[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Non-responsive maintainer process for kurzawa / Krzysztof Kurzawski



Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Well, that confirms my point of view. According to that thread, he replied
> 9 days later, said he had been on vacation. He orphaned a few packages
> even. That single "sign of life" wiped away all the concerns.

IMHO, a consecutive week or longer without being online (there are usually 
ways to check your mail when on vacation, if not, see the next point) and 
with no preannouncement (that's what the Vacation page in the wiki is for!) 
is enough to constitute non-responsiveness on its own (especially if it's a 
planned vacation, not some kind of accident).

        Kevin Kofler


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]