[rhn-users] Most Critical Systems list on RHN

[inode0]

On 8/9/06, Máirín Duffy <duffy at redhat.com> wrote:
> inode0 wrote:
> > Yes I think that makes sense but I don't think it is what I'm
> > observing at all. Currently among the top 5 I see four systems with 2
> > outstanding updates and one system with a single outstanding update.
> > Needless to say, I have hundreds of systems in far worse shape on
> > paper.
>
> Okay; I hadn't observed this is my own accounts. This definitely sounds
> like a bug, though, so I've filed one:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201950

The thing is that it has been fairly useful so far doing whatever it
has been doing and I'm afraid it would not be useful if it told me
there were 5 systems with 300+ outstanding errata. Those systems
likely don't exist in reality, or are being held a rev back for some
reason, etc. This is why I think the ability to help focus the
criteria at the organization level would be really cool. I'd like to
ignore systems with X or more outstanding errata, systems that haven't
checked in for more than Y days, etc. Just food for thought.

Thanks,
John