[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Xinetd resurrection

On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 1:24 AM, Matej Cepl <mcepl redhat com> wrote:
> Martin Langhoff, Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:29:48 +0200:
>> In other words, xinetd is a saviour when you are running OLPC's School
>> Servers :-)
> That's not the point Steve was trying to make (I guess) ... what you need
> could be easily as well accomplished by its predecessory inetd server

I've used both. xinetd has lots of useful features (conf.d-style
config, rate limiting, etc). My understanding was that it aimed at
being a better inetd, and within those goals, it definitily does the
trick. And anyone taking on xinetd maintainership has my respect and a
few beers next time we meet.

Maybe inetd has grown all those same features in the meantime? If it
does, the manpage I have at hand right now doesn't know about it.



> which does bascially the same thing (and is default on Debian for
> example, http://packages.debian.org/sid/inetutils-inetd).
> Matěj
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

 martin langhoff gmail com
 martin laptop org -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]