[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: status of forked zlibs in rsync and zsync



On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 08:15 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Josephine Tannhäuser <josephine tannhauser googlemail com> said:
> > 2009/9/29 Rahul Sundaram <sundaram fedoraproject org>
> > > Bundling a library is not ideal but removing rsync would be a extreme step.
> > I believe this isn't a technical problem, more a psychological one. Fedora
> > is a (software) technic orientated project, or?
> 
> Since rsync is used in the distribution of Fedora, removing it _would_
> be a technical problem.

and the reason we (QA) want it added to Fedora is so we can use it in
the distribution of Fedora...

(we want to use it to allow people to reduce the size of nightly live
image downloads).

The point is that the initial meeting specified that neither rsync nor
zsync would be allowed to use an internal copy of zlib. Yet rsync is
still using one, zsync is still apparently not allowed in, and no-one
wants to do anything about it but argue.

-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]