[rhelv6-list] 6.4 anyone?

[Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 (Santiago) discussion mailing-list]

I'm not offended, and took the time to post today (normally I let most
things go).  And in the future, if this comes up again, just refer
people to my recent post [1], or a better one from the archives.

-- bjs

[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv6-list/2013-February/msg00023.html


On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 (Santiago)
discussion mailing-list <rhelv6-list at redhat.com> wrote:
> Please excuse this last superfluous message on this thread.
>
> I would like to apologize to anyone who was offended by my replies to this
> posting. I never intended to suggest or imply that the Red Hat process was
> broken, I just got to musing about the current process when the topic came
> up. As an administrator in an academic setting we are very grateful for Red
> Hat's continued support with the academic programs.
> When replying to the original post, I did not search the archives to see if
> my opinions had been expressed before on this list and I apologize for that
> and the resulting chatter. In the future I will endeavour to keep my musings
> to myself.