[rhelv6-list] Redhat 6 New Pricing Scheme = crap

[Prentice Bisbal]

Not *that* big a deal.


On 12/09/2010 12:34 PM, Marti, Robert J wrote:
> Support includes the yum repos. Getting things like 5.6 around a month faster than CentOS is a big deal. Up to you if it's worth it.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Dec 9, 2010, at 11:28 AM, "Digimer"<linux at alteeve.com>  wrote:
>
>> On 12/09/2010 12:17 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
>>> Once upon a time, Don Hoover<dxh at yahoo.com>   said:
>>>> Has everyone seen the totally new pricing scheme for RHEL6?
>>>
>>> For those of us on the Basic end, any pretense of support is gone as
>>> well (it is now "self-support"), but the price didn't change.
>>
>> Doesn't that kind of defeat the point of paying for Red Hat vs using
>> CentOS? I thought the whole idea of RHEL was the support...
>>