[rhn-users] Most Critical Systems list on RHN

[Greg Forte]

Ah!  So they mean "critical" as in nuclear meltdown, not as in most 
important to your organization.  ;-)

-g

Máirín Duffy wrote:
> Hi John,
> 
> inode0 wrote:
>> Having watched this new list over the past few weeks I am completely
>> at a loss to guess by what logic Red Hat determines the "Most
>> Critical" systems. Can anyone shed any light on this for me?
> 
> The way it was designed to work:
> 
> (1) Systems with the highest # of updates available (with weight applied 
> to security, bugfix, and enhancement errata in that order, 
> greatest-to-least) are displayed towards the top of the list.
> 
> (2) (Satellite-only) Systems with the highest # of critical / warning 
> probes (weight applied in that status order, greatest-to-least.) are 
> displayed towards the top. I believe if a system has both pending 
> updates AND monitoring probes needing attention, it will float to the 
> top of the list above systems with only pending updates OR monitoring 
> probes needing attention.
> 
> Make sense? Does this fit with what you've observed?
> 
> ~m
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rhn-users mailing list
> rhn-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users
>