From mitkany at gmail.com Thu Jan 2 00:24:09 2014 From: mitkany at gmail.com (Dimitar Georgievski) Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2014 19:24:09 -0500 Subject: RHEL Load Balancer Add-on vs KeepAlived Message-ID: Hello, I've started reviewing HA solution for HAProxy and trying to decide between RHEL HA Add-on and KeeAlived. Just curious if anyone had a chance to use any of these technologies in a production environment? I would love to learn what your experience with these technologies is in terms of management, scaling, troubleshooting, and monitoring. I am leaning towards RHEL Add-on at the moment because a better documentation, simpler architecture, set-up and management. This project also appears to me to be more active compared to KeepAlived, but I might be wrong. Thanks, Dimitar -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: