[rhelv6-list] selinux (not quite) disabled?

Lamar Owen lowen at pari.edu
Tue Dec 7 15:17:43 UTC 2010


On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 01:56:30 am Mark Chappell wrote:
> If
> people start reporting problems with the policy I doubt it would take
> long before we had something that rarely ever broke, with programs
> gaining new functionality (and thus needing extra allow rules) being
> the general cause.

Agreed completely; bugs cannot be fixed if they're not reported.  Yes, it does take some time.  But since the OS is free, a little time to help improve is a small cost, IMHO.




More information about the rhelv6-list mailing list