[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: xulrunner-1.9.1.1-1.fc11.x86_64 update pulls in i586 packages



On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 07:28 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:17:55 -0400, Braden wrote:
> 
> > On 7/23/09 12:13 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:55:57 -0400, Braden wrote:
> > >
> > >> Is the problem that the gecko-libs dependency is not arch-specific?  How
> > >> do we fix that?
> > >
> > > You could make it arch-specific by depending on gecko-libs%{?_isa} = ...
> > 
> > This doesn't Just Work; it seems that the provider of gecko-libs needs 
> > to make it arch-specific as well.
> > 
> > I've filed bug 517665 against xulrunner and bug 517666 against 
> > java-1.6.0-openjdk.
> 
> Yes, the %{?_isa} Provides get automatically created (even for F11) for
> physical packages, 
> 
>   $ rpm -q --provides gtk2|grep ^gtk
>   gtk2 = 2.16.5-1.fc11
>   gtk2(x86-32) = 2.16.5-1.fc11
> 
> but not for virtual ones. gecko-libs and gecko-devel are *still* only
> virtual packages defined manually within the xulrunner.spec

So is there a reason why that must be the case?

It's been suggested (by Christopher Aillon in bug 517665) that not
automatically generating the arch-specific provides is a bug in
rpmbuild.

-- 
Braden McDaniel <braden endoframe com>


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]