[rhelv6-list] selinux (not quite) disabled?

[solarflow99]

On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 8:06 AM,  <Greg_Swift at aotx.uscourts.gov> wrote:
> Obviously a server is likely to have more than just an out of the box
> configuration.
>
> But anyways... if i remember correctly, wasn't one of the changes in the
> RHEL6 SELinux the ability to section off where SELinux is enforcing versus
> not, so that it isn't an all or nothing thing?

ya, I think it is unconfined_t.  Fedora has had it for a long time
now.  I sure wouldn't want to turn selinux off on a production server.