[rhelv6-list] Problems resizing tmpfs under RHEL6
carlopmart
carlopmart at gmail.com
Wed Feb 23 10:47:46 UTC 2011
On 02/23/2011 11:28 AM, Udo wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 23.02.2011, 10:13 +0100 schrieb carlopmart:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> it is a freshly installed RHEL6-x86_64 from iso without updates.
>>> The changes are only in /etc/fstab, as you can see above, and a remount command.
>>>
>>> Udo
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Do you need to execute remount command after host is up?? I need to run every time
>> when laptop is up.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>
> Oh sorry,
>
> I didn't realized that you only have the problem after a reboot.
> After a reboot I have the same effect.
>
> But the following patch correct it.
> The backshlashes marks the linebreak.
>
> --- /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit.orig 2010-09-01 18:15:50.000000000 +0200
> +++ /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit 2011-02-23 11:07:12.544475820 +0100
> @@ -487,7 +487,7 @@
> mount -f /proc>/dev/null 2>&1
> mount -f /sys>/dev/null 2>&1
> mount -f /dev/pts>/dev/null 2>&1
> - mount -f /dev/shm>/dev/null 2>&1
> + #mount -f /dev/shm>/dev/null 2>&1
> mount -f /proc/bus/usb>/dev/null 2>&1
> fi
>
> @@ -495,7 +495,7 @@
> # mounted). Contrary to standard usage,
> # filesystems are NOT unmounted in single user mode.
> if [ "$READONLY" != "yes" ] ; then
> - action $"Mounting local filesystems: " mount -a -t \
> nonfs,nfs4,smbfs,ncpfs,cifs,gfs,gfs2 -O no_netdev
> + action $"Mounting local filesystems: " mount -a -t \
> tmpfs,nonfs,nfs4,smbfs,ncpfs,cifs,gfs,gfs2 -O no_netdev
> else
> action $"Mounting local filesystems: " mount -a -n -t \
> nonfs,nfs4,smbfs,ncpfs,cifs,gfs,gfs2 -O no_netdev
> fi
>
>
> If the mount point is different, it works as expected after a reboot
> (unpatched rc.sysinit).
>
> cat /etc/fstab |grep tmpfs
> tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs defaults,size=66% 0 0
> tmpfs /mnt/tmpfs tmpfs defaults,size=33% 0 0
>
> df -h | grep tmpfs
> tmpfs 1,5G 26M 1,5G 2% /dev/shm
> tmpfs 984M 0 984M 0% /mnt/tmpfs
>
>
> It's a bug or a feature?
>
>
> The command /bin/mount -o remount /dev/shm
> in /etc/rc.d/rc.local solve your problem.
>
>
> Udo
>
>
In my opinion it is a bug, because under RHEL5.x works perfectly.
Many thanks Udo.
--
CL Martinez
carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com
More information about the rhelv6-list
mailing list