[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [rhelv6-list] You suggestion for 'big' filesystem management Best Practice?



Sorry I figured with 6.2 coming up it might be closer to getting out of tech preview, but I just reviewed the notes and its not so... oops :)

On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:48, Musayev, Ilya <imusayev webmd net> wrote:
RHEL6 has btrfs as tech-preview. I've been burned by tech previews before. Also, if you recall there was a talk by FC15 maintainers and how they turned away btrfs as main FS for OS due to instability.

-----Original Message-----
From: rhelv6-list-bounces redhat com [mailto:rhelv6-list-bounces redhat com] On Behalf Of Jonathan S Billings
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 1:26 PM
To: rhelv6-list redhat com
Subject: Re: [rhelv6-list] You suggestion for 'big' filesystem management Best Practice?

On 10/28/2011 01:11 PM, Greg Swift wrote:
> actually on that note... i believe RHEL 6 has btrfs support now too,
> doesn't it?

Well, if you're concerned about having a long fsck time, btrfs is the
solution, because there isn't a release-quality fsck for btrfs yet. :)

--
Jonathan Billings <jsbillin umich edu>
College of Engineering - CAEN - Unix and Linux Support

_______________________________________________
rhelv6-list mailing list
rhelv6-list redhat com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-list



_______________________________________________
rhelv6-list mailing list
rhelv6-list redhat com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-list


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]