[rhn-users] LVM

Mon Jun 26 22:40:16 UTC 2006

As I said, I am using hardware raid and a perc/cerc controller. I can
reconstruct the drive from RAID 1 to RAID 0 with no problem. All the
data is still there and stuff. Now the computer sees the two disk as one
big disk but the partitions are still on only half of the big disk. I
really hate this LVM stuff. I guess it's because I don't know it...

Sead

On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 18:29:18 -0400
 "Lamon, Frank III" <Frank_LaMon at csx.com> wrote:
> Lots of red flags all over the place here - converting a mirrored set
to a striped set on the fly sort of (it sounds like you haven't reloaded
the OS)? 
> 
> But let's see what you have now. Can you give us the output of the
following commands?
> 
> fdisk -l
> pvscan
> pvdisplay
> lvdisplay
> vgdisplay
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com
> [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com]On Behalf Of Sead Dzelil (Student)
> Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 6:16 PM
> To: gforte at udel.edu; Red Hat Network Users List
> Subject: Re: [rhn-users] LVM
> 
> 
> Thank you very much for taking the time to help me. I only have two 73GB
> hard drives right now and I need 100+GB of storage. I am not concerned
> about redundancy because the server is used for computations, not for
> important storage. Please help me out if you know your LVM. The computer
> sees the whole 146GB but the volume group is on only 73GB. What can I
> too to resize it and make the OS see the whole disk. Please help.
> 
> Thank You
> 
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 04:58:19 -0400
>  Greg Forte <gforte at leopard.us.udel.edu> wrote:
> > Wow, where to start ...
> > 
> > First of all, Travers: he's already got hardware raid, he said as
> much: "... went into the RAID BIOS ...".  It's built-in to the 6800
series.
> > 
> > Sead: your foremost problem is that you don't have enough disk space
> for any kind of meaningful redundancy if you need 100+ GB.  RAID0 isn't
> really RAID at all (unless you replace "redundant" with "risky") - RAID0
> stripes the data across N of N disks with no parity data, which means if
> one disk fails the whole system is gone.  Instantly.  It's basically
> JBOD with a performance boost due to multiplexing reads and writes.  To
> put it bluntly, no one in their right mind runs the OS off of a RAID0
> volume.
> > 
> > Beyond that, I'm surprised (impressed?) that the OS even still boots -
> after the conversion any data on the disks should be scrap.  Maybe the
> newer Dell RAID controllers are able to convert non-destructively.  I'll
> assume that's true, in which case the reason the OS doesn't see the
> difference is because you still need to change both the partition size
> (in this case, the logical volume extent size) and the filesystem
> itself.  In which case you COULD theoretically use lvextend to enlarge
> the LVM volume, and then resize2fs to grow the filesystem (assuming it's
> ext2/3, which it almost definitely is).  BUT, there's still the problem
> I mentioned above.
> > 
> > The first thing you need to do is fix the physical disk problem.
> Depending on how the machine is configured, this may be easy or hard.
> > A 6800 has 10 drive slots on the main storage backplane (the bays on
> the right), and if the two existing drives are on that backplane then it
> _should_ be a simple matter of buying a third 73GB disk, installing it,
> going into the RAID BIOS and converting again to RAID5 (assuming it can
> also do that conversion without trashing the disks - I'm guessing it can
> if it did RAID1 to RAID0), and then doing lvextend and resize2fs as
> described above (I know, you want more detail, but you need the disk
> first ;-)
> > 
> > BUT ... I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess that the machine was
> configured with the 1x2 secondary backplane in the peripheral bay area
> on the left.  If that's the case, then you're not going to be able to
> add a third disk in that area, and I don't think you can configure a
> raid with disk members on different backplanes - and even if you can,
> I'd guess the 10 bays in the main storage are all filled, or it wouldn't
> be configured with the extra backplane to begin with.  You'd have to
> check with Dell tech support about that, to be sure.  But assuming all
> of my guesses are right, the only option left is going to be to buy two
> larger disks and configure them for RAID1, just like the two 73's you've
> got now.  The other bad news in that situation is that you're probably
> going to have to reinstall from scratch - you could probably manage to
> image from the existing volume to the new one, but it's also almost
> surely going to end up being more effort (if you've never done that sort
> of thing
> > before) than simply re-installing.
> > 
> > Good luck!  Once you do get the disk situation worked out, let us know
> and I (or someone else) can help you through the lvextend+resize2fs, if
> necessary.  I suspect you won't end up needing that, though.
> > 
> > -g
> > 
> > Travers Hogan wrote:
> > > It looks as if you have software raid 1. You cannot change this-you
> must rebuild your system. I would also suggest getting a hardware raid
> controller.
> > > rgds
> > > Trav
> > > 
> > > ________________________________
> > > 
> > > From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com on behalf of Sead Dzelil (Student)
> > > Sent: Sun 25/06/2006 03:10
> > > To: rhn-users at redhat.com
> > > Subject: [rhn-users] LVM
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I am a system administrator with no experience with lvm. I have used
> > > fdisk in the past and I was very comfortable with that. I have a very
> > > important question. I have a Dell PowerEdge 6800 server that came with
> > > two 73GB hard drives in a RAID 1 configuration. The order was placed
> > > wrongly, because we need 100+ GB of storage. I went into the RAID BIOS
> > > and changed it from RAID 1 to RAID 0. Now the RAID BIOS display the
> > > logical volume with the full 146GB of storage.
> > > 
> > > The problem is that in the OS(RedHat Enterprise) nothing has changed.
> > > It still only sees the 73GB of storage. What can I do to get the
> > > system to see the whole 146GB? I need as detail info as possible
> > > because I have never used lvm before. Thank You in advance.
> > > 
> > > Sead
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > rhn-users mailing list
> > > rhn-users at redhat.com
> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > rhn-users mailing list
> > > rhn-users at redhat.com
> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > rhn-users mailing list
> > rhn-users at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rhn-users mailing list
> rhn-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users
> 
> -----------------------------------------
> This email transmission and any accompanying attachments may
> contain CSX privileged and confidential information intended only
> for the use of the intended addressee.  Any dissemination,
> distribution, copying or action taken in reliance on the contents
> of this email by anyone other than the intended recipient is
> strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error
> please immediately delete it and  notify sender at the above CSX
> email address.  Sender and CSX accept no liability for any damage
> caused directly or indirectly by receipt of this email.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rhn-users mailing list
> rhn-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users