[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Opinions on packaging ATLAS (for the x86 architecture)



On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Jonathan Underwood
<jonathan underwood gmail com> wrote:

>
> Would it not be best to have the default package using the default
> CFLAGS for consistency with the rest of the distribution, and the
> subpackages being variants which override the CFLAGS?
>
This is a different issue altogether. Even if atlas is made to used
the default CFLAGS, it will still attempt to build for a particular
CPU (either for the archictetural default passed to it at build time
or the hardware on which it is being built), that's how the package
was designed.

Deji
> Jonathan
>
> ps. Any recent thoughts on BZ 478856?
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]