redding, Erik wrote: > > I called them earlier and there's a known issue. I got a ticket put in >> and they've got no ETA on fix. >> >> >> Erik Redding >> Core Systems Services >> Texas State University-San Marcos >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Oct 11, 2011, at 4:47 PM, Jim Bourne wrote: >> >> This is from our proxy host, not from the clients. >>> >>> I'll send you an RHN Traceback seperately. >>> >>> Regards >>> Jim >>> >>> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Marco Bill-Peter wrote: >>> >>> Jim, Dimitry >>>> >>>> thanks for reporting this, but we're not aware of RHN related issues. >>>> >>>> Can you verify that you're not running into >>>> https://access.redhat.com/kb/**docs/DOC-51374 >>>> ? >>>> >>>> if you still have issues, please file a support case with our >>>> organisation and >>>> we'll work with you to resolve >>>> >>>> thanks >>>> >>>> marco >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 10/11/2011 05:26 PM, Jim Bourne wrote: >>>> >>>>> I second this. >>>>> >>>>> Jim >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Dmitry Makovey wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hi everybody, >>>>>> >>>>>> I keep on getting >>>>>> >>>>>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-**packages/rhn/SSL.py", line 217, in >>>>>> write >>>>>> sent = self._connection.send(data) >>>>>> OpenSSL.SSL.SysCallError: (104, 'Connection reset by peer') >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> trying to run yum on our RHEL5.x boxes. RH website mentions nothing >>>>>> about >>>>>> outage or maintenance. Is above message a result of recent SSL/Apache >>>>>> patching >>>>>> rounds or it's just an intermittent failure. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> James Bourne | Email: jbourne at hardrock.org >>> UNIX Systems Administration | WWW: http://www.hardrock.org >>> Custom UNIX Programming | Linux: The choice of a GNU generation >>> ------------------------------**------------------------------** >>> ---------- >>> "All you need's an occasional kick in the philosophy." Frank Herbert >>> Need an inexpensive domain alternative? http://fastforwarddomains.com >>> >>> -- >>> redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list >>> redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.**com >>> https://www.redhat.com/**mailman/listinfo/redhat-**sysadmin-list >>> >> >> >> > -- > James Bourne | Email: jbourne at hardrock.org > UNIX Systems Administration | WWW: http://www.hardrock.org > Custom UNIX Programming | Linux: The choice of a GNU generation > ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------- > "All you need's an occasional kick in the philosophy." Frank Herbert > Need an inexpensive domain alternative? http://fastforwarddomains.com > > -- > redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list > redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.**com > https://www.redhat.com/**mailman/listinfo/redhat-**sysadmin-list > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From marcobillpeter at redhat.com Tue Oct 11 22:10:55 2011 From: marcobillpeter at redhat.com (Marco Bill-Peter) Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:10:55 -0400 Subject: RHN problems? In-Reply-To: <4E94B714.7030606@redhat.com> References: <201110111510.26681.dmitry@athabascau.ca> <4E94B714.7030606@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4E94BEEF.4010500@redhat.com> Sorry all, I mis-spoke. There is an issue in the RHN network being worked on. We'll post an update to this list after resolution. thanks for the patience marco On 10/11/2011 05:37 PM, Marco Bill-Peter wrote: > Jim, Dimitry > > thanks for reporting this, but we're not aware of RHN related issues. > > Can you verify that you're not running into > https://access.redhat.com/kb/docs/DOC-51374? > > if you still have issues, please file a support case with our organisation and > we'll work with you to resolve > > thanks > > marco > > > > On 10/11/2011 05:26 PM, Jim Bourne wrote: >> I second this. >> >> Jim >> >> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Dmitry Makovey wrote: >> >>> Hi everybody, >>> >>> I keep on getting >>> >>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/rhn/SSL.py", line 217, in write >>> sent = self._connection.send(data) >>> OpenSSL.SSL.SysCallError: (104, 'Connection reset by peer') >>> >>> >>> trying to run yum on our RHEL5.x boxes. RH website mentions nothing about >>> outage or maintenance. Is above message a result of recent SSL/Apache patching >>> rounds or it's just an intermittent failure. >>> >>> -- Marco Bill-Peter p 978-392-2495 c 617-818-0707 VP, Global Support Services Red Hat Access your subscription value! Support, Knowledgebase, Videos, Tech notes and more. The Red Hat Customer Portal: https://access.redhat.com/ From jbourne at hardrock.org Tue Oct 11 22:14:20 2011 From: jbourne at hardrock.org (Jim Bourne) Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:14:20 -0600 (MDT) Subject: RHN problems? In-Reply-To: <4E94BEEF.4010500@redhat.com> References: <201110111510.26681.dmitry@athabascau.ca> <4E94B714.7030606@redhat.com> <4E94BEEF.4010500@redhat.com> Message-ID: Is there anyone that we, as subscribers, can go to see status updates? Thanks On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Marco Bill-Peter wrote: > Sorry all, I mis-spoke. > > There is an issue in the RHN network being worked on. We'll post an update to > this list after resolution. thanks for the patience > > marco > > On 10/11/2011 05:37 PM, Marco Bill-Peter wrote: >> Jim, Dimitry >> >> thanks for reporting this, but we're not aware of RHN related issues. >> >> Can you verify that you're not running into >> https://access.redhat.com/kb/docs/DOC-51374? >> >> if you still have issues, please file a support case with our organisation and >> we'll work with you to resolve >> >> thanks >> >> marco >> >> >> >> On 10/11/2011 05:26 PM, Jim Bourne wrote: >>> I second this. >>> >>> Jim >>> >>> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Dmitry Makovey wrote: >>> >>>> Hi everybody, >>>> >>>> I keep on getting >>>> >>>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/rhn/SSL.py", line 217, in write >>>> sent = self._connection.send(data) >>>> OpenSSL.SSL.SysCallError: (104, 'Connection reset by peer') >>>> >>>> >>>> trying to run yum on our RHEL5.x boxes. RH website mentions nothing about >>>> outage or maintenance. Is above message a result of recent SSL/Apache patching >>>> rounds or it's just an intermittent failure. >>>> >>>> > > -- James Bourne | Email: jbourne at hardrock.org UNIX Systems Administration | WWW: http://www.hardrock.org Custom UNIX Programming | Linux: The choice of a GNU generation ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "All you need's an occasional kick in the philosophy." Frank Herbert Need an inexpensive domain alternative? http://fastforwarddomains.com From marcobillpeter at redhat.com Tue Oct 11 23:02:49 2011 From: marcobillpeter at redhat.com (Marco Bill-Peter) Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 19:02:49 -0400 Subject: RHN problems? In-Reply-To: References: <201110111510.26681.dmitry@athabascau.ca> <4E94B714.7030606@redhat.com> <4E94BEEF.4010500@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4E94CB19.9010708@redhat.com> Folks, RHN should be fixed at this point. Please post here if you see continuing connection issues or file a case with support. Jim, Good suggestion with a status page. We'll make that happen going forward on the customer portal. regards, marco On 10/11/2011 06:14 PM, Jim Bourne wrote: > Is there anyone that we, as subscribers, can go to see status updates? > > Thanks > > On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Marco Bill-Peter wrote: > >> Sorry all, I mis-spoke. >> >> There is an issue in the RHN network being worked on. We'll post an update to >> this list after resolution. thanks for the patience >> >> marco >> >> On 10/11/2011 05:37 PM, Marco Bill-Peter wrote: >>> Jim, Dimitry >>> >>> thanks for reporting this, but we're not aware of RHN related issues. >>> >>> Can you verify that you're not running into >>> https://access.redhat.com/kb/docs/DOC-51374? >>> >>> if you still have issues, please file a support case with our organisation and >>> we'll work with you to resolve >>> >>> thanks >>> >>> marco >>> >>> >>> >>> On 10/11/2011 05:26 PM, Jim Bourne wrote: >>>> I second this. >>>> >>>> Jim >>>> >>>> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Dmitry Makovey wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi everybody, >>>>> >>>>> I keep on getting >>>>> >>>>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/rhn/SSL.py", line 217, in write >>>>> sent = self._connection.send(data) >>>>> OpenSSL.SSL.SysCallError: (104, 'Connection reset by peer') >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> trying to run yum on our RHEL5.x boxes. RH website mentions nothing about >>>>> outage or maintenance. Is above message a result of recent SSL/Apache >>>>> patching >>>>> rounds or it's just an intermittent failure. >>>>> >>>>> >> >> > -- Marco Bill-Peter p 978-392-2495 c 617-818-0707 VP, Global Support Services Red Hat Access your subscription value! Support, Knowledgebase, Videos, Tech notes and more. The Red Hat Customer Portal: https://access.redhat.com/ From bda20 at cam.ac.uk Wed Oct 12 07:44:59 2011 From: bda20 at cam.ac.uk (Ben) Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 08:44:59 +0100 (BST) Subject: RHN problems? In-Reply-To: References: <201110111510.26681.dmitry@athabascau.ca> <4E94B714.7030606@redhat.com> <4E94BEEF.4010500@redhat.com> Message-ID: There used to be a rhn-outages-list at redhat.com, but I think it stopped working (-: A web page (for example: http://rhn.redhat.com/status) would be a very good idea and gets a thumbs up from me. Ben On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Jim Bourne wrote: > Is there anyone that we, as subscribers, can go to see status updates? > > Thanks > > On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Marco Bill-Peter wrote: > >> Sorry all, I mis-spoke. >> >> There is an issue in the RHN network being worked on. We'll post an >> update to this list after resolution. thanks for the patience >> >> marco >> >> On 10/11/2011 05:37 PM, Marco Bill-Peter wrote: >>> Jim, Dimitry >>> >>> thanks for reporting this, but we're not aware of RHN related issues. >>> >>> Can you verify that you're not running into >>> https://access.redhat.com/kb/docs/DOC-51374? >>> >>> if you still have issues, please file a support case with our >>> organisation and we'll work with you to resolve >>> >>> thanks >>> >>> marco >>> >>> >>> >>> On 10/11/2011 05:26 PM, Jim Bourne wrote: >>>> I second this. >>>> >>>> Jim >>>> >>>> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Dmitry Makovey wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi everybody, >>>>> >>>>> I keep on getting >>>>> >>>>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/rhn/SSL.py", line 217, in write >>>>> sent = self._connection.send(data) >>>>> OpenSSL.SSL.SysCallError: (104, 'Connection reset by peer') >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> trying to run yum on our RHEL5.x boxes. RH website mentions nothing >>>>> about outage or maintenance. Is above message a result of recent >>>>> SSL/Apache patching rounds or it's just an intermittent failure. From cmadams at hiwaay.net Wed Oct 12 14:24:22 2011 From: cmadams at hiwaay.net (Chris Adams) Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:24:22 -0500 Subject: RHN problems? In-Reply-To: <4E94CB19.9010708@redhat.com> References: <201110111510.26681.dmitry@athabascau.ca> <4E94B714.7030606@redhat.com> <4E94BEEF.4010500@redhat.com> <4E94CB19.9010708@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20111012142422.GB14206@hiwaay.net> Once upon a time, Marco Bill-Peter said: > Folks, > > RHN should be fixed at this point. Please post here if you see continuing > connection issues or file a case with support. It appears HTTP access (e.g. with "useNoSSLForPackages=1" set in /etc/sysconfig/rhn/up2date) is broken. With that set, a "yum list updates" returns: Error: failed to retrieve repodata/eb9c556bbfb5deb6368eaa43b9b68af3a8d806dc-primary.xml.gz from rhel-x86_64-server-5 error was [Errno 14] HTTP Error 503: Service Unavailable > Jim, Good suggestion with a status page. We'll make that happen going forward on > the customer portal. I would suggest the status page be outside any login; ideally, it would be separate as much as practical from other Red Hat sites (maybe "status.redhat.com"?). Thanks for your response here about RHN issues. -- Chris Adams Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. From robinprice at gmail.com Wed Oct 12 17:56:07 2011 From: robinprice at gmail.com (robinprice at gmail.com) Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:56:07 -0400 Subject: RHN problems? In-Reply-To: <20111012142422.GB14206@hiwaay.net> References: <201110111510.26681.dmitry@athabascau.ca> <4E94B714.7030606@redhat.com> <4E94BEEF.4010500@redhat.com> <4E94CB19.9010708@redhat.com> <20111012142422.GB14206@hiwaay.net> Message-ID: Chris, The RHN outage that was ongoing yesterday has been resolved. I have not run into this issue on any of my RHEL5/6 installs. This may be directly related to the following knowledge base: Operations such as satellite-sync and yum update fail with "503 Service Temporarily Unavailable" error when connecting to RHN hosted https://access.redhat.com/kb/docs/DOC-52689 Root Cause * This is a temporary issue. * The error appears when the parent RHN Server (satellite.rhn.redhat.com) is busy serving too many requests * This is seen during a major update release (for e.g RHEL 5.4, RHEL 4.8 etc) This may have been the issue you ran into when RHN came back online. Can you try again now that RHN has been up and running? If you get this same message, I would suggest contacting GSS and filing a support case. If you do this, please let me know, and I will be happy to follow-up in the case for you. ~rp On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Marco Bill-Peter said: >> Folks, >> >> RHN should be fixed at this point. Please post here if you see continuing >> connection issues or file a case with support. > > It appears HTTP access (e.g. with "useNoSSLForPackages=1" set in > /etc/sysconfig/rhn/up2date) is broken. ?With that set, a "yum list > updates" returns: > > Error: failed to retrieve repodata/eb9c556bbfb5deb6368eaa43b9b68af3a8d806dc-primary.xml.gz from rhel-x86_64-server-5 > error was [Errno 14] HTTP Error 503: Service Unavailable > >> Jim, Good suggestion with a status page. We'll make that happen going forward on >> the customer portal. > > I would suggest the status page be outside any login; ideally, it would > be separate as much as practical from other Red Hat sites (maybe > "status.redhat.com"?). > > Thanks for your response here about RHN issues. > -- > Chris Adams > Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services > I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. > > -- > redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list > redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list > From cmadams at hiwaay.net Wed Oct 12 18:44:37 2011 From: cmadams at hiwaay.net (Chris Adams) Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:44:37 -0500 Subject: RHN problems? In-Reply-To: References: <201110111510.26681.dmitry@athabascau.ca> <4E94B714.7030606@redhat.com> <4E94BEEF.4010500@redhat.com> <4E94CB19.9010708@redhat.com> <20111012142422.GB14206@hiwaay.net> Message-ID: <20111012184437.GD14206@hiwaay.net> Once upon a time, robinprice at gmail.com said: > The RHN outage that was ongoing yesterday has been resolved. I have > not run into this issue on any of my RHEL5/6 installs. This may be > directly related to the following knowledge base: Nope, it isn't any of those; it is specific to useNoSSLForPackages. I'm guessing that yesterday Red Hat made some change to how RHN handles RHEL 5 updates, and now it suffers from the same problem as RHEL 6 and useNoSSLForPackages. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652424 If I disable location-aware updates, useNoSSLForPackages works again on RHEL 5. It would be nice if Red Hat could announce when infrastructure changes were being made, so customers don't have to guess. -- Chris Adams Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. From robinprice at gmail.com Wed Oct 12 20:37:12 2011 From: robinprice at gmail.com (robinprice at gmail.com) Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:37:12 -0400 Subject: RHN problems? In-Reply-To: <20111012184437.GD14206@hiwaay.net> References: <201110111510.26681.dmitry@athabascau.ca> <4E94B714.7030606@redhat.com> <4E94BEEF.4010500@redhat.com> <4E94CB19.9010708@redhat.com> <20111012142422.GB14206@hiwaay.net> <20111012184437.GD14206@hiwaay.net> Message-ID: Chris, I agree. I will voice your concern internally as there is an internal discussion about the requests with-in this thread. I have clone the bug for your convenience for RHEL5. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745615 ~rp On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, robinprice at gmail.com said: >> The RHN outage that was ongoing yesterday has been resolved. ?I have >> not run into this issue on any of my RHEL5/6 installs. ?This may be >> directly related to the following knowledge base: > > Nope, it isn't any of those; it is specific to useNoSSLForPackages. ?I'm > guessing that yesterday Red Hat made some change to how RHN handles RHEL > 5 updates, and now it suffers from the same problem as RHEL 6 and > useNoSSLForPackages. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652424 > > If I disable location-aware updates, useNoSSLForPackages works again on > RHEL 5. > > It would be nice if Red Hat could announce when infrastructure changes > were being made, so customers don't have to guess. > > -- > Chris Adams > Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services > I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. > > -- > redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list > redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list > From cmadams at hiwaay.net Wed Oct 12 21:47:30 2011 From: cmadams at hiwaay.net (Chris Adams) Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:47:30 -0500 Subject: RHN problems? In-Reply-To: References: <201110111510.26681.dmitry@athabascau.ca> <4E94B714.7030606@redhat.com> <4E94BEEF.4010500@redhat.com> <4E94CB19.9010708@redhat.com> <20111012142422.GB14206@hiwaay.net> <20111012184437.GD14206@hiwaay.net> Message-ID: <20111012214730.GA15398@hiwaay.net> Once upon a time, robinprice at gmail.com said: > I agree. I will voice your concern internally as there is an internal > discussion about the requests with-in this thread. Thanks, and thanks for being on this list. I know the mailing lists are not in any way an official support channel, so I always appreciate when Red Hat folks help out. Also sorry for "writing angry" (as a co-worker calls it, especially when he hears me typing on my clicky IBM-type keyboard). I shouldn't write emails when I'm grumpy; I tend to go back and re-read them later and wish I'd said things better (especially when somebody is trying to help!). -- Chris Adams Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. From robinprice at gmail.com Wed Oct 12 22:31:26 2011 From: robinprice at gmail.com (robinprice at gmail.com) Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:31:26 -0400 Subject: RHN problems? In-Reply-To: <20111012214730.GA15398@hiwaay.net> References: <201110111510.26681.dmitry@athabascau.ca> <4E94B714.7030606@redhat.com> <4E94BEEF.4010500@redhat.com> <4E94CB19.9010708@redhat.com> <20111012142422.GB14206@hiwaay.net> <20111012184437.GD14206@hiwaay.net> <20111012214730.GA15398@hiwaay.net> Message-ID: Chris, Not a problem. If you have any other issues, please feel free to reach out to GSS and through our Customer Portal user groups. We are always here and listening. Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention and hope you have a wonderful day! :) ~rp On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, robinprice at gmail.com said: >> I agree. ?I will voice your concern internally as there is an internal >> discussion about the requests with-in this thread. > > Thanks, and thanks for being on this list. ?I know the mailing lists are > not in any way an official support channel, so I always appreciate when > Red Hat folks help out. > > Also sorry for "writing angry" (as a co-worker calls it, especially when > he hears me typing on my clicky IBM-type keyboard). ?I shouldn't write > emails when I'm grumpy; I tend to go back and re-read them later and > wish I'd said things better (especially when somebody is trying to > help!). > > -- > Chris Adams > Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services > I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. > From Neill.Flynn at itg.com Wed Oct 26 22:04:44 2011 From: Neill.Flynn at itg.com (Flynn, Neill) Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 23:04:44 +0100 Subject: helloworld module Message-ID: <03AD8F255D6D244E8902D8F92C6EA84309FD3D1C@MSG-EX01-EUR.wineur.itgeurope.com> Hi all, Not strictly a redhat issue as such.....but I'm really stuck, tried to google the issue and just got more and more confused (after 3 days going in circles). I need to compile a kernel with a new helloworld module..... I have done the following... me at linux1a:/usr/src/linux-3.0.4/kernel$ sudo vi helloworld.c #include #include asmlinkage int sys_helloworld() { printk(KERN_EMERG "hello_world!"); return 1; } me at linux1a:/usr/src/linux-3.0.4/kernel$ sudo vi Makefile obj-y += helloworld.o melinux1a:/usr/src/linux-3.0.4/arch/x86/kernel$ sudo vi /usr/src/linux-3.0.4/arch/x86/kernel/syscall_table_32.S .long sys_sendmmsg /* 345 */ .long sys_setns .long sys_helloworld me at linux1a:/usr/src/linux-3.0.4$ sudo vi /usr/src/linux-3.0.4/arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_32.h changed: #define __NR_open_by_handle_at 342 #define __NR_clock_adjtime 343 #define __NR_syncfs 344 #define __NR_sendmmsg 345 #define __NR_setns 346 #ifdef __KERNEL__ #define NR_syscalls 347 to: #define __NR_open_by_handle_at 342 #define __NR_clock_adjtime 343 #define __NR_syncfs 344 #define __NR_sendmmsg 345 #define __NR_setns 346 #define __NR_helloworld 347 #ifdef __KERNEL__ #define NR_syscalls 348 Note the two changes in the above file.... 1)added: #define __NR_helloworld 347 2) changed: #define NR_syscalls 347 to: #define NR_syscalls 348 me at linux1a:/usr/src/linux-3.0.4$ sudo vi /usr/src/linux-3.0.4/arch/x86/include/asm/syscalls.h changed: /* X86_32 only */ #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 to: /* X86_32 only */ #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 asmlinkage int sys_helloworld(); when I go to make the kernel, I get: me at linux1a:/usr/src/linux-3.0.4$ date; sudo make; date Wed Oct 26 23:35:26 IST 2011 CHK include/linux/version.h CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh CHK include/generated/compile.h VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-int80-syms.lds VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-sysenter-syms.lds VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-syms.lds LD arch/x86/vdso/built-in.o LD arch/x86/built-in.o LD kernel/built-in.o CC [M] kernel/helloworld.o kernel/helloworld.c:3:16: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype LD vmlinux.o MODPOST vmlinux.o WARNING: modpost: Found 3 section mismatch(es). To see full details build your kernel with: 'make CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y' GEN .version CHK include/generated/compile.h UPD include/generated/compile.h CC init/version.o LD init/built-in.o LD .tmp_vmlinux1 arch/x86/built-in.o: In function `sys_call_table': (.rodata+0x58c): undefined reference to `sys_helloworld' make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 Wed Oct 26 23:41:07 IST 2011 As I've said, I'm stuck, if this is the wrong list, please ignore with my apologies. If anyone can help, thanks in advance. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- This message is for the named person's use only. This communication is for informational purposes only and has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but it is not necessarily complete and its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or as an official confirmation of any transaction. Moreover, this material should not be construed to contain any recommendation regarding, or opinion concerning, any security. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorized to state them to be the views of any such entity. Securities products and services provided to Canadian investors are offered by ITG Canada Corp. (member CIPF and IIROC - Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada), an affiliate of Investment Technology Group, Inc. Investment research products and services are produced and offered by ITG Investment Research, Inc. and not ITG Inc. (a FINRA member firm and SIPC member). ITG Inc. and/or its affiliates reserves the right to monitor and archive all electronic communications through its network. ITG Inc. Member FINRA, SIPC ITG? is a global brand that, in Europe, refers to Investment Technology Group Limited (?ITGL?) (Registered in Ireland No. 283940) and/or its wholly owned subsidiary, Investment Technology Group Europe Limited (?ITGEL?) (Registered in Ireland No. 283939). ITGL and ITGEL are authorised by the Central Bank of Ireland under the European Communities (Markets in Financial Instruments) Regulations, 2007 (as amended) and provide services within other member states of the European Community under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive. ITGL is a member of the London Stock Exchange, Euronext and Deutsche B?rse and operates POSIT?, the multilateral trading facility. ITGEL London Branch is authorised by the UK Financial Services Authority whilst ITGEL French Branch is authorised by the Banque de France. ITG may monitor traffic data of both business and personal e-mails. By replying to this e-mail, you consent to ITG monitoring the content of any e-mails you send to or receive from ITG.