[rhelv6-list] You suggestion for 'big' filesystem management Best Practice?

[Greg Swift]

Sorry I figured with 6.2 coming up it might be closer to getting out of tech
preview, but I just reviewed the notes and its not so... oops :)

On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:48, Musayev, Ilya <imusayev at webmd.net> wrote:

> RHEL6 has btrfs as tech-preview. I've been burned by tech previews before.
> Also, if you recall there was a talk by FC15 maintainers and how they turned
> away btrfs as main FS for OS due to instability.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rhelv6-list-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:
> rhelv6-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan S Billings
> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 1:26 PM
> To: rhelv6-list at redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [rhelv6-list] You suggestion for 'big' filesystem management
> Best Practice?
>
> On 10/28/2011 01:11 PM, Greg Swift wrote:
> > actually on that note... i believe RHEL 6 has btrfs support now too,
> > doesn't it?
>
> Well, if you're concerned about having a long fsck time, btrfs is the
> solution, because there isn't a release-quality fsck for btrfs yet. :)
>
> --
> Jonathan Billings <jsbillin at umich.edu>
> College of Engineering - CAEN - Unix and Linux Support
>
> _______________________________________________
> rhelv6-list mailing list
> rhelv6-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-list
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rhelv6-list mailing list
> rhelv6-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/rhelv6-list/attachments/20111028/ce5e71dc/attachment.htm>