[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Version of rhpl appears to be later in F11 than in Rawhide

On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 23:38 +0100, Quentin Armitage wrote:
> My Rawhide system has rhpl version 0.221-1.i586 installed. The current
> version in Rawhide is 0.220-2.i686,  and so it appears that the version
> number in Rawhide is behind that in F11.

Looks like a change was committed to the F-11 branch but not the devel
branch.  I've fixed this.

> Is there further an issue here, and also with some other packages, where
> the Fedora version is not included in the package name, since it appears
> to me it would be possible for package names to be duplicated, one for
> example from F11 and one from Rawide/F12? 

dist tag is not requires.  Those that choose not to use the dist tag
choose to manage version-release themselves in such a way to not have

Jesse Keating
Fedora -- FreedomĀ² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]