[rhn-users] Upgrade 9.0 to RHEL 3.0

Knutsen, Mark Mark.Knutsen at nasdaq.com
Tue Dec 28 14:54:32 UTC 2004


The RHEL3 U4 updates produced one dependency problem with a leftover
package from RHL9. To fix, do:

  rpm -e libxslt-python

before running up2date.

See below for the rest of the packages you should remove from a RHL9
system before attempting an upgrade:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com
[mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com]
> On Behalf Of Knutsen, Mark
> Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 9:28 AM
> To: Red Hat Network Users List
> Subject: RE: [rhn-users] Upgrade 9.0 to RHEL 3.0
> 
> Today's new ruby packages cause a dependency problem with two packages
> left over from RHL9. To fix, do:
> 
>   rpm -e irb ruby-tcltk
> 
> before running up2date.
> 
> New alphabetized list of RHL9 packages to remove before attempting
> RHL9 -> RHEL3 WS upgrade:
> 
>   ddskk-xemacs desktop-printing galeon glibc-debug irb jdkgcj koffice
>   krb5-server mozilla-devel openssl-perl php-devel php-manual php-snmp
>   pwlib-devel qt-ODBC qt-PostgreSQL qtcups ruby-tcltk subversion
>   subversion-devel
> 
> ...and don't forget to remove old redhat-release and install new
> redhat-release-3WS after the upgrade! See Step 4 below:
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com
[mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com]
> On Behalf Of Knutsen, Mark
> Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 1:56 PM
> To: Red Hat Network Users List
> Subject: RE: [rhn-users] Upgrade 9.0 to RHEL 3.0
> 
> This just in: Libraries in the new RHEL3 "httpd-" and
> "httpd-devel-2.0.46-32.ent.3" packages conflict with those from
> "subversion" and "subversion-devel" in RHL9, so add these to the list
of
> packages to remove before upgrading if you want the later up2date to
> succeed:
> 
>   subversion subversion-devel
> 
> This sort of thing happens periodically as Red Hat updates packages.
> Conflicts are created with packages that used to exist in RHL9 and no
> longer exist in RHEL3 (at least not in the WS version that I use). The
> simple fix is to remove the older packages.
> 
> Of course, if you really need Subversion (or Koffice, or Galeon, etc.)
> you'll either need to --force something, find a third-party package
that
> doesn't conflict, or compile from source.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com
> > [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com]On Behalf Of Knutsen, Mark
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 10:18 AM
> > To: Red Hat Network Users List
> > Subject: RE: [rhn-users] Upgrade 9.0 to RHEL 3.0
> >
> >
> > True, but I've been led to believe that "avoiding use of
> > unnecessary --force" (sorry) is desirable.
> >
> > Note that in a followup I fixed duplicate package names in step 1.
> > I think this is a minimal list of RHL9 packages that need to
> > be removed before the upgrade:
> >
> >    rpm -e openssl-perl pwlib-devel krb5-server php-manual
> >           mozilla-devel galeon koffice qtcups desktop-printing
> >           ddskk-xemacs
> >
> > Also, there is no Step 5. It's intentionally left blank.
> > I used to work for IBM ;-)
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com
> > > [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com]On Behalf Of Dan Wittenberg
> > > Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 6:27 PM
> > > To: Red Hat Network Users List
> > > Subject: RE: [rhn-users] Upgrade 9.0 to RHEL 3.0
> > >
> > >
> > > This appears to be basically the same, except instead of
> > doing a force
> > > to over-write the redhat-release you just remove/install.
> > Should work
> > > the same either way unless I missed something else.
> > >
> > > Dan
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 10:27, Knutsen, Mark wrote:
> > > > OK, I've been putting off posting this way too long...
> > > >
> > > > Here's an alternative procedure I developed for upgrading
> > > to RHEL3 WS U2. This doesn't require use of the RPM "--force"
> > > parameter, so it's probably safer than that method in the
archives.
> > > >
> > > > 1) Prior to upgrade, remove packages that will cause
> > > dependency problems. This command is one long line:
> > > >
> > > >    rpm -e openssl-perl pwlib-devel krb5-server php-manual
> > > mozilla-devel
> > > >           galeon koffice krb5-server php-manual
> > > mozilla-devel galeon cups
> > > >           redhat-lsb qtcups desktop-printing ddskk-xemacs
> > > >
> > > > I have a longer list of packages from earlier Red Hat
> > > versions, but I think this will suffice for RHL9. It may not
> > > work with systems that have been upgraded to RHL9 from
> > > earlier Red Hat releases.
> > > >
> > > > 2) Perform upgrade by typing "linux upgradeany" after
> > booting CD #1.
> > > >
> > > > 3) Your first boot after the upgrade should be to
> > > single-user mode. Via GRUB, hit "e" to edit boot entry,
> > > highlight "kernel" line and hit "e" again, add the word "
> > > single" to the end of the line, hit Enter, hit "b". Don't
> > > worry, this is a one-time change.
> > > >
> > > > 4) The redhat-release package has changed names. Pop in CD #1
and:
> > > >
> > > >    mount /mnt/cdrom
> > > >    rpm -e redhat-release
> > > >    rpm -ivh /mnt/cdrom/RedHat/RPMS/redhat-release*
> > > >    eject
> > > >    shutdown -r now
> > > >
> > > > 6) In multiuser mode, register with RHN and attempt to run
> > > up2date. If it fails with dependency problems, as it may if
> > > your system has packages from older Red Hat releases, find
> > > and remove them, then try again. The command "rpm -qf
> > > /path/to/file" is handy for figuring out which package a
> > > particular file came from.
> > > >
> > > > Please do let me know if this procedure works for you.
> > > >
> > > > --Mark Knutsen
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com
> > > > > [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com]On Behalf Of Dan
Wittenberg
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 2:10 PM
> > > > > To: Red Hat Network Users List
> > > > > Subject: Re: [rhn-users] Upgrade 9.0 to RHEL 3.0
> > > > >
> > > > > In the archives...
> > > > >
> > > > >
https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhn-users/2004-May/msg00128.html
> > > > >
> > > > > Dan
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 13:38, Higareda, Robert wrote:
> > > > > > Does anyone have the email posted about upgrading
> > > RedHat Linux 9.0 to
> > > > > > Redhat Enterprise Linux 3.0 if so can anyone forward it
> > > to me thanks!






More information about the rhn-users mailing list