[rhn-users] vsftpd performance very slow
dbossung at southeast.edu
dbossung at southeast.edu
Fri Aug 4 13:33:05 UTC 2006
David,
I think I am experiencing some of those 'know issues' you speak of. After
emailing Daryl, the nic has oscelleted between FD and HD on a very random
basis. Just all of a sudden, for no reason, the duplex will change.
I have already taken your advice and switched nics. All is well with the
new Intel.
Damn Micron for using a motherboard with this chipset, been nothing but
trouble since we got the clientpros. :(
Thanks for your input.
Don
"David A. Ranch"
<dranch at trinnet.n
et> To
Sent by: Red Hat Network Users List
rhn-users-bounces <rhn-users at redhat.com>
@redhat.com cc
Subject
08/04/2006 01:09 Re: [rhn-users] vsftpd performance
AM very slow
Please respond to
Red Hat Network
Users List
<rhn-users at redhat
.com>
It's worth noting that there are known issues with early generation
Yukon MAC and PHY chips including auto-negotiation. Check with your NIC
vendor for details or try a different NIC (Intel, etc.)
--David
dbossung at southeast.edu wrote:
> Right on the money Daryl, thanks. Now getting over 10Mb/s. Much more fun
> moving ISOs around now :)
>
> FWIW I always set the switch port 100FD and then force the host to same.
> For some reason when I set this host to 100 FD with ethtool, I would
loose
> connectivity and when I set it back to HD I got connectivity. (Remember,
> the switch port is manually set to 100 FD)
>
> I set the switch port to auto and set the nic to auto, I get 100FD. Go
> figure.
>
> The switch is a Cisco Catalyst 3550 and the nic is a built in Marvel
Yukon.
>
> Uh, oh, That just jogged my memory that there were some problems with the
> Yukon driver under Fedora, maybe I am running into the same thing here.
> Will check and see.
>
> Thanks for the pointer
>
>
>
> Daryl Field
> <djf at pipex.net>
> Sent by:
To
> rhn-users-bounces Red Hat Network Users List
> @redhat.com <rhn-users at redhat.com>
>
cc
>
> 08/02/2006 05:38
Subject
> AM Re: [rhn-users] vsftpd performance
> very slow
>
> Please respond to
> Red Hat Network
> Users List
> <rhn-users at redhat
> .com>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Try copying the file using another method - scp/nfs/samba - you can then
> tell whether the network is the issue, which is most likely.
> Check IPtables isn't using 'Limit' to throttle connections - unlikely
> but I have seen this before.
>
> I'd check your duplex settings up front through.
>
> Daryl
>
> dbossung at southeast.edu wrote:
>> I have just installed RHES 4.3 and enabled/started vsftpd.
>>
>> Both the client and the server are on the same private subnet. 100Mb/s
>>
>> When I use FileZilla on a windows box to connect (using the quick
connect
>> option) and send a file (from 22M to 560M in size) the throughput is
>> extremly slow. (<100KB/s). I see similar results using WSFTP on the same
>> windows host.
>>
>> I found a kb article about using 'noreservation' in fstab, tried that
but
>> was no help.
>>
>> Any other ideas about what to look at. I don't even know how to start
> with
>> this.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Don
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rhn-users mailing list
>> rhn-users at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rhn-users mailing list
> rhn-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rhn-users mailing list
> rhn-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users
_______________________________________________
rhn-users mailing list
rhn-users at redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users
More information about the rhn-users
mailing list