[rhn-users] up2date won't update openoffice

NORMAND Rémy r.normand at le-moteur-moderne.fr
Tue May 10 07:44:47 UTC 2005


 Hello All ...

I've got the same problem, but I tried to erase openoffice, and I'm not able to re-install openoffice.


There's two different installation possible : openoffice.org and openoffice. 
Which one may I choose ?



up2date -i openoffice
Invalid group id server-cfg

Fetching Obsoletes list for channel: rhel-x86_64-ws-3...

Fetching rpm headers...
########################################

Name                                    Version        Rel
----------------------------------------------------------
openoffice                              1.0.2          8                 i386


Testing package set / solving RPM inter-dependencies...
########################################
openoffice-1.0.2-8.i386.rpm ########################## Done.
There was a package dependency problem. The message was:
Dependencies should have already been resolved, but they are not.















-----Message d'origine-----
De : rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] De la part de James Harrison
Envoyé : jeudi 28 avril 2005 17:06
À : campbell at accelinc.com; Red Hat Network Users List
Objet : Re: [rhn-users] up2date won't update openoffice

If you find a solution, please let me know.

I have a similar problem of dependencies WS RHEL3, dual Opteron openoffice is one of them.

Thanks

--- Chuck Campbell <campbell at accelinc.com> wrote:
> I have two machines running RHEL3-U5.  Both are dual Opteron, running
> 64 bit.  Both are entitles.  One is WS and one is ES.  Both behave 
> identically with respect to the information below.
> 
> When I run up2date, it tells me there are three packages for upgrading.
> 
> [root at cm up2date]# up2date --list
> Fetching Obsoletes list for channel: rhel-x86_64-es-3...
> Fetching Obsoletes list for channel: rhel-x86_64-es-3-extras...
> Fetching rpm headers...
> ########################################
> Name                                    Version        Rel     
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> openoffice.org                          1.1.2          24.2.0.EL3       
> i386  
> openoffice.org-i18n                     1.1.2          24.2.0.EL3       
> i386  
> openoffice.org-libs                     1.1.2          24.2.0.EL3       
> i386
> 
> when I try to update these I get the following:
> 
> Testing package set / solving RPM inter-dependencies...
> ########################################
> RPM package conflict error.  The message was:
> Test install failed because of package conflicts:
> The following packages were added to your selection to satisfy dependencies:
> Name                                    Version        Release
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> GConf2                                  2.2.1          4                   
> ORBit2                                  2.6.2          1                   
> bonobo-activation                       2.2.2          1                   
> fam                                     2.6.8          15                  
> gnome-vfs2                              2.2.5          2E.1                
> libbonobo                               2.2.3          1                   
> linc                                    1.0.3          1                   
> qt                                      3.1.2          13.4                
> redhat-artwork                          0.73.2         2E                  
> startup-notification                    0.5            1                   
> libmng                                  1.0.4          3                   
> 
> file /usr/share/man/man1/bonobo-activation-server.1.gz from install of
> bonobo-activation-2.2.2-1 conflicts with file from package
> bonobo-activation-2.2.2-1
> 
> 
> If I do an rpm -qa, I see that every one of these "packages added to 
> your selection" is already installed, with an exact version and 
> release match to the above list reported by up2date.
> 
> I did an up2date -p to re-synchronize, but it made no difference.  
> What gives?
> 
> What do I do to get past this problem?
> 
> thanks,
> -chuck
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rhn-users mailing list
> rhn-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com 

_______________________________________________
rhn-users mailing list
rhn-users at redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users





More information about the rhn-users mailing list