[rhn-users] Authconfig Problem

sudhanshu chopra sid_prodigy at hotmail.com
Mon Sep 26 19:56:46 UTC 2005


hi Necati,

I tried ur solution.Sorry friend it is not working.
I want that whenever i run authconfig command,my /etc/pam.d/system-auth file 
should not change.

help me out friend.U r RHCE ,and i m write now preparing for RHCE exam.

waiting.....

Regards
Sudhanshu Chopra




>From: Necati Keles <pengunix at yahoo.com>
>Reply-To: Red Hat Network Users List <rhn-users at redhat.com>
>To: Red Hat Network Users List <rhn-users at redhat.com>
>Subject: RE:[rhn-users] Authconfig Problem
>Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 12:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
>
>Sudhanshu,
>
>If it doesn't work correctly (authconfig) , you can change something in 
>/etc/nsswitch.conf file.
>It looks like :
>
>[root at xyz ~]# more /etc/nsswitch.conf
>#
># /etc/nsswitch.conf
>#
># An example Name Service Switch config file. This file should be
># sorted with the most-used services at the beginning.
>#
># The entry '[NOTFOUND=return]' means that the search for an
># entry should stop if the search in the previous entry turned
># up nothing. Note that if the search failed due to some other reason
># (like no NIS server responding) then the search continues with the
># next entry.
>#
># Legal entries are:
>#
>#       nisplus or nis+         Use NIS+ (NIS version 3)
>#       nis or yp               Use NIS (NIS version 2), also called YP
>#       dns                     Use DNS (Domain Name Service)
>#       files                   Use the local files
>#       db                      Use the local database (.db) files
>#       compat                  Use NIS on compat mode
>#       hesiod                  Use Hesiod for user lookups
>#       [NOTFOUND=return]       Stop searching if not found so far
>#
># To use db, put the "db" in front of "files" for entries you want to be
># looked up first in the databases
>#
># Example:
>#passwd:    db files nisplus nis
>#shadow:    db files nisplus nis
>#group:     db files nisplus nis
>passwd:     files
>shadow:     files
>group:      files
>#hosts:     db files nisplus nis dns
>hosts:      files dns
># Example - obey only what nisplus tells us...
>#services:   nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
>#networks:   nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
>#protocols:  nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
>#rpc:        nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
>#ethers:     nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
>#netmasks:   nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
>bootparams: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
>ethers:     files
>netmasks:   files
>networks:   files
>protocols:  files
>rpc:        files
>services:   files
>netgroup:   files
>publickey:  nisplus
>automount:  files
>aliases:    files nisplus
>[root at xyz ~]#
>
>
>
>lynos
>===============
>RHCE , SCSA / Istanbul , Türkiye
>
>
>
>
>
>sudhanshu chopra <sid_prodigy at hotmail.com> wrote:
>Hi Frazier,
>
>It is still not working.After changing the execution bit ,it says
>"Permission denied" to root.And im not able
>to run "authconfig" command.
>What should be done.plz help me out.
>
>Regards
>Sudhanshu chopra
>
>
> >From: "Frazier, Darrell USA CRC (Contractor)"
> >
> >Reply-To: Red Hat Network Users List
> >To: "'rhn-users at redhat.com'"
> >Subject: RE:[rhn-users] Authconfig Problem
> >Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 11:11:15 -0500
> >
> >When configuring PAM. It is customary to take the execution bit off the
> >binary so that the system-auth file isn't overwritten:
> >
> >As root:
> >
> >chmod 600 /usr/sbin/authconfig
> >chmod 600 /usr/bin/authconfig
> >
> >Hope this helps.
> >
> >Darrell
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: rhn-users-request at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-request at redhat.com]
> >Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 11:00 AM
> >To: rhn-users at redhat.com
> >Subject: rhn-users Digest, Vol 19, Issue 29
> >
> >Send rhn-users mailing list submissions to
> > rhn-users at redhat.com
> >
> >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users
> >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > rhn-users-request at redhat.com
> >
> >You can reach the person managing the list at
> > rhn-users-owner at redhat.com
> >
> >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> >than "Re: Contents of rhn-users digest..."
> >
> >
> >Today's Topics:
> >
> > 1. Authconfig Problem (sudhanshu chopra)
> > 2. g++ (Craig M. Jameson)
> > 3. Re: g++ (Naoki)
> > 4. Re: g++ (Craig M. Jameson)
> >
> >
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >Message: 1
> >Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 22:49:00 +0530
> >From: "sudhanshu chopra"
> >Subject: [rhn-users] Authconfig Problem
> >To: rhn-users at redhat.com
> >Message-ID:
> >Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
> >
> >hello friends,
> >
> >i'm presently configuring pam.Whenever i run authconfig command,my
> >/etc/pam.d/sytem-auth file is regenerated.
> >What can be done so that whenever i run authconfig command my
> >/etc/pam.d/system-auth file is not changed?
> >
> >waiting for ur reply.
> >thanks you
> >
> >Regards
> >Sudhanshu Chopra
> >
> >_________________________________________________________________
> >Repay your personal loan on your own terms.
> >http://www.hsbc.co.in/script/in/common/redirect.asp?redirectto=/in/personal/
> >loans/perloan.htm
> >With HSBC's MyTerms Credit
> >
> >
> >
> >------------------------------
> >
> >Message: 2
> >Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 22:23:43 -0600
> >From: "Craig M. Jameson"
> >Subject: [rhn-users] g++
> >To: rhn-users at redhat.com
> >Message-ID: <1127708623.31028.26.camel at Prescott>
> >Content-Type: text/plain
> >
> >I am befuddled. I am an amateur administrator trying to compile my first
> >C++ program. (Actually, the compile succeeded.) I tried to compile the
> >following two programs:
> >
> >#include
> >#include
> >int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { cout << "hey"; return 0; }
> >
> >and
> >
> >#include
> >#include
> >int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {std::cout << "hey"; return 0; }
> >
> >The second compiles. The first does not. (Every presumably reliable
> >source I have seen says to write this as in the first case.) Can I rule
> >out a problem with my installation? (i.e. is this a problem with my
> >understanding of linux or C++?)
> >
> >I compile using the command
> > g++ -v filename.C
> >
> >The output for the first case contains
> >
> > #include <...> search starts here:
> > /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.3/../../../../include/c++/3.4.3
> >
> >where iostream is located, and
> >
> > error: `cout' undeclared (first use this function)
> >
> >(When I compile the second case, in runs fine.)
> >
> >
> >Craig.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >------------------------------
> >
> >Message: 3
> >Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:34:35 +0900
> >From: Naoki
> >Subject: Re: [rhn-users] g++
> >To: Red Hat Network Users List
> >Message-ID: <1127709275.3353.67.camel at dragon.sys.intra>
> >Content-Type: text/plain
> >
> >Yeah, that one bit me for a while as well. You need to add to the first
> >one : "using namespace std;" and then it'll know.
> >
> >
> >
> >On Sun, 2005-09-25 at 22:23 -0600, Craig M. Jameson wrote:
> > > I am befuddled. I am an amateur administrator trying to compile my 
>first
> > > C++ program. (Actually, the compile succeeded.) I tried to compile the
> > > following two programs:
> > >
> > > #include
> > > #include
> > > int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { cout << "hey"; return 0; }
> > >
> > > and
> > >
> > > #include
> > > #include
> > > int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {std::cout << "hey"; return 0; }
> > >
> > > The second compiles. The first does not. (Every presumably reliable
> > > source I have seen says to write this as in the first case.) Can I 
>rule
> > > out a problem with my installation? (i.e. is this a problem with my
> > > understanding of linux or C++?)
> > >
> > > I compile using the command
> > > g++ -v filename.C
> > >
> > > The output for the first case contains
> > >
> > > #include <...> search starts here:
> > > /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.3/../../../../include/c++/3.4.3
> > >
> > > where iostream is located, and
> > >
> > > error: `cout' undeclared (first use this function)
> > >
> > > (When I compile the second case, in runs fine.)
> > >
> > >
> > > Craig.
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > rhn-users mailing list
> > > rhn-users at redhat.com
> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >------------------------------
> >
> >Message: 4
> >Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 08:35:31 -0600
> >From: "Craig M. Jameson"
> >Subject: Re: [rhn-users] g++
> >To: Red Hat Network Users List
> >Message-ID: <1127745331.1092.0.camel at Prescott>
> >Content-Type: text/plain
> >
> >Sure enough. Thanks a bunch.
> >
> >Craig.
> >
> >
> >On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 13:34 +0900, Naoki wrote:
> > > Yeah, that one bit me for a while as well. You need to add to the 
>first
> > > one : "using namespace std;" and then it'll know.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, 2005-09-25 at 22:23 -0600, Craig M. Jameson wrote:
> > > > I am befuddled. I am an amateur administrator trying to compile my
> >first
> > > > C++ program. (Actually, the compile succeeded.) I tried to compile 
>the
> > > > following two programs:
> > > >
> > > > #include
> > > > #include
> > > > int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { cout << "hey"; return 0; }
> > > >
> > > > and
> > > >
> > > > #include
> > > > #include
> > > > int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {std::cout << "hey"; return 0; }
> > > >
> > > > The second compiles. The first does not. (Every presumably reliable
> > > > source I have seen says to write this as in the first case.) Can I
> >rule
> > > > out a problem with my installation? (i.e. is this a problem with my
> > > > understanding of linux or C++?)
> > > >
> > > > I compile using the command
> > > > g++ -v filename.C
> > > >
> > > > The output for the first case contains
> > > >
> > > > #include <...> search starts here:
> > > > /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.3/../../../../include/c++/3.4.3
> > > >
> > > > where iostream is located, and
> > > >
> > > > error: `cout' undeclared (first use this function)
> > > >
> > > > (When I compile the second case, in runs fine.)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Craig.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > rhn-users mailing list
> > > > rhn-users at redhat.com
> > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > rhn-users mailing list
> > > rhn-users at redhat.com
> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users
> >
> >
> >
> >------------------------------
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >rhn-users mailing list
> >rhn-users at redhat.com
> >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users
> >
> >End of rhn-users Digest, Vol 19, Issue 29
> >*****************************************
>
>
> >_______________________________________________
> >rhn-users mailing list
> >rhn-users at redhat.com
> >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Now or Never special offer for NRIs!
>http://creative.mediaturf.net/creatives/citibankrca/rca_msntagofline.htm
>Zero balance Account from Citibank!
>
>_______________________________________________
>rhn-users mailing list
>rhn-users at redhat.com
>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>http://mail.yahoo.com


>_______________________________________________
>rhn-users mailing list
>rhn-users at redhat.com
>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users

_________________________________________________________________
Amitabh fan? Here’s a chance to chat with the Big B himself. 
http://server1.msn.co.in/sp05/DJbk/index.asp Click here now!




More information about the rhn-users mailing list