From abhijeetat at yahoo.com Thu Feb 1 12:25:07 2007 From: abhijeetat at yahoo.com (Abhi) Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 04:25:07 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rhn-users] qmail problem Message-ID: <753668.81496.qm@web55202.mail.re4.yahoo.com> hi ive just installed qmail on RHEL4.Its sending/reciving mail but i couldnt see folders.Insted i m getting followin error( in red).PLz tell me sol. for this. ERROR : Could not complete request. Query: CREATE "Sent" Reason Given: Invalid mailbox name Thank you Yours Truly, Abhi --------------------------------- It's here! Your new message! Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From duffy at redhat.com Thu Feb 1 15:52:46 2007 From: duffy at redhat.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=E1ir=EDn_Duffy?=) Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 10:52:46 -0500 Subject: [rhn-users] qmail problem In-Reply-To: <753668.81496.qm@web55202.mail.re4.yahoo.com> References: <753668.81496.qm@web55202.mail.re4.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <45C20CCE.5000201@redhat.com> Hi Abhi, Abhi wrote: > hi > ive just installed qmail on RHEL4.Its sending/reciving mail but i > couldnt see folders.Insted i m getting followin error( in red).PLz tell > me sol. for this. > > > *ERROR : Could not complete request. > Query: CREATE "Sent" > Reason Given: Invalid mailbox name* This is a mailing list for discussions about using Red Hat Network to manage and apply updates to Red Hat Enterprise Linux, including discussion about particular Red Hat Enterprise Linux updates. This list is not intended for discussion about topics specific to Red Hat Enterprise Linux that do not involve Red Hat Network. For discussion of such topics, you may want to try: [1] RHEL 4 Discussion - https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/nahant-list [2] RHEL 3 Discussion - https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list [3] Red Hat System Administrators' list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list Thanks, ~m From smal at ccmb.res.in Fri Feb 2 03:53:58 2007 From: smal at ccmb.res.in (Mahalingam Subramaniam) Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 09:23:58 +0530 (IST) Subject: [rhn-users] qmail problem In-Reply-To: <45C20CCE.5000201@redhat.com> Message-ID: <28652079.1170388438374.JavaMail.root@mailserver> the links directed by you were not found to be active. cud u plz. direct us to the relevant address for discussing about the issues pertaining to RHEL3 & RHEL4?. smal -- Original Message -- From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=E1ir=EDn_Duffy?= To: "Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)" Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 10:52:46 -0500 Subject: Re: [rhn-users] qmail problem Hi Abhi, Abhi wrote: > hi > ive just installed qmail on RHEL4.Its sending/reciving mail but i > couldnt see folders.Insted i m getting followin error( in red).PLz tell > me sol. for this. > > > *ERROR : Could not complete request. > Query: CREATE "Sent" > Reason Given: Invalid mailbox name* This is a mailing list for discussions about using Red Hat Network to manage and apply updates to Red Hat Enterprise Linux, including discussion about particular Red Hat Enterprise Linux updates. This list is not intended for discussion about topics specific to Red Hat Enterprise Linux that do not involve Red Hat Network. For discussion of such topics, you may want to try: [1] RHEL 4 Discussion - https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/nahant-list [2] RHEL 3 Discussion - https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list [3] Red Hat System Administrators' list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list Thanks, ~m _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From michael.mansour at hp.com Fri Feb 2 04:05:48 2007 From: michael.mansour at hp.com (Mansour, Michael) Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 12:05:48 +0800 Subject: [rhn-users] qmail problem In-Reply-To: <28652079.1170388438374.JavaMail.root@mailserver> References: <45C20CCE.5000201@redhat.com> <28652079.1170388438374.JavaMail.root@mailserver> Message-ID: <58727644D357E1429F7095BD0A29709404516522@sgpexc05.asiapacific.cpqcorp.net> Hi, I went to all the links he supplied and they all worked fine. Regards, Michael. ________________________________ From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Mahalingam Subramaniam Sent: Friday, 2 February 2007 2:54 PM To: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) Subject: Re: Re: [rhn-users] qmail problem the links directed by you were not found to be active. cud u plz. direct us to the relevant address for discussing about the issues pertaining to RHEL3 & RHEL4?. smal -- Original Message -- From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=E1ir=EDn_Duffy?= To: "Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)" Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 10:52:46 -0500 Subject: Re: [rhn-users] qmail problem Hi Abhi, Abhi wrote: > hi > ive just installed qmail on RHEL4.Its sending/reciving mail but i > couldnt see folders.Insted i m getting followin error( in red).PLz tell > me sol. for this. > > > *ERROR : Could not complete request. > Query: CREATE "Sent" > Reason Given: Invalid mailbox name* This is a mailing list for discussions about using Red Hat Network to manage and apply updates to Red Hat Enterprise Linux, including discussion about particular Red Hat Enterprise Linux updates. This list is not intended for discussion about topics specific to Red Hat Enterprise Linux that do not involve Red Hat Network. For discussion of such topics, you may want to try: [1] RHEL 4 Discussion - https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/nahant-list [2] RHEL 3 Discussion - https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list [3] Red Hat System Administrators' list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list Thanks, ~m _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From robert at pottsdata.com Fri Feb 2 06:14:23 2007 From: robert at pottsdata.com (Robert Potts) Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 23:14:23 -0700 Subject: [rhn-users] qmail problem In-Reply-To: <58727644D357E1429F7095BD0A29709404516522@sgpexc05.asiapacific.cpqcorp.net> References: <45C20CCE.5000201@redhat.com> <28652079.1170388438374.JavaMail.root@mailserver> <58727644D357E1429F7095BD0A29709404516522@sgpexc05.asiapacific.cpqcorp.net> Message-ID: <45C2D6BF.1080307@pottsdata.com> Hola Abhi, Googled: qmail "Invalid mailbox name" came up with this discussion: http://forum.qmailrocks.org/showthread.php?t=3858 which has this possible solution: >Thanks to braverock and stekkel on IRC for pointing out that the RPM may have been installed so I was looking at >the wrong config file... >I nuked the RPM and put the proper files in /usr/share/squirrelmail though I'm still not sure what is telling apache to >redirect /webmail there rather than /var/www/html/webmail .. it isn't in /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf ... oh well >--- SOLVED (again) --- >Okay so there is a file /etc/httpd/conf.d/squirrelmail.conf that got deleted when I nuked the RPM, it contains the Alias >/webmail /usr/share/squirrelmail .. if I rebooted or reloaded apache I'd have lost my webmail alias, so I'm moving the >files back and reloading apache hope this helps, and I suggest using google to search in a similar manner in the future. I've been kindly taught that the traffic on this list really needs to be constrained to topics that the list is for and am fully in agreement. warm regards, Robert Mansour, Michael wrote: > Hi, > > I went to all the links he supplied and they all worked fine. > > Regards, > > Michael. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com > [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] *On Behalf Of *Mahalingam > Subramaniam > *Sent:* Friday, 2 February 2007 2:54 PM > *To:* Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) > *Subject:* Re: Re: [rhn-users] qmail problem > > the links directed by you were not found to be active. cud u > plz. direct us to the relevant address for discussing about the issues > pertaining to RHEL3 & RHEL4?. > > smal > > > */-- Original Message --/* > From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=E1ir=EDn_Duffy?= > To: "Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)" > > Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 10:52:46 -0500 > Subject: Re: [rhn-users] qmail problem > > Hi Abhi, > > Abhi wrote: > > hi > > ive just installed qmail on RHEL4.Its sending/reciving mail but i > > couldnt see folders.Insted i m getting followin error( in red).PLz tell > > me sol. for this. > > > > > > *ERROR : Could not complete request. > > Query: CREATE "Sent" > > Reason Given: Invalid mailbox name* > > This is a mailing list for discussions about using Red Hat Network to > manage and apply updates to Red Hat Enterprise Linux, including > discussion about particular Red Hat Enterprise Linux updates. > > This list is not intended for discussion about topics specific to Red > Hat Enterprise Linux that do not involve Red Hat Network. For discussion > of such topics, you may want to try: > > [1] RHEL 4 Discussion - > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/nahant-list > [2] RHEL 3 Discussion - > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list > [3] Red Hat System Administrators' list: > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list > > Thanks, > ~m > > _______________________________________________ > rhn-users mailing list > rhn-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > rhn-users mailing list > rhn-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users From duffy at redhat.com Fri Feb 2 18:30:43 2007 From: duffy at redhat.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=E1ir=EDn_Duffy?=) Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 13:30:43 -0500 Subject: [rhn-users] qmail problem In-Reply-To: <28652079.1170388438374.JavaMail.root@mailserver> References: <28652079.1170388438374.JavaMail.root@mailserver> Message-ID: <45C38353.6080101@redhat.com> Mahalingam Subramaniam wrote: > the links directed by you were not found to be active. cud u plz. direct > us to the relevant address for discussing about the issues pertaining to > RHEL3 & RHEL4?. https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/nahant-list > [2] RHEL 3 Discussion - https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list > [3] Red Hat System Administrators' list: > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list I double-checked each of these links and they are working. ~m From duffy at redhat.com Tue Feb 6 20:39:34 2007 From: duffy at redhat.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=E1ir=EDn_Duffy?=) Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 15:39:34 -0500 Subject: [rhn-users] Recent and Upcoming RHN Account Policy Changes Message-ID: <45C8E786.3090907@redhat.com> (this mail also went out to the rhn-satellite-users list) Hi folks, John and Dave were correct in their observations about the recent RHN account policy changes [1] - we should announce these changes ahead of time to give customers both a chance to give us some feedback and to absorb these changes into their process. I apologize that this was not the case. The user account changes are part of a much larger upcoming set of improvements in our account system across all customer-facing services, not just RHN. These were initiated in part due to customer feedback about how our account systems work. The single email address per account policy change in particular is part of an improvement to support single sign on accounts; right now you may have multiple accounts to access various Red Hat applications such as RHN, the Red Hat Store, customer service & support, Issue Tracker, etc. We are working to consolidate these systems under a single account system so you'll only need one account to access these different applications. Another upcoming improvement related to this account policy change is a multi-organizational account management. Multi-organizational management will allow one Red Hat account to have 'sub-accounts.' So, for example, if you've 100 purchased RHEL AS subscriptions for your servers and 100 RHEL WS subscriptions for your workstations, you'll want to make sure that folks who should be running RHEL WS do not have access to RHEL AS and cannot access subscriptions from your server group. With these upcoming changes, you'll be able to split your account into different 'organizations', one that only has access to a particular set of RHEL WS subscriptions. Then you can create accounts in the WS organization for those users who you only want to have access to those WS subscriptions. Basically, this new account system will let you have better control over what subscriptions and systems users in your organization can access in RHN. If you are an existing customer with multiple accounts associated with a single email address, you will be contacted by Red Hat Customer Service in the coming months. Our customer service folks will help you to consolidate your accounts and help you set them up in a way that will work with your organization's processes and policies, so that instead of needing multiple disparate accounts to manage your software subscriptions, you'll have one account with subaccounts under it that have particular subscriptions assigned to them. One thing to note is that all of these account changes only apply to hosted Red Hat services. So if you are a Satellite customer, these account changes are not related to the Satellite account system. They will only apply to your rhn.redhat.com account. Specifically, the multi-organizational management capabilities, single-sign on, and account policy changes I mentioned only apply to redhat.com accounts and do not apply to Satellite. I apologize again that the recent account policy change came unannounced. I hope that as more pieces of the larger improvements roll out in the upcoming months, their benefits will become more clear. I also anticipate that they will improve your experience with Red Hat Network as well as other Red Hat services. If the new email address policy disrupts your organization's ability to work with Red Hat Network (or any other Red Hat service) I encourage you to contact customer service [2] to see if some kind of temporary solution for your situation can be worked out. Thanks for bringing this issue up and for your patience as we grow and improve our services. Thanks, ~m [1] http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhn-users/2007-January/msg00018.html [2] https://www.redhat.com/about/contact/dir/#custservice or https://www.redhat.com/apps/support/ From bill at magicdigits.com Tue Feb 6 20:39:05 2007 From: bill at magicdigits.com (Bill Watson) Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 12:39:05 -0800 Subject: [rhn-users] RedHat sendmail 8.13.1 In-Reply-To: <45B7A3C8.9090500@riverscomputers.com> Message-ID: <00cd01c74a2e$d82bd210$09000032@bill> Are there a whole bunch of reasons that RedHat doesn't have 8.13.8, or at least 8.13.5 as the available update for sendmail? There appears, based on google searches, to be a recurring problem where email to AOL accounts does not go through in the pre 8.13.5 releases of sendmail. AFAIK, 8.13.1 is RedHat's latest. If there are other solutions to this symptom, I am all ears. sendmail.org only has source RPM's and I'd rather have something that is RedHat specific if at all possible. FYI sysadmins, check /var/spool/mqueue for a pile of emails that are deferred, and have a good chance of being destined for AOL accounts. Thanks, Bill Watson bill at magicdigits.com From Steven.Jones at vuw.ac.nz Tue Feb 6 20:44:31 2007 From: Steven.Jones at vuw.ac.nz (Steven Jones) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 09:44:31 +1300 Subject: [rhn-users] RedHat sendmail 8.13.1 Message-ID: <75CF552F30ECFA439D9B3008906F2A37012836D0@STAWINCOMAILCL1.staff.vuw.ac.nz> You could look at rpmfind.net and locate a newer rhas or fedora rpm and test..... Otherwise accelerate the issue via a problem record....if RH do not respond give your account rep a severe bashing. regards Steven Jones Senior Linux/Unix/San System Administrator APG -Technology Integration Team Victoria University of Wellington Phone: +64 4 463 6272 Mobile: +64 27 563 6272 -----Original Message----- From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Bill Watson Sent: Wednesday, 7 February 2007 9:39 a.m. To: 'Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)' Subject: [rhn-users] RedHat sendmail 8.13.1 Are there a whole bunch of reasons that RedHat doesn't have 8.13.8, or at least 8.13.5 as the available update for sendmail? There appears, based on google searches, to be a recurring problem where email to AOL accounts does not go through in the pre 8.13.5 releases of sendmail. AFAIK, 8.13.1 is RedHat's latest. If there are other solutions to this symptom, I am all ears. sendmail.org only has source RPM's and I'd rather have something that is RedHat specific if at all possible. FYI sysadmins, check /var/spool/mqueue for a pile of emails that are deferred, and have a good chance of being destined for AOL accounts. Thanks, Bill Watson bill at magicdigits.com _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users From inode0 at gmail.com Tue Feb 6 21:13:27 2007 From: inode0 at gmail.com (inode0) Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 15:13:27 -0600 Subject: [rhn-users] Fwd: [rhn-satellite-users] Recent and Upcoming RHN Account Policy Changes In-Reply-To: References: <45C8D60C.7070707@redhat.com> Message-ID: ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: inode0 Date: Feb 6, 2007 2:25 PM Subject: Re: [rhn-satellite-users] Recent and Upcoming RHN Account Policy Changes To: rhn-users-list at redhat.com, rhn-satellite-users at redhat.com On 2/6/07, M?ir?n Duffy wrote: > Hi folks, > > John and Dave were correct in their observations about the recent RHN > account policy changes [1] - we should announce these changes ahead of > time to give customers both a chance to give us some feedback and to > absorb these changes into their process. I apologize that this was not > the case. We do appreciate any efforts you make toward including more of us in the feedback loop prior to rolling out policy changes of this nature in the future. > The user account changes are part of a much larger upcoming set of > improvements in our account system across all customer-facing services, > not just RHN. These were initiated in part due to customer feedback > about how our account systems work. > > The single email address per account policy change in particular is part > of an improvement to support single sign on accounts; right now you may > have multiple accounts to access various Red Hat applications such as > RHN, the Red Hat Store, customer service & support, Issue Tracker, etc. > We are working to consolidate these systems under a single account > system so you'll only need one account to access these different > applications. While this isn't a real big selling point to me personally, having some reason for the policy change helps me understand why some extra work will now be required on my end. I don't need to wonder why in the world are they making me do extra stuff now. If in the future things like this get announced prior to rolling them out I think my feathers wouldn't get ruffled so often. > Another upcoming improvement related to this account policy change is a > multi-organizational account management. Multi-organizational management > will allow one Red Hat account to have 'sub-accounts.' So, for example, > if you've 100 purchased RHEL AS subscriptions for your servers and 100 > RHEL WS subscriptions for your workstations, you'll want to make sure > that folks who should be running RHEL WS do not have access to RHEL AS > and cannot access subscriptions from your server group. With these > upcoming changes, you'll be able to split your account into different > 'organizations', one that only has access to a particular set of RHEL WS > subscriptions. Then you can create accounts in the WS organization for > those users who you only want to have access to those WS subscriptions. > Basically, this new account system will let you have better control over > what subscriptions and systems users in your organization can access in RHN. This has the potential to be a huge benefit to our organization. But the devil is always in the details and now that the door is cracked open a tiny bit here are a couple of questions to get the ball rolling. Will there be administrative roles associated with a sub-account? Can the organization admin assign sub-account admin privs to another account enabling that account to control the goings on in the sub-account (create users/keys/groups)? Thanks, John From bill at magicdigits.com Tue Feb 6 21:48:51 2007 From: bill at magicdigits.com (Bill Watson) Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 13:48:51 -0800 Subject: [rhn-users] RedHat sendmail 8.13.1 In-Reply-To: <75CF552F30ECFA439D9B3008906F2A37012836D0@STAWINCOMAILCL1.staff.vuw.ac.nz> Message-ID: <00dc01c74a38$972273f0$09000032@bill> Goody! Now I get my favorite thing in all of life.... An endless loop of dependencies.... Is there a tool/trick that will handle going onto wherever and resolving dependencies without me chasing them all day? Thanks in advance, Bill Watson bill at magicdigits.com [root at hh installers]# rpm -i sendmail-8.13.7-2.fc4.2.i386.rpm warning: sendmail-8.13.7-2.fc4.2.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 4f2a6 fd2 error: Failed dependencies: libcrypto.so.5 is needed by sendmail-8.13.7-2.fc4.2.i386 libssl.so.5 is needed by sendmail-8.13.7-2.fc4.2.i386 [root at hh installers]# -----Original Message----- From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Steven Jones Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 12:45 PM To: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) Subject: RE: [rhn-users] RedHat sendmail 8.13.1 You could look at rpmfind.net and locate a newer rhas or fedora rpm and test..... Otherwise accelerate the issue via a problem record....if RH do not respond give your account rep a severe bashing. regards Steven Jones Senior Linux/Unix/San System Administrator APG -Technology Integration Team Victoria University of Wellington Phone: +64 4 463 6272 Mobile: +64 27 563 6272 -----Original Message----- From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Bill Watson Sent: Wednesday, 7 February 2007 9:39 a.m. To: 'Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)' Subject: [rhn-users] RedHat sendmail 8.13.1 Are there a whole bunch of reasons that RedHat doesn't have 8.13.8, or at least 8.13.5 as the available update for sendmail? There appears, based on google searches, to be a recurring problem where email to AOL accounts does not go through in the pre 8.13.5 releases of sendmail. AFAIK, 8.13.1 is RedHat's latest. If there are other solutions to this symptom, I am all ears. sendmail.org only has source RPM's and I'd rather have something that is RedHat specific if at all possible. FYI sysadmins, check /var/spool/mqueue for a pile of emails that are deferred, and have a good chance of being destined for AOL accounts. Thanks, Bill Watson bill at magicdigits.com _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users From michael.mansour at hp.com Tue Feb 6 22:08:22 2007 From: michael.mansour at hp.com (Mansour, Michael) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 06:08:22 +0800 Subject: [rhn-users] RedHat sendmail 8.13.1 In-Reply-To: <00dc01c74a38$972273f0$09000032@bill> References: <75CF552F30ECFA439D9B3008906F2A37012836D0@STAWINCOMAILCL1.staff.vuw.ac.nz> <00dc01c74a38$972273f0$09000032@bill> Message-ID: <58727644D357E1429F7095BD0A297094045F8385@sgpexc05.asiapacific.cpqcorp.net> Hi Bill, Please refer this problem to a more appropriate mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/nahant-list [2] RHEL 3 Discussion - https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list [3] Red Hat System Administrators' list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list Thanks. Michael. -----Original Message----- From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Bill Watson Sent: Wednesday, 7 February 2007 8:49 AM To: 'Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)' Subject: RE: [rhn-users] RedHat sendmail 8.13.1 Goody! Now I get my favorite thing in all of life.... An endless loop of dependencies.... Is there a tool/trick that will handle going onto wherever and resolving dependencies without me chasing them all day? Thanks in advance, Bill Watson bill at magicdigits.com [root at hh installers]# rpm -i sendmail-8.13.7-2.fc4.2.i386.rpm warning: sendmail-8.13.7-2.fc4.2.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 4f2a6 fd2 error: Failed dependencies: libcrypto.so.5 is needed by sendmail-8.13.7-2.fc4.2.i386 libssl.so.5 is needed by sendmail-8.13.7-2.fc4.2.i386 [root at hh installers]# -----Original Message----- From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Steven Jones Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 12:45 PM To: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) Subject: RE: [rhn-users] RedHat sendmail 8.13.1 You could look at rpmfind.net and locate a newer rhas or fedora rpm and test..... Otherwise accelerate the issue via a problem record....if RH do not respond give your account rep a severe bashing. regards Steven Jones Senior Linux/Unix/San System Administrator APG -Technology Integration Team Victoria University of Wellington Phone: +64 4 463 6272 Mobile: +64 27 563 6272 -----Original Message----- From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Bill Watson Sent: Wednesday, 7 February 2007 9:39 a.m. To: 'Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)' Subject: [rhn-users] RedHat sendmail 8.13.1 Are there a whole bunch of reasons that RedHat doesn't have 8.13.8, or at least 8.13.5 as the available update for sendmail? There appears, based on google searches, to be a recurring problem where email to AOL accounts does not go through in the pre 8.13.5 releases of sendmail. AFAIK, 8.13.1 is RedHat's latest. If there are other solutions to this symptom, I am all ears. sendmail.org only has source RPM's and I'd rather have something that is RedHat specific if at all possible. FYI sysadmins, check /var/spool/mqueue for a pile of emails that are deferred, and have a good chance of being destined for AOL accounts. Thanks, Bill Watson bill at magicdigits.com _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users From bill at magicdigits.com Tue Feb 6 22:26:35 2007 From: bill at magicdigits.com (Bill Watson) Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 14:26:35 -0800 Subject: [rhn-users] RedHat sendmail 8.13.1 In-Reply-To: <58727644D357E1429F7095BD0A297094045F8385@sgpexc05.asiapacific.cpqcorp.net> Message-ID: <00e901c74a3d$dcec1b70$09000032@bill> OK, I'll bite, exactly how is this up2date list not the proper one for getting the RHN up2date folks alerted and possibly propose solutions to the fact that up2date does not provide a more recent version of software that has a possibility of working? It appears that sendmail-8.13.1 was created July 30, 2004. Is this mailing list ONLY for legacy versions of software that up2date offers? I *have* read the countless emails that you have sent chasing folks off this list. Please clarify *how* this email is not appropriate to you for this list. Thank you, Bill Watson bill at magicdigits.com -----Original Message----- From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Mansour, Michael Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 2:08 PM To: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) Subject: RE: [rhn-users] RedHat sendmail 8.13.1 Hi Bill, Please refer this problem to a more appropriate mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/nahant-list [2] RHEL 3 Discussion - https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list [3] Red Hat System Administrators' list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list Thanks. Michael. -----Original Message----- From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Bill Watson Sent: Wednesday, 7 February 2007 8:49 AM To: 'Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)' Subject: RE: [rhn-users] RedHat sendmail 8.13.1 Goody! Now I get my favorite thing in all of life.... An endless loop of dependencies.... Is there a tool/trick that will handle going onto wherever and resolving dependencies without me chasing them all day? Thanks in advance, Bill Watson bill at magicdigits.com [root at hh installers]# rpm -i sendmail-8.13.7-2.fc4.2.i386.rpm warning: sendmail-8.13.7-2.fc4.2.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 4f2a6 fd2 error: Failed dependencies: libcrypto.so.5 is needed by sendmail-8.13.7-2.fc4.2.i386 libssl.so.5 is needed by sendmail-8.13.7-2.fc4.2.i386 [root at hh installers]# -----Original Message----- From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Steven Jones Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 12:45 PM To: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) Subject: RE: [rhn-users] RedHat sendmail 8.13.1 You could look at rpmfind.net and locate a newer rhas or fedora rpm and test..... Otherwise accelerate the issue via a problem record....if RH do not respond give your account rep a severe bashing. regards Steven Jones Senior Linux/Unix/San System Administrator APG -Technology Integration Team Victoria University of Wellington Phone: +64 4 463 6272 Mobile: +64 27 563 6272 -----Original Message----- From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Bill Watson Sent: Wednesday, 7 February 2007 9:39 a.m. To: 'Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)' Subject: [rhn-users] RedHat sendmail 8.13.1 Are there a whole bunch of reasons that RedHat doesn't have 8.13.8, or at least 8.13.5 as the available update for sendmail? There appears, based on google searches, to be a recurring problem where email to AOL accounts does not go through in the pre 8.13.5 releases of sendmail. AFAIK, 8.13.1 is RedHat's latest. If there are other solutions to this symptom, I am all ears. sendmail.org only has source RPM's and I'd rather have something that is RedHat specific if at all possible. FYI sysadmins, check /var/spool/mqueue for a pile of emails that are deferred, and have a good chance of being destined for AOL accounts. Thanks, Bill Watson bill at magicdigits.com _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users From michael.mansour at hp.com Tue Feb 6 22:43:18 2007 From: michael.mansour at hp.com (Mansour, Michael) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 06:43:18 +0800 Subject: [rhn-users] RedHat sendmail 8.13.1 In-Reply-To: <00e901c74a3d$dcec1b70$09000032@bill> References: <58727644D357E1429F7095BD0A297094045F8385@sgpexc05.asiapacific.cpqcorp.net> <00e901c74a3d$dcec1b70$09000032@bill> Message-ID: <58727644D357E1429F7095BD0A297094045F8389@sgpexc05.asiapacific.cpqcorp.net> Hi Bill, You're attempting to install software (not through up2date) which is unsupported by RHN. If it was supported, you would not have dependency issues. Your last email was asking for help to resolve dependencies for an unsupported sendmail version. I'm not trying to chase you, or anyone else, off the list. I'm just pointing out that you may be able to receive better support to your queries from the mailing lists better suited to such queries. These mailing lists are provided on the links below. Please also note that Red Hat backports security fixes to the supported software releases, so from a security perspective, there's no difference between 8.13.1 and 8.13.5. Regards, Michael. -----Original Message----- From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Bill Watson Sent: Wednesday, 7 February 2007 9:27 AM To: 'Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)' Subject: RE: [rhn-users] RedHat sendmail 8.13.1 OK, I'll bite, exactly how is this up2date list not the proper one for getting the RHN up2date folks alerted and possibly propose solutions to the fact that up2date does not provide a more recent version of software that has a possibility of working? It appears that sendmail-8.13.1 was created July 30, 2004. Is this mailing list ONLY for legacy versions of software that up2date offers? I *have* read the countless emails that you have sent chasing folks off this list. Please clarify *how* this email is not appropriate to you for this list. Thank you, Bill Watson bill at magicdigits.com -----Original Message----- From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Mansour, Michael Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 2:08 PM To: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) Subject: RE: [rhn-users] RedHat sendmail 8.13.1 Hi Bill, Please refer this problem to a more appropriate mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/nahant-list [2] RHEL 3 Discussion - https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list [3] Red Hat System Administrators' list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list Thanks. Michael. -----Original Message----- From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Bill Watson Sent: Wednesday, 7 February 2007 8:49 AM To: 'Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)' Subject: RE: [rhn-users] RedHat sendmail 8.13.1 Goody! Now I get my favorite thing in all of life.... An endless loop of dependencies.... Is there a tool/trick that will handle going onto wherever and resolving dependencies without me chasing them all day? Thanks in advance, Bill Watson bill at magicdigits.com [root at hh installers]# rpm -i sendmail-8.13.7-2.fc4.2.i386.rpm warning: sendmail-8.13.7-2.fc4.2.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 4f2a6 fd2 error: Failed dependencies: libcrypto.so.5 is needed by sendmail-8.13.7-2.fc4.2.i386 libssl.so.5 is needed by sendmail-8.13.7-2.fc4.2.i386 [root at hh installers]# -----Original Message----- From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Steven Jones Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 12:45 PM To: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) Subject: RE: [rhn-users] RedHat sendmail 8.13.1 You could look at rpmfind.net and locate a newer rhas or fedora rpm and test..... Otherwise accelerate the issue via a problem record....if RH do not respond give your account rep a severe bashing. regards Steven Jones Senior Linux/Unix/San System Administrator APG -Technology Integration Team Victoria University of Wellington Phone: +64 4 463 6272 Mobile: +64 27 563 6272 -----Original Message----- From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Bill Watson Sent: Wednesday, 7 February 2007 9:39 a.m. To: 'Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)' Subject: [rhn-users] RedHat sendmail 8.13.1 Are there a whole bunch of reasons that RedHat doesn't have 8.13.8, or at least 8.13.5 as the available update for sendmail? There appears, based on google searches, to be a recurring problem where email to AOL accounts does not go through in the pre 8.13.5 releases of sendmail. AFAIK, 8.13.1 is RedHat's latest. If there are other solutions to this symptom, I am all ears. sendmail.org only has source RPM's and I'd rather have something that is RedHat specific if at all possible. FYI sysadmins, check /var/spool/mqueue for a pile of emails that are deferred, and have a good chance of being destined for AOL accounts. Thanks, Bill Watson bill at magicdigits.com _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users From inode0 at gmail.com Tue Feb 6 22:50:06 2007 From: inode0 at gmail.com (inode0) Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 16:50:06 -0600 Subject: [rhn-users] RedHat sendmail 8.13.1 In-Reply-To: <00e901c74a3d$dcec1b70$09000032@bill> References: <58727644D357E1429F7095BD0A297094045F8385@sgpexc05.asiapacific.cpqcorp.net> <00e901c74a3d$dcec1b70$09000032@bill> Message-ID: On 2/6/07, Bill Watson wrote: > OK, I'll bite, exactly how is this up2date list not the proper one for > getting the RHN up2date folks alerted and possibly propose solutions to the > fact that up2date does not provide a more recent version of software that > has a possibility of working? It appears that sendmail-8.13.1 was created > July 30, 2004. It has certainly been updated since then. # rpm -qi sendmail Name : sendmail Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 8.13.1 Vendor: Red Hat, Inc. Release : 3.RHEL4.5 Build Date: Fri 09 Jun 2006 09:00:12 AM CDT I don't know if it addresses the problem you are concerned about however. The question posed above I think is fine on this list, not that what I think matters much. John From s.steffann at computel.nl Tue Feb 6 23:13:05 2007 From: s.steffann at computel.nl (Sander Steffann) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 00:13:05 +0100 Subject: [rhn-users] Fwd: [rhn-satellite-users] Recent and Upcoming RHNAccount Policy Changes References: <45C8D60C.7070707@redhat.com> Message-ID: <003b01c74a44$5bd621a0$64c8a8c0@balefirehome> Hi, >> Another upcoming improvement related to this account policy change is a >> multi-organizational account management. Multi-organizational management >> will allow one Red Hat account to have 'sub-accounts.' So, for example, >> if you've 100 purchased RHEL AS subscriptions for your servers and 100 >> RHEL WS subscriptions for your workstations, you'll want to make sure >> that folks who should be running RHEL WS do not have access to RHEL AS >> and cannot access subscriptions from your server group. With these >> upcoming changes, you'll be able to split your account into different >> 'organizations', one that only has access to a particular set of RHEL WS >> subscriptions. Then you can create accounts in the WS organization for >> those users who you only want to have access to those WS subscriptions. >> Basically, this new account system will let you have better control over >> what subscriptions and systems users in your organization can access in >> RHN. Sounds VERY useful to us! > This has the potential to be a huge benefit to our organization. But > the devil is always in the details and now that the door is cracked > open a tiny bit here are a couple of questions to get the ball > rolling. > > Will there be administrative roles associated with a sub-account? Can > the organization admin assign sub-account admin privs to another > account enabling that account to control the goings on in the > sub-account (create users/keys/groups)? Good question. I hope the answer will be Yes :) Sander From bmw850csi3_kl at hotmail.com Wed Feb 7 00:42:29 2007 From: bmw850csi3_kl at hotmail.com (George Mast) Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 00:42:29 +0000 Subject: [rhn-users] ams for latex Message-ID: HI, Is ams package available in latex for redhat? I cannot find the .rpm. Thanks _________________________________________________________________ Get Hotmail, News, Sport and Entertainment from MSN on your mobile. http://www.msn.txt4content.com/ From NFlorez at sdcwa.org Wed Feb 7 17:59:25 2007 From: NFlorez at sdcwa.org (Florez, Nestor) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 09:59:25 -0800 Subject: [rhn-users] Hlep understanding Up2date Message-ID: <1CF7137E18C1234082F572E8A816DFAE0745F3BE@Octopus.sdcwa.org> I need help understanding up2date I set my server to be updated via up2date yesterday and in the process several files were remove. This morning I come in to find that mysql version 4 was removed and with that mysql-client and mysql-server. This is part of the up2date message: ==================================================== Package Installed: ['XFree86-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-Mesa-libGL-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-base-fonts-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-font-utils-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-libs-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-libs-data-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-xauth-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-xdm-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-xfs-4.3.0-115.EL', 'bind-9.2.4-20.EL3', 'bind-libs-9.2.4-20.EL3', 'bind-utils-9.2.4-20.EL3', 'fetchmail-6.2.0-3.el3.3', 'gnupg-1.2.1-19', 'info-4.5-3.el3.1', 'kdelibs-3.1.3-6.12', 'libgsf-1.6.0-7', 'openoffice.org-1.1.2-35.2.0.EL3', 'openoffice.org-libs-1.1.2-35.2.0.EL3', 'openssh-3.6.1p2-33.30.13', 'openssh-askpass-3.6.1p2-33.30.13', 'openssh-askpass-gnome-3.6.1p2-33.30.13', 'openssh-clients-3.6.1p2-33.30.13', 'openssh-server-3.6.1p2-33.30.13', 'perl-DBD-MySQL-2.1021-4.EL3', 'python-2.2.3-6.5', 'qt-3.1.2-14.RHEL3', 'sysreport-1.3.7.2-18', 'tar-1.13.25-15.RHEL3', 'tzdata-2006m-3.el3', 'XFree86-Mesa-libGLU-4.3.0-115.EL', 'mysql-3.23.58-16.RHEL3.1'] Package Added To Profile: ['XFree86-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-Mesa-libGL-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-Mesa-libGLU-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-base-fonts-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-font-utils-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-libs-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-libs-data-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-xauth-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-xdm-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-xfs-4.3.0-115.EL', 'bind-9.2.4-20.EL3', 'bind-libs-9.2.4-20.EL3', 'bind-utils-9.2.4-20.EL3', 'fetchmail-6.2.0-3.el3.3', 'gnupg-1.2.1-19', 'info-4.5-3.el3.1', 'kdelibs-3.1.3-6.12', 'libgsf-1.6.0-7', 'mysql-3.23.58-16.RHEL3.1', 'openoffice.org-1.1.2-35.2.0.EL3', 'openoffice.org-libs-1.1.2-35.2.0.EL3', 'openssh-3.6.1p2-33.30.13', 'openssh-askpass-3.6.1p2-33.30.13', 'openssh-askpass-gnome-3.6.1p2-33.30.13', 'openssh-clients-3.6.1p2-33.30.13', 'openssh-server-3.6.1p2-33.30.13', 'perl-DBD-MySQL-2.1021-4.EL3', 'python-2.2.3-6.5', 'qt-3.1.2-14.RHEL3', 'sysreport-1.3.7.2-18', 'tar-1.13.25-15.RHEL3', 'tzdata-2006m-3.el3'] Package Removed From Profile: ['MySQL-client-4.0.21-0', 'MySQL-server-4.0.21-0', 'XFree86-4.3.0-113.EL', 'XFree86-Mesa-libGL-4.3.0-113.EL', 'XFree86-base-fonts-4.3.0-113.EL', 'XFree86-font-utils-4.3.0-113.EL', 'XFree86-libs-4.3.0-113.EL', 'XFree86-libs-data-4.3.0-113.EL', 'XFree86-xauth-4.3.0-113.EL', 'XFree86-xdm-4.3.0-113.EL', 'XFree86-xfs-4.3.0-113.EL', 'bind-9.2.4-14_EL3', 'bind-libs-9.2.4-14_EL3', 'bind-utils-9.2.4-14_EL3', 'fetchmail-6.2.0-3.el3.2', 'gnupg-1.2.1-17', 'info-4.5-3', 'kdelibs-3.1.3-6.10', 'libgsf-1.6.0-4', 'openoffice.org-1.1.2-34.2.0.EL3', 'openoffice.org-libs-1.1.2-34.2.0.EL3', 'openssh-3.6.1p2-33.30.12', 'openssh-askpass-3.6.1p2-33.30.12', 'openssh-askpass-gnome-3.6.1p2-33.30.12', 'openssh-clients-3.6.1p2-33.30.12', 'openssh-server-3.6.1p2-33.30.12', 'perl-DBD-MySQL-2.1021-3', 'python-2.2.3-6.3', 'qt-3.1.2-13.4', 'sysreport-1.3.7.2-17', 'tar-1.13.25-14.RHEL3', 'tzdata-2006g-1.EL3'] =========================================================== Thanks, N?stor :-) From NFlorez at sdcwa.org Wed Feb 7 18:38:26 2007 From: NFlorez at sdcwa.org (Florez, Nestor) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 10:38:26 -0800 Subject: [rhn-users] FW: Help understanding Up2date Message-ID: <1CF7137E18C1234082F572E8A816DFAE0745F3BF@Octopus.sdcwa.org> Hi, I need help understanding up2date I set my server to be updated via up2date yesterday and in the process several files were remove. This morning I come in to find that mysql version 4 was removed and with that mysql-client and mysql-server. This is part of the up2date message: ==================================================== Package Installed: ['XFree86-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-Mesa-libGL-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-base-fonts-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-font-utils-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-libs-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-libs-data-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-xauth-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-xdm-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-xfs-4.3.0-115.EL', 'bind-9.2.4-20.EL3', 'bind-libs-9.2.4-20.EL3', 'bind-utils-9.2.4-20.EL3', 'fetchmail-6.2.0-3.el3.3', 'gnupg-1.2.1-19', 'info-4.5-3.el3.1', 'kdelibs-3.1.3-6.12', 'libgsf-1.6.0-7', 'openoffice.org-1.1.2-35.2.0.EL3', 'openoffice.org-libs-1.1.2-35.2.0.EL3', 'openssh-3.6.1p2-33.30.13', 'openssh-askpass-3.6.1p2-33.30.13', 'openssh-askpass-gnome-3.6.1p2-33.30.13', 'openssh-clients-3.6.1p2-33.30.13', 'openssh-server-3.6.1p2-33.30.13', 'perl-DBD-MySQL-2.1021-4.EL3', 'python-2.2.3-6.5', 'qt-3.1.2-14.RHEL3', 'sysreport-1.3.7.2-18', 'tar-1.13.25-15.RHEL3', 'tzdata-2006m-3.el3', 'XFree86-Mesa-libGLU-4.3.0-115.EL', 'mysql-3.23.58-16.RHEL3.1'] Package Added To Profile: ['XFree86-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-Mesa-libGL-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-Mesa-libGLU-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-base-fonts-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-font-utils-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-libs-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-libs-data-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-xauth-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-xdm-4.3.0-115.EL', 'XFree86-xfs-4.3.0-115.EL', 'bind-9.2.4-20.EL3', 'bind-libs-9.2.4-20.EL3', 'bind-utils-9.2.4-20.EL3', 'fetchmail-6.2.0-3.el3.3', 'gnupg-1.2.1-19', 'info-4.5-3.el3.1', 'kdelibs-3.1.3-6.12', 'libgsf-1.6.0-7', 'mysql-3.23.58-16.RHEL3.1', 'openoffice.org-1.1.2-35.2.0.EL3', 'openoffice.org-libs-1.1.2-35.2.0.EL3', 'openssh-3.6.1p2-33.30.13', 'openssh-askpass-3.6.1p2-33.30.13', 'openssh-askpass-gnome-3.6.1p2-33.30.13', 'openssh-clients-3.6.1p2-33.30.13', 'openssh-server-3.6.1p2-33.30.13', 'perl-DBD-MySQL-2.1021-4.EL3', 'python-2.2.3-6.5', 'qt-3.1.2-14.RHEL3', 'sysreport-1.3.7.2-18', 'tar-1.13.25-15.RHEL3', 'tzdata-2006m-3.el3'] Package Removed From Profile: ['MySQL-client-4.0.21-0', 'MySQL-server-4.0.21-0', 'XFree86-4.3.0-113.EL', 'XFree86-Mesa-libGL-4.3.0-113.EL', 'XFree86-base-fonts-4.3.0-113.EL', 'XFree86-font-utils-4.3.0-113.EL', 'XFree86-libs-4.3.0-113.EL', 'XFree86-libs-data-4.3.0-113.EL', 'XFree86-xauth-4.3.0-113.EL', 'XFree86-xdm-4.3.0-113.EL', 'XFree86-xfs-4.3.0-113.EL', 'bind-9.2.4-14_EL3', 'bind-libs-9.2.4-14_EL3', 'bind-utils-9.2.4-14_EL3', 'fetchmail-6.2.0-3.el3.2', 'gnupg-1.2.1-17', 'info-4.5-3', 'kdelibs-3.1.3-6.10', 'libgsf-1.6.0-4', 'openoffice.org-1.1.2-34.2.0.EL3', 'openoffice.org-libs-1.1.2-34.2.0.EL3', 'openssh-3.6.1p2-33.30.12', 'openssh-askpass-3.6.1p2-33.30.12', 'openssh-askpass-gnome-3.6.1p2-33.30.12', 'openssh-clients-3.6.1p2-33.30.12', 'openssh-server-3.6.1p2-33.30.12', 'perl-DBD-MySQL-2.1021-3', 'python-2.2.3-6.3', 'qt-3.1.2-13.4', 'sysreport-1.3.7.2-17', 'tar-1.13.25-14.RHEL3', 'tzdata-2006g-1.EL3'] =========================================================== Thanks, N?stor :-) From exfed at hotmail.com Wed Feb 7 19:46:01 2007 From: exfed at hotmail.com (Ex Fed) Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 19:46:01 +0000 Subject: [rhn-users] RE: rhn-users Digest, Vol 36, Issue 5 In-Reply-To: <20070207170007.728D8733D2@hormel.redhat.com> Message-ID: Another shortcoming that Red Hat Network and Up2date only has versions of software that Redhat has made available. I've seen certain tools indicate a version of software is vulnerable for a number of months before redhat has those patched versions available through redhat network or up2date. When I inquire to their mailing list regarding these issues they won't allow my emails to be sent to the list. I don't think that is good service for those of us who actually subscribe and pay for updates. Lee _________________________________________________________________ Get in the mood for Valentine's Day. View photos, recipes and more on your Live.com page. http://www.live.com/?addTemplate=ValentinesDay&ocid=T001MSN30A0701 From duffy at redhat.com Wed Feb 7 20:42:32 2007 From: duffy at redhat.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=E1ir=EDn_Duffy?=) Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 15:42:32 -0500 Subject: [rhn-users] RE: rhn-users Digest, Vol 36, Issue 5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <45CA39B8.9060600@redhat.com> Ex Fed wrote: > When I inquire to their mailing list regarding these issues they won't > allow my emails to be sent to the list. The only thing I can think of is that you may have tried to post to a mailing list that you were not a member of. It's a pretty standard spam prevention policy to restrict posts to members only on many mailing lists. Are you sure you were a member of the list(s) your message(s) did not get through to? I am one of the administrators of this list. Moderation tasks such as keeping the discussions on-topic has been an open community effort. Your messages are not being blocked by this list's administrators. ~m From inode0 at gmail.com Wed Feb 7 21:07:34 2007 From: inode0 at gmail.com (inode0) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 15:07:34 -0600 Subject: [rhn-users] RE: rhn-users Digest, Vol 36, Issue 5 In-Reply-To: References: <20070207170007.728D8733D2@hormel.redhat.com> Message-ID: On 2/7/07, Ex Fed wrote: > Another shortcoming that Red Hat Network and Up2date only has versions of > software that Redhat has made available. This depends on your point of view. Not getting a mess created by mixing repos is a benefit to a lot of folks. And while the Red Hat Network provides software blessed by Red Hat, you can easily configure up2date to access other repositories of software if you wish to do that. > I've seen certain tools indicate a version of software is vulnerable for a > number of months before redhat has those patched versions available through > redhat network or up2date. Recently? In my experience over the past couple of years I have not noticed this to have happened. Do you have examples? Red Hat's diligence in pushing out security errata is one of Red Hat's strengths I think. John From Steven.Jones at vuw.ac.nz Wed Feb 7 21:12:19 2007 From: Steven.Jones at vuw.ac.nz (Steven Jones) Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 10:12:19 +1300 Subject: [rhn-users] RE: rhn-users Digest, Vol 36, Issue 5 Message-ID: <75CF552F30ECFA439D9B3008906F2A37012837B6@STAWINCOMAILCL1.staff.vuw.ac.nz> I have a mailman rpm with a bug fixed by mailman in 2005, yet it is not in the rhas3 yet.....indeed support tells me it may never be put in so I have to patch it from the mailman tree....kinda blows away the reason for getting rhas in the first place when I start to roll my own solutions........... regards Steven Jones Senior Linux/Unix/San System Administrator APG -Technology Integration Team Victoria University of Wellington Phone: +64 4 463 6272 Mobile: +64 27 563 6272 -----Original Message----- From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of inode0 Sent: Thursday, 8 February 2007 10:08 a.m. To: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) Subject: Re: [rhn-users] RE: rhn-users Digest, Vol 36, Issue 5 On 2/7/07, Ex Fed wrote: > Another shortcoming that Red Hat Network and Up2date only has versions of > software that Redhat has made available. This depends on your point of view. Not getting a mess created by mixing repos is a benefit to a lot of folks. And while the Red Hat Network provides software blessed by Red Hat, you can easily configure up2date to access other repositories of software if you wish to do that. > I've seen certain tools indicate a version of software is vulnerable for a > number of months before redhat has those patched versions available through > redhat network or up2date. Recently? In my experience over the past couple of years I have not noticed this to have happened. Do you have examples? Red Hat's diligence in pushing out security errata is one of Red Hat's strengths I think. John _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users From inode0 at gmail.com Wed Feb 7 21:20:24 2007 From: inode0 at gmail.com (inode0) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 15:20:24 -0600 Subject: [rhn-users] RE: rhn-users Digest, Vol 36, Issue 5 In-Reply-To: <75CF552F30ECFA439D9B3008906F2A37012837B6@STAWINCOMAILCL1.staff.vuw.ac.nz> References: <75CF552F30ECFA439D9B3008906F2A37012837B6@STAWINCOMAILCL1.staff.vuw.ac.nz> Message-ID: On 2/7/07, Steven Jones wrote: > I have a mailman rpm with a bug fixed by mailman in 2005, yet it is not > in the rhas3 yet.....indeed support tells me it may never be put in so I > have to patch it from the mailman tree....kinda blows away the reason > for getting rhas in the first place when I start to roll my own > solutions........... Security fixes and other bug fixes are naturally treated differently. Is your mailman issue something that leaves your system or service vulnerable to attack? RHEL3 is in deployment support now so I would think Red Hat would still fix bugs that aren't security related unless they are of very little consequence. John From Steven.Jones at vuw.ac.nz Wed Feb 7 21:43:21 2007 From: Steven.Jones at vuw.ac.nz (Steven Jones) Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 10:43:21 +1300 Subject: [rhn-users] RE: rhn-users Digest, Vol 36, Issue 5 Message-ID: <75CF552F30ECFA439D9B3008906F2A37012837BE@STAWINCOMAILCL1.staff.vuw.ac.nz> Yes.... regards Steven Jones Senior Linux/Unix/San System Administrator APG -Technology Integration Team Victoria University of Wellington Phone: +64 4 463 6272 Mobile: +64 27 563 6272 -----Original Message----- From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of inode0 Sent: Thursday, 8 February 2007 10:20 a.m. To: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) Subject: Re: [rhn-users] RE: rhn-users Digest, Vol 36, Issue 5 On 2/7/07, Steven Jones wrote: > I have a mailman rpm with a bug fixed by mailman in 2005, yet it is not > in the rhas3 yet.....indeed support tells me it may never be put in so I > have to patch it from the mailman tree....kinda blows away the reason > for getting rhas in the first place when I start to roll my own > solutions........... Security fixes and other bug fixes are naturally treated differently. Is your mailman issue something that leaves your system or service vulnerable to attack? RHEL3 is in deployment support now so I would think Red Hat would still fix bugs that aren't security related unless they are of very little consequence. John _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users From inode0 at gmail.com Wed Feb 7 22:02:28 2007 From: inode0 at gmail.com (inode0) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 16:02:28 -0600 Subject: [rhn-users] RE: rhn-users Digest, Vol 36, Issue 5 In-Reply-To: <75CF552F30ECFA439D9B3008906F2A37012837BE@STAWINCOMAILCL1.staff.vuw.ac.nz> References: <75CF552F30ECFA439D9B3008906F2A37012837BE@STAWINCOMAILCL1.staff.vuw.ac.nz> Message-ID: On 2/7/07, Steven Jones wrote: > Yes.... Do you have a CVE for the issue? Since I have users also using mailman I'd be interested in details so I can investigate and also raise my concerns with Red Hat if this package has an unaddressed vulnerability. Thanks, John From rene at compounddata.com Sat Feb 10 09:41:25 2007 From: rene at compounddata.com (Rene Cunningham) Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 20:41:25 +1100 Subject: [rhn-users] uploading custom RPMs to RHN Message-ID: <20070210094125.GB16916@grimlock.compounddata.com> Hello World, How can i upload custom RPMs to RHN? I cant seem to find the section to do this within the RHN web interface. >From what i understand from the 'Channel Management Guide'[0] i need RHN Proxy Server' or 'RHN Satellite Server', which i do not own. I am using RHELv5 Beta. Cheers. [0] - http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/RHNetwork/ref-guide/chan-mgmt/4.1.0/ch-upload-pkgs.html -- Rene From inode0 at gmail.com Sat Feb 10 13:50:15 2007 From: inode0 at gmail.com (inode0) Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 07:50:15 -0600 Subject: [rhn-users] uploading custom RPMs to RHN In-Reply-To: <20070210094125.GB16916@grimlock.compounddata.com> References: <20070210094125.GB16916@grimlock.compounddata.com> Message-ID: On 2/10/07, Rene Cunningham wrote: > Hello World, > > How can i upload custom RPMs to RHN? I cant seem to find the section to > do this within the RHN web interface. I don't think you can. Even with a proxy or satellite only header information gets uploaded to RHN, not the actual packages themselves. John From inode0 at gmail.com Sat Feb 10 15:08:19 2007 From: inode0 at gmail.com (inode0) Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 09:08:19 -0600 Subject: [rhn-users] Network Installations via RHN Proxy Servers Message-ID: While I know there is no official support for this, everyone must do it or arrange network installs from somewhere else. We maintain network install trees for RHEL3, RHEL4, FC5, and FC6 currently and I am getting tired of doing an installation and then needing to apply hundreds of updates immediately after a fresh install. It doesn't seem to me that it would be that difficult to update the installation trees as packages are updated so a fresh install will be current right after it finishes. I am quite capable of not understanding why some things are problematic though. At least that would be a lot nicer for users who do interactive installs. Can someone tell me what would need to be changed in these trees? I'm thinking some repodata mods would be required for the fedora side and perhaps something in the base directory on the RHEL side. And then there is the question of how to get the updated packages from RHN to put into the trees. mrepo is the only tool I'm vaguely aware of that allows grabbing such updates in a single location. It would be nice though if Red Hat just accommodated the need for this directly. Thanks, John From Frank_LaMon at csx.com Sat Feb 10 15:13:18 2007 From: Frank_LaMon at csx.com (Lamon, Frank III) Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 10:13:18 -0500 Subject: [rhn-users] Network Installations via RHN Proxy Servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <5485CD8F71979F4093B2EA34A613FACA175C2BD4@TJAX2735EXCH.csxt.ad.csx.com> Can't you just update your install trees with the RPMs from the latest RHEL CDs/ISOs? -----Original Message----- From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com]On Behalf Of inode0 Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2007 10:08 AM To: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) Subject: [rhn-users] Network Installations via RHN Proxy Servers While I know there is no official support for this, everyone must do it or arrange network installs from somewhere else. We maintain network install trees for RHEL3, RHEL4, FC5, and FC6 currently and I am getting tired of doing an installation and then needing to apply hundreds of updates immediately after a fresh install. It doesn't seem to me that it would be that difficult to update the installation trees as packages are updated so a fresh install will be current right after it finishes. I am quite capable of not understanding why some things are problematic though. At least that would be a lot nicer for users who do interactive installs. Can someone tell me what would need to be changed in these trees? I'm thinking some repodata mods would be required for the fedora side and perhaps something in the base directory on the RHEL side. And then there is the question of how to get the updated packages from RHN to put into the trees. mrepo is the only tool I'm vaguely aware of that allows grabbing such updates in a single location. It would be nice though if Red Hat just accommodated the need for this directly. Thanks, John _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users ----------------------------------------- This email transmission and any accompanying attachments may contain CSX privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the intended addressee. Any dissemination, distribution, copying or action taken in reliance on the contents of this email by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please immediately delete it and notify sender at the above CSX email address. Sender and CSX accept no liability for any damage caused directly or indirectly by receipt of this email. From inode0 at gmail.com Sat Feb 10 15:19:27 2007 From: inode0 at gmail.com (inode0) Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 09:19:27 -0600 Subject: [rhn-users] Network Installations via RHN Proxy Servers In-Reply-To: <5485CD8F71979F4093B2EA34A613FACA175C2BD4@TJAX2735EXCH.csxt.ad.csx.com> References: <5485CD8F71979F4093B2EA34A613FACA175C2BD4@TJAX2735EXCH.csxt.ad.csx.com> Message-ID: On 2/10/07, Lamon, Frank III wrote: > Can't you just update your install trees with the RPMs from the latest RHEL CDs/ISOs? Our install trees use the latest ISO's. Red Hat only updates those when they bump the update level and in the meantime hundreds of packages on them become out of date. John From mike at mommabears.com Sat Feb 10 15:30:35 2007 From: mike at mommabears.com (MJang) Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 07:30:35 -0800 Subject: [rhn-users] Network Installations via RHN Proxy Servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1171121435.5810.6.camel@localhost> On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 09:08 -0600, inode0 wrote: > While I know there is no official support for this, everyone must do > it or arrange network installs from somewhere else. We maintain > network install trees for RHEL3, RHEL4, FC5, and FC6 currently and I > am getting tired of doing an installation and then needing to apply > hundreds of updates immediately after a fresh install. > > It doesn't seem to me that it would be that difficult to update the > installation trees as packages are updated so a fresh install will be > current right after it finishes. It sounds like you're looking for a consolidated install repository, with updates already included, so you can avoid an update cycle. Getting updated packages might be easier once RHEL5 is released, as they're moving towards yum updates. I'm not sure what you need beyond createrepo. The evolving Koan (Kickstart over a network) tool looks like an interesting future addition too. Thanks, Mike From inode0 at gmail.com Sat Feb 10 16:12:40 2007 From: inode0 at gmail.com (inode0) Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 10:12:40 -0600 Subject: [rhn-users] Network Installations via RHN Proxy Servers In-Reply-To: <1171121435.5810.6.camel@localhost> References: <1171121435.5810.6.camel@localhost> Message-ID: On 2/10/07, MJang wrote: > On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 09:08 -0600, inode0 wrote: > > While I know there is no official support for this, everyone must do > > it or arrange network installs from somewhere else. We maintain > > network install trees for RHEL3, RHEL4, FC5, and FC6 currently and I > > am getting tired of doing an installation and then needing to apply > > hundreds of updates immediately after a fresh install. > > > > It doesn't seem to me that it would be that difficult to update the > > installation trees as packages are updated so a fresh install will be > > current right after it finishes. > > It sounds like you're looking for a consolidated install repository, > with updates already included, so you can avoid an update cycle. Exactly. > Getting updated packages might be easier once RHEL5 is released, as > they're moving towards yum updates. I can hope, but even with yum there is a problem getting the aggregation of updates onto one machine that is the distribution point for all network installations. > I'm not sure what you need beyond createrepo. The evolving Koan > (Kickstart over a network) tool looks like an interesting future > addition too. I'm not too concerned about our kickstart users now, they can automate the updates at the end and typically aren't sitting at the box waiting for the installation to complete. But to help our many newer RHEL users we provide a special installation ISO from which they can interactively select which version of the OS they want to install from a grub menu at boot time and the installation will proceed over the network eliminating the hassles associated with each user obtaining a pile of ISOs and correctly burning them and flipping them in and out during the install, etc. In these interactive cases, the need to apply hundreds of updates at the end of what they expect is the installation of a fresh OS is not only annoying to them but doesn't really convey the impression of a polished installation system. It seems to me we should be able to do this better so after the anaconda install the user has an up to date installation of the OS. John From mike at mommabears.com Sat Feb 10 17:31:35 2007 From: mike at mommabears.com (MJang) Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 09:31:35 -0800 Subject: [rhn-users] Network Installations via RHN Proxy Servers In-Reply-To: References: <1171121435.5810.6.camel@localhost> Message-ID: <1171128695.5810.11.camel@localhost> On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 10:12 -0600, inode0 wrote: > On 2/10/07, MJang wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 09:08 -0600, inode0 wrote: > > > While I know there is no official support for this, everyone must do > > > it or arrange network installs from somewhere else. We maintain > > > network install trees for RHEL3, RHEL4, FC5, and FC6 currently and I > > > am getting tired of doing an installation and then needing to apply > > > hundreds of updates immediately after a fresh install. > > > > > > It doesn't seem to me that it would be that difficult to update the > > > installation trees as packages are updated so a fresh install will be > > > current right after it finishes. > > > > It sounds like you're looking for a consolidated install repository, > > with updates already included, so you can avoid an update cycle. > > Exactly. > > > Getting updated packages might be easier once RHEL5 is released, as > > they're moving towards yum updates. > > I can hope, but even with yum there is a problem getting the > aggregation of updates onto one machine that is the distribution point > for all network installations. Right, now that I've had some coffee, there's also the anaconda tools that you need to update the installation programs and key files such as comps.xml (or whatever it is Red Hat is moving towards on RHEL 5). > > > I'm not sure what you need beyond createrepo. The evolving Koan > > (Kickstart over a network) tool looks like an interesting future > > addition too. > > I'm not too concerned about our kickstart users now, they can automate > the updates at the end and typically aren't sitting at the box waiting > for the installation to complete. But to help our many newer RHEL > users we provide a special installation ISO from which they can > interactively select which version of the OS they want to install from > a grub menu at boot time and the installation will proceed over the > network eliminating the hassles associated with each user obtaining a > pile of ISOs and correctly burning them and flipping them in and out > during the install, etc. In these interactive cases, the need to apply > hundreds of updates at the end of what they expect is the installation > of a fresh OS is not only annoying to them but doesn't really convey > the impression of a polished installation system. Getting the anaconda tools working with an install repo infused with updates would be trickier, almost like creating a custom anaconda spin with each update cycle. Otherwise, things don't look "polished." > > It seems to me we should be able to do this better so after the > anaconda install the user has an up to date installation of the OS. I don't know if they have more insight on the Anaconda list. I know there are lots of people there look to create their own custom spins, with varying degrees of success. Thanks, Mike From vishalgaurav01 at gmail.com Sat Feb 10 17:39:09 2007 From: vishalgaurav01 at gmail.com (Vishal Gaurav) Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 23:09:09 +0530 Subject: [rhn-users] Bluetooth Message-ID: <9da2dbd10702100939w277d3b21xdec7e5ac40358ad7@mail.gmail.com> Hi all, How can i install bluetooth device to able run internet via mobile phone. -- Vishal Gaurav -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dag at wieers.com Sun Feb 11 19:56:52 2007 From: dag at wieers.com (Dag Wieers) Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 20:56:52 +0100 (CET) Subject: [rhn-users] Network Installations via RHN Proxy Servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Sat, 10 Feb 2007, inode0 wrote: > While I know there is no official support for this, everyone must do > it or arrange network installs from somewhere else. We maintain > network install trees for RHEL3, RHEL4, FC5, and FC6 currently and I > am getting tired of doing an installation and then needing to apply > hundreds of updates immediately after a fresh install. > > It doesn't seem to me that it would be that difficult to update the > installation trees as packages are updated so a fresh install will be > current right after it finishes. I am quite capable of not > understanding why some things are problematic though. At least that > would be a lot nicer for users who do interactive installs. > > Can someone tell me what would need to be changed in these trees? I'm > thinking some repodata mods would be required for the fedora side and > perhaps something in the base directory on the RHEL side. And then > there is the question of how to get the updated packages from RHN to > put into the trees. mrepo is the only tool I'm vaguely aware of that > allows grabbing such updates in a single location. It would be nice > though if Red Hat just accommodated the need for this directly. We've discussed doing this on the mailinglist (and I have had some conversations with people that have this on their wishlist). One of the problems is the differences between distributions, another is the fact that mrepo starts from ISO images (and as a result are read-only mounted) to save disk space. What I am interested to look at is using fuse/unionfs to make the ISO-images modifiable and as a result rewrite the on-disc metadata to accomodate kickstart installations. For this mrepo needs an understanding of anaconda's metadata and apply the correct methodology, unionfs integration and the metadata re-generation functionality. Usually mrepo development is driven by effort from users. The best way to get new features in mrepo is looking into specifics, join discussions and providing patches/information. PS Starting with RHEL5 this is really no longer necessary as RHEL5 allows to use normal yum repositories. The fact that Yum is now moving to an sqlite metadata format will probably mean that for FC7/RHEL6 will again have a different methodology :) Kind regards, -- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power] From inode0 at gmail.com Sun Feb 11 21:28:26 2007 From: inode0 at gmail.com (inode0) Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:28:26 -0600 Subject: [rhn-users] Network Installations via RHN Proxy Servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 2/11/07, Dag Wieers wrote: > We've discussed doing this on the mailinglist (and I have had some > conversations with people that have this on their wishlist). > > One of the problems is the differences between distributions, another is > the fact that mrepo starts from ISO images (and as a result are read-only > mounted) to save disk space. > > What I am interested to look at is using fuse/unionfs to make the > ISO-images modifiable and as a result rewrite the on-disc metadata to > accomodate kickstart installations. While this is interesting for mrepo, my focus now is more on fixing up the anaconda metadata so installs can proceed from on-disk installation trees. That would be one step toward what mrepo would need at least. So does anyone know of tools for doing this before I start down the "figure it out yourself" development branch? > For this mrepo needs an understanding of anaconda's metadata and apply the > correct methodology, unionfs integration and the metadata re-generation > functionality. > > Usually mrepo development is driven by effort from users. The best way to > get new features in mrepo is looking into specifics, join discussions and > providing patches/information. > > PS Starting with RHEL5 this is really no longer necessary as RHEL5 allows > to use normal yum repositories. The fact that Yum is now moving to an > sqlite metadata format will probably mean that for FC7/RHEL6 will again > have a different methodology :) Can you help me understand how this makes it possible? Presumably this means that I could now be doing up to date installs of FC5 and FC6 rather than what I am doing (dropping the original ISOs into an installation tree and doing hundreds of package updates after the install completes). Thanks, John From dag at wieers.com Sun Feb 11 21:43:31 2007 From: dag at wieers.com (Dag Wieers) Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 22:43:31 +0100 (CET) Subject: [rhn-users] Network Installations via RHN Proxy Servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, inode0 wrote: > On 2/11/07, Dag Wieers wrote: > > > For this mrepo needs an understanding of anaconda's metadata and apply the > > correct methodology, unionfs integration and the metadata re-generation > > functionality. > > > > Usually mrepo development is driven by effort from users. The best way to > > get new features in mrepo is looking into specifics, join discussions and > > providing patches/information. > > > > PS Starting with RHEL5 this is really no longer necessary as RHEL5 allows > > to use normal yum repositories. The fact that Yum is now moving to an > > sqlite metadata format will probably mean that for FC7/RHEL6 will again > > have a different methodology :) > > Can you help me understand how this makes it possible? Presumably this > means that I could now be doing up to date installs of FC5 and FC6 > rather than what I am doing (dropping the original ISOs into an > installation tree and doing hundreds of package updates after the > install completes). For FC6 (and probably FC5) you can just point to the RPMS directory that has repomd metadata. So both should already work with a normal merged mrepo repository. (os+updates) Kind regards, -- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power] From duffy at redhat.com Sun Feb 11 23:44:00 2007 From: duffy at redhat.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=E1ir=EDn_Duffy?=) Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 18:44:00 -0500 Subject: [rhn-users] Bluetooth In-Reply-To: <9da2dbd10702100939w277d3b21xdec7e5ac40358ad7@mail.gmail.com> References: <9da2dbd10702100939w277d3b21xdec7e5ac40358ad7@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <45CFAA40.4010307@redhat.com> Hi Vishal, Vishal Gaurav wrote: > Hi all, > How can i install bluetooth device to able run internet via mobile phone. This is a mailing list for discussions about using Red Hat Network to manage and apply updates to Red Hat Enterprise Linux, including discussion about particular Red Hat Enterprise Linux updates. This list is not intended for discussion about topics specific to Red Hat Enterprise Linux that do not involve Red Hat Network. For discussion of such topics, you may want to try: [1] RHEL 4 Discussion - https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/nahant-list [2] RHEL 3 Discussion - https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list [3] Red Hat System Administrators' list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list For Bluetooth-specific information, you may want to try the following website: http://www.holtmann.org/linux/bluetooth/ Particularly the following two documents linked to from there look like they may help: http://www.niemueller.de/wiki/?GPRSviaBluetooth http://www.teaparty.net/technotes/blue-gprs.html Good Luck, ~m From dcalhoun at blomand.net Mon Feb 12 02:16:47 2007 From: dcalhoun at blomand.net (Dennis D. Calhoun) Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 20:16:47 -0600 Subject: [rhn-users] Bluetooth In-Reply-To: <45CFAA40.4010307@redhat.com> References: <9da2dbd10702100939w277d3b21xdec7e5ac40358ad7@mail.gmail.com> <45CFAA40.4010307@redhat.com> Message-ID: <000001c74e4b$da1a9f40$0100a8c0@dennis1> Respectfully, your boilerplate is a bit long, but I do agree with it, in substance. -- Dennis D. Calhoun, MCSA > -----Original Message----- > From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com > [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of M?ir?n Duffy > Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 5:44 PM > To: Discussions about Red Hat Network rhnredhatcom > Subject: Re: [rhn-users] Bluetooth > > Hi Vishal, > > Vishal Gaurav wrote: > > Hi all, > > How can i install bluetooth device to able run internet via > mobile phone. > > This is a mailing list for discussions about using Red Hat > Network to manage and apply updates to Red Hat Enterprise > Linux, including discussion about particular Red Hat > Enterprise Linux updates. > > This list is not intended for discussion about topics > specific to Red Hat Enterprise Linux that do not involve Red > Hat Network. For discussion of such topics, you may want to try: > > [1] RHEL 4 Discussion - > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/nahant-list > [2] RHEL 3 Discussion - > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list > [3] Red Hat System Administrators' list: > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list > > For Bluetooth-specific information, you may want to try the following > website: > > http://www.holtmann.org/linux/bluetooth/ > > Particularly the following two documents linked to from there > look like they may help: > > http://www.niemueller.de/wiki/?GPRSviaBluetooth > http://www.teaparty.net/technotes/blue-gprs.html > > Good Luck, > ~m > > _______________________________________________ > rhn-users mailing list > rhn-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users > From vishalgaurav01 at gmail.com Mon Feb 12 17:14:41 2007 From: vishalgaurav01 at gmail.com (Vishal Gaurav) Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 22:44:41 +0530 Subject: [rhn-users] Re: rhn-users Digest, Vol 36, Issue 10 In-Reply-To: <20070212170004.362557312E@hormel.redhat.com> References: <20070212170004.362557312E@hormel.redhat.com> Message-ID: <9da2dbd10702120914r139707c7nfd13d278db36e05e@mail.gmail.com> Hi, I am just installed new os.Please tell me how can i connect internet via bluetooth via mobile phone.i am also activated gprs interner service.Pleasehelp me On 2/12/07, rhn-users-request at redhat.com wrote: > > Send rhn-users mailing list submissions to > rhn-users at redhat.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > rhn-users-request at redhat.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at > rhn-users-owner at redhat.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of rhn-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Network Installations via RHN Proxy Servers (Dag Wieers) > 2. Re: Network Installations via RHN Proxy Servers (inode0) > 3. Re: Network Installations via RHN Proxy Servers (Dag Wieers) > 4. Re: Bluetooth (M?ir?n Duffy) > 5. RE: Bluetooth (Dennis D. Calhoun) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 20:56:52 +0100 (CET) > From: Dag Wieers > Subject: Re: [rhn-users] Network Installations via RHN Proxy Servers > To: "Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)" > > Message-ID: > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > > On Sat, 10 Feb 2007, inode0 wrote: > > > While I know there is no official support for this, everyone must do > > it or arrange network installs from somewhere else. We maintain > > network install trees for RHEL3, RHEL4, FC5, and FC6 currently and I > > am getting tired of doing an installation and then needing to apply > > hundreds of updates immediately after a fresh install. > > > > It doesn't seem to me that it would be that difficult to update the > > installation trees as packages are updated so a fresh install will be > > current right after it finishes. I am quite capable of not > > understanding why some things are problematic though. At least that > > would be a lot nicer for users who do interactive installs. > > > > Can someone tell me what would need to be changed in these trees? I'm > > thinking some repodata mods would be required for the fedora side and > > perhaps something in the base directory on the RHEL side. And then > > there is the question of how to get the updated packages from RHN to > > put into the trees. mrepo is the only tool I'm vaguely aware of that > > allows grabbing such updates in a single location. It would be nice > > though if Red Hat just accommodated the need for this directly. > > We've discussed doing this on the mailinglist (and I have had some > conversations with people that have this on their wishlist). > > One of the problems is the differences between distributions, another is > the fact that mrepo starts from ISO images (and as a result are read-only > mounted) to save disk space. > > What I am interested to look at is using fuse/unionfs to make the > ISO-images modifiable and as a result rewrite the on-disc metadata to > accomodate kickstart installations. > > For this mrepo needs an understanding of anaconda's metadata and apply the > correct methodology, unionfs integration and the metadata re-generation > functionality. > > Usually mrepo development is driven by effort from users. The best way to > get new features in mrepo is looking into specifics, join discussions and > providing patches/information. > > PS Starting with RHEL5 this is really no longer necessary as RHEL5 allows > to use normal yum repositories. The fact that Yum is now moving to an > sqlite metadata format will probably mean that for FC7/RHEL6 will again > have a different methodology :) > > Kind regards, > -- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- > [all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power] > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:28:26 -0600 > From: inode0 > Subject: Re: [rhn-users] Network Installations via RHN Proxy Servers > To: "Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)" > > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > On 2/11/07, Dag Wieers wrote: > > We've discussed doing this on the mailinglist (and I have had some > > conversations with people that have this on their wishlist). > > > > One of the problems is the differences between distributions, another is > > the fact that mrepo starts from ISO images (and as a result are > read-only > > mounted) to save disk space. > > > > What I am interested to look at is using fuse/unionfs to make the > > ISO-images modifiable and as a result rewrite the on-disc metadata to > > accomodate kickstart installations. > > While this is interesting for mrepo, my focus now is more on fixing up > the anaconda metadata so installs can proceed from on-disk > installation trees. That would be one step toward what mrepo would > need at least. > > So does anyone know of tools for doing this before I start down the > "figure it out yourself" development branch? > > > For this mrepo needs an understanding of anaconda's metadata and apply > the > > correct methodology, unionfs integration and the metadata re-generation > > functionality. > > > > Usually mrepo development is driven by effort from users. The best way > to > > get new features in mrepo is looking into specifics, join discussions > and > > providing patches/information. > > > > PS Starting with RHEL5 this is really no longer necessary as RHEL5 > allows > > to use normal yum repositories. The fact that Yum is now moving to an > > sqlite metadata format will probably mean that for FC7/RHEL6 will again > > have a different methodology :) > > Can you help me understand how this makes it possible? Presumably this > means that I could now be doing up to date installs of FC5 and FC6 > rather than what I am doing (dropping the original ISOs into an > installation tree and doing hundreds of package updates after the > install completes). > > Thanks, > John > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 22:43:31 +0100 (CET) > From: Dag Wieers > Subject: Re: [rhn-users] Network Installations via RHN Proxy Servers > To: "Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)" > > Message-ID: > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > > On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, inode0 wrote: > > > On 2/11/07, Dag Wieers wrote: > > > > > For this mrepo needs an understanding of anaconda's metadata and apply > the > > > correct methodology, unionfs integration and the metadata > re-generation > > > functionality. > > > > > > Usually mrepo development is driven by effort from users. The best way > to > > > get new features in mrepo is looking into specifics, join discussions > and > > > providing patches/information. > > > > > > PS Starting with RHEL5 this is really no longer necessary as RHEL5 > allows > > > to use normal yum repositories. The fact that Yum is now moving to an > > > sqlite metadata format will probably mean that for FC7/RHEL6 will > again > > > have a different methodology :) > > > > Can you help me understand how this makes it possible? Presumably this > > means that I could now be doing up to date installs of FC5 and FC6 > > rather than what I am doing (dropping the original ISOs into an > > installation tree and doing hundreds of package updates after the > > install completes). > > For FC6 (and probably FC5) you can just point to the RPMS directory that > has repomd metadata. So both should already work with a normal merged > mrepo repository. (os+updates) > > Kind regards, > -- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- > [all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power] > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 18:44:00 -0500 > From: M?ir?n Duffy > Subject: Re: [rhn-users] Bluetooth > To: "Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)" > > Message-ID: <45CFAA40.4010307 at redhat.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Hi Vishal, > > Vishal Gaurav wrote: > > Hi all, > > How can i install bluetooth device to able run internet via mobile > phone. > > This is a mailing list for discussions about using Red Hat Network to > manage and apply updates to Red Hat Enterprise Linux, including > discussion about particular Red Hat Enterprise Linux updates. > > This list is not intended for discussion about topics specific to Red > Hat Enterprise Linux that do not involve Red Hat Network. For discussion > of such topics, you may want to try: > > [1] RHEL 4 Discussion - > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/nahant-list > [2] RHEL 3 Discussion - > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list > [3] Red Hat System Administrators' list: > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list > > For Bluetooth-specific information, you may want to try the following > website: > > http://www.holtmann.org/linux/bluetooth/ > > Particularly the following two documents linked to from there look like > they may help: > > http://www.niemueller.de/wiki/?GPRSviaBluetooth > http://www.teaparty.net/technotes/blue-gprs.html > > Good Luck, > ~m > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 20:16:47 -0600 > From: "Dennis D. Calhoun" > Subject: RE: [rhn-users] Bluetooth > To: "'Discussions about Red Hat Network rhnredhatcom'" > > Message-ID: <000001c74e4b$da1a9f40$0100a8c0 at dennis1> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Respectfully, your boilerplate is a bit long, but I do agree with it, > in substance. > > -- > Dennis D. Calhoun, MCSA > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com > > [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of M?ir?n Duffy > > Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 5:44 PM > > To: Discussions about Red Hat Network rhnredhatcom > > Subject: Re: [rhn-users] Bluetooth > > > > Hi Vishal, > > > > Vishal Gaurav wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > How can i install bluetooth device to able run internet via > > mobile phone. > > > > This is a mailing list for discussions about using Red Hat > > Network to manage and apply updates to Red Hat Enterprise > > Linux, including discussion about particular Red Hat > > Enterprise Linux updates. > > > > This list is not intended for discussion about topics > > specific to Red Hat Enterprise Linux that do not involve Red > > Hat Network. For discussion of such topics, you may want to try: > > > > [1] RHEL 4 Discussion - > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/nahant-list > > [2] RHEL 3 Discussion - > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list > > [3] Red Hat System Administrators' list: > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list > > > > For Bluetooth-specific information, you may want to try the > following > > website: > > > > http://www.holtmann.org/linux/bluetooth/ > > > > Particularly the following two documents linked to from there > > look like they may help: > > > > http://www.niemueller.de/wiki/?GPRSviaBluetooth > > http://www.teaparty.net/technotes/blue-gprs.html > > > > Good Luck, > > ~m > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rhn-users mailing list > > rhn-users at redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > rhn-users mailing list > rhn-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users > > End of rhn-users Digest, Vol 36, Issue 10 > ***************************************** > -- Vishal Gaurav -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From inode0 at gmail.com Wed Feb 14 19:43:55 2007 From: inode0 at gmail.com (inode0) Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:43:55 -0600 Subject: [rhn-users] RE: rhn-users Digest, Vol 36, Issue 5 In-Reply-To: References: <75CF552F30ECFA439D9B3008906F2A37012837BE@STAWINCOMAILCL1.staff.vuw.ac.nz> Message-ID: On 2/7/07, inode0 wrote: > On 2/7/07, Steven Jones wrote: > > Yes.... > > Do you have a CVE for the issue? Since I have users also using mailman > I'd be interested in details so I can investigate and also raise my > concerns with Red Hat if this package has an unaddressed > vulnerability. Just so no one is left with the wrong impression about this, I feel I should report that I have not received a CVE or any other evidence of known vulnerabilities that Red Hat has not responded to so far. John From Bob.Peterson at AlaskaAir.com Wed Feb 14 20:32:43 2007 From: Bob.Peterson at AlaskaAir.com (Bob Peterson) Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:32:43 -0800 Subject: [rhn-users] New Daylight Savings Time Change? Message-ID: Hi, Has there been a patch for the new Daylight Savings Time Change? Bob P Message has been checked for viruses by AAG MailScan From sonnyjz at isc.upenn.edu Wed Feb 14 22:12:17 2007 From: sonnyjz at isc.upenn.edu (Sonny J Zambrana) Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:12:17 -0500 Subject: [rhn-users] New Daylight Savings Time Change? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: tzdata is the package you want to update. Has been updated for quite some time. The latest one if from November I believe. Sonny Zambrana University Of Pennsylvania On Feb 14, 2007, at 3:32 PM, Bob Peterson wrote: > Hi, > > Has there been a patch for the new Daylight Savings Time Change? > > Bob P > > > Message has been checked for viruses by AAG MailScan > > _______________________________________________ > rhn-users mailing list > rhn-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 3891 bytes Desc: not available URL: From inode0 at gmail.com Wed Feb 14 22:14:16 2007 From: inode0 at gmail.com (inode0) Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:14:16 -0600 Subject: [rhn-users] New Daylight Savings Time Change? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 2/14/07, Bob Peterson wrote: > Hi, > > Has there been a patch for the new Daylight Savings Time Change? Yes, long long ago. If you want to check a particular machine you can run # zdump -v /etc/localtime | grep 2007 and see if it is patched already, which it likely is if you apply errata from RHN. John From Wim.de.Haan at dalsa.com Thu Feb 15 09:11:08 2007 From: Wim.de.Haan at dalsa.com (Wim.de.Haan at dalsa.com) Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:11:08 +0100 Subject: [rhn-users] up2date vs iso updates Message-ID: Hi, I'm new to Red Hat. I maintain a server with RHEL-4. I'm a bit confused on the RHEL4 ISOs which can be downloaded from RHN. The server came installed with RHEL-4 (base). After installing addtional packages, I ran up2date (over night) to install updates for all packages. Q: does that mean I'm now up to (or even above) the level of RHEL-4 update 4? Kind regards / met vriendelijke groet, Wim de Haan Ing. Wim de Haan Senior Digital Design Engineer Group: CMOS ICs Email: Wim.de.Haan at dalsa.com Phone: +31 40 27 24634 Fax: +31 40 27 44090 DALSA B.V. Address: HTC 12a (Building WAD) 5656 AE Eindhoven The Netherlands Postbox: M/S 01 High Tech Campus Visit our website: DALSA The information contained here is DALSA company confidential and intended only for the individuals to whom it is addressed. This message contains confidential information and shall not be exchanged between the addressed person and any other third party. Any review, transmission, dissemination or other use of this information is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. ********************************************************************** To help combat SPAM DALSA will no longer return delivery failure notifications for incorrect or invalid addresses. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This email message has also been swept for the presence of computer viruses Please note that DALSA employee addresses have been standardized to dalsa.com-- Please update your address book as may be required ********************************************************************** -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 3720 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rriley at procuri.com Thu Feb 15 20:15:29 2007 From: rriley at procuri.com (Richard Riley) Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:15:29 -0500 Subject: [rhn-users] up2date vs iso updates References: Message-ID: The ISOs are not kept up to date with the latest updates. That is the reason for running "up2date". However, the kernel updates are not downloaded by default. If you run "up2date -u" you will see at the end of the operation that some updates "usually only kernel" are excluded and you would need to run to use the -f (force) option to up2date to get them. Then you would need to reboot the machine to apply them. ________________________________ From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com on behalf of Wim.de.Haan at dalsa.com Sent: Thu 2/15/2007 4:11 AM To: rhn-users at redhat.com Subject: [rhn-users] up2date vs iso updates Hi, I'm new to Red Hat. I maintain a server with RHEL-4. I'm a bit confused on the RHEL4 ISOs which can be downloaded from RHN. The server came installed with RHEL-4 (base). After installing addtional packages, I ran up2date (over night) to install updates for all packages. Q: does that mean I'm now up to (or even above) the level of RHEL-4 update 4? Kind regards / met vriendelijke groet, Wim de Haan Ing. Wim de Haan Senior Digital Design Engineer Group: CMOS ICs Email: Wim.de.Haan at dalsa.com Phone: +31 40 27 24634 Fax: +31 40 27 44090 DALSA B.V. Address: HTC 12a (Building WAD) 5656 AE Eindhoven The Netherlands Postbox: M/S 01 High Tech Campus Visit our website: D ALSA The information contained here is DALSA company confidential and intended only for the individuals to whom it is addressed. This message contains confidential information and shall not be exchanged between the addressed person and any other third party. Any review, transmission, dissemination or other use of this information is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. ********************************************************************** To help combat SPAM DALSA will no longer return delivery failure notifications for incorrect or invalid addresses. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This email message has also been swept for the presence of computer viruses Please note that DALSA employee addresses have been standardized to dalsa.com-- Please update your address book as may be required ********************************************************************** -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: winmail.dat Type: application/ms-tnef Size: 10872 bytes Desc: not available URL: From michael.mansour at hp.com Thu Feb 15 22:32:07 2007 From: michael.mansour at hp.com (Mansour, Michael) Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 06:32:07 +0800 Subject: [rhn-users] up2date vs iso updates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <58727644D357E1429F7095BD0A29709404653171@sgpexc05.asiapacific.cpqcorp.net> Hi Wim, There's a couple of ISOs you can download from RHN. There's the ones you can install from and the ones that you can't (which can only be used to import to a Satellite server). For your second question, you can see what release you're running by using: # cat /etc/redhat-release Regards, Michael. ________________________________ From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Wim.de.Haan at dalsa.com Sent: Thursday, 15 February 2007 8:11 PM To: rhn-users at redhat.com Subject: [rhn-users] up2date vs iso updates Hi, I'm new to Red Hat. I maintain a server with RHEL-4. I'm a bit confused on the RHEL4 ISOs which can be downloaded from RHN. The server came installed with RHEL-4 (base). After installing addtional packages, I ran up2date (over night) to install updates for all packages. Q: does that mean I'm now up to (or even above) the level of RHEL-4 update 4? Kind regards / met vriendelijke groet, Wim de Haan Ing. Wim de Haan Senior Digital Design Engineer Group: CMOS ICs Email: Wim.de.Haan at dalsa.com Phone: +31 40 27 24634 Fax: +31 40 27 44090 DALSA B.V. Address: HTC 12a (Building WAD) 5656 AE Eindhoven The Netherlands Postbox: M/S 01 High Tech Campus Visit our website: D ALSA The information contained here is DALSA company confidential and intended only for the individuals to whom it is addressed. This message contains confidential information and shall not be exchanged between the addressed person and any other third party. Any review, transmission, dissemination or other use of this information is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. ********************************************************************** To help combat SPAM DALSA will no longer return delivery failure notifications for incorrect or invalid addresses. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This email message has also been swept for the presence of computer viruses Please note that DALSA employee addresses have been standardized to dalsa.com-- Please update your address book as may be required ********************************************************************** -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ATT3440909.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 3720 bytes Desc: ATT3440909.jpg URL: From abhijeetat at yahoo.com Sat Feb 17 21:44:30 2007 From: abhijeetat at yahoo.com (Abhi) Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 13:44:30 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rhn-users] boot erroe! (abhi) Message-ID: <20070217214430.90726.qmail@web55214.mail.re4.yahoo.com> Upon booting OS, erroring when attempting to load Shared libraries, I was able to log into server in single user mode, however before unmounting this directory that is erroring out --------------------------------- Looking for earth-friendly autos? Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fultonj at lafayette.edu Thu Feb 22 15:33:35 2007 From: fultonj at lafayette.edu (John Fulton) Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:33:35 -0500 Subject: [rhn-users] up2date broke up2date RHEL4 Message-ID: <45DDB7CF.2090106@lafayette.edu> up2date seems to be broken on one of my Nahant Update 4 servers. It was applying 8 updates yesterday and when it got to the kernel-smp-devel package the connection timed out. Now when I "up2date -u" I get package conflict errors and there seems to be data missing from the error message (pasted below). RHN claims that I need to apply security updates for php and xorg-x11 (RHSA-2007:0076 & 0003) but up2date complains that I already have them when I try to "up2date -i" them by name. An "up2date --undo" produced an AttributeError and I'll paste portions of /var/log/up2date below showing the packages that were updated including the error. I also tried "up2date -p" and "rpm --rebuilddb" which didn't seem to make any difference. Thanks, John # up2date -u Fetching Obsoletes list for channel: rhel-i386-es-4... Fetching rpm headers... ######################################## Name Version Rel ---------------------------------------------------------- php 4.3.9 3.22.3 i386 xorg-x11 6.8.2 1.EL.13.37.5 i386 xorg-x11-deprecated-libs 6.8.2 1.EL.13.37.5 i386 xorg-x11-devel 6.8.2 1.EL.13.37.5 i386 xorg-x11-libs 6.8.2 1.EL.13.37.5 i386 xorg-x11-xfs 6.8.2 1.EL.13.37.5 i386 Testing package set / solving RPM inter-dependencies... ######################################## RPM package conflict error. The message was: Test install failed because of package conflicts: The following packages were added to your selection to satisfy dependencies: Name Version Release -------------------------------------------------------------- php-ldap 4.3.9 3.22.3 php-pear 4.3.9 3.22.3 xorg-x11-deprecated-libs-devel 6.8.2 1.EL.13.37.5 package xorg-x11-deprecated-libs-devel-6.8.2-1.EL.13.37.5 is already installed package php-pear-4.3.9-3.22.3 is already installed package php-ldap-4.3.9-3.22.3 is already installed # ---- [Wed Feb 21 06:58:31 2007] up2date availablePackageList from network [Wed Feb 21 06:58:35 2007] up2date solving dep for: ['kernel-ib', 'kernel-ib', ' kernel-ib'] [Wed Feb 21 07:01:32 2007] up2date installing packages: ['bind-libs-9.2.4-24.EL4 ', 'bind-utils-9.2.4-24.EL4', 'dbus-0.22-12.EL.8', 'dbus-devel-0.22-12.EL.8', 'd bus-glib-0.22-12.EL.8', 'dbus-python-0.22-12.EL.8', 'dbus-x11-0.22-12.EL.8', 'fe tchmail-6.2.5-6.el4.5', 'firefox-1.5.0.9-0.1.el4', 'gnomemeeting-1.0.2-9', 'gnup g-1.2.6-8', 'gtk2-2.4.13-22', 'kernel-2.6.9-42.0.8.EL', 'kernel-devel-2.6.9-42.0 .8.EL', 'kernel-hugemem-devel-2.6.9-42.0.8.EL', 'kernel-smp-2.6.9-42.0.8.EL', 'k ernel-smp-devel-2.6.9-42.0.8.EL', 'libgsf-1.10.1-2', 'libibverbs-1.0.3-1', 'libm thca-1.0.2-1', 'libsdp-0.9.0-1', 'php-4.3.9-3.22.3', 'php-ldap-4.3.9-3.22.3', 'p hp-pear-4.3.9-3.22.3', 'postgresql-libs-7.4.16-1.RHEL4.1', 'samba-3.0.10-1.4E.11 ', 'samba-client-3.0.10-1.4E.11', 'samba-common-3.0.10-1.4E.11', 'seamonkey-nspr -1.0.7-0.1.el4', 'seamonkey-nss-1.0.7-0.1.el4', 'tar-1.14-12.RHEL4', 'tzdata-200 6m-3.el4', 'xorg-x11-6.8.2-1.EL.13.37.5', 'xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL-6.8.2-1.EL.13.37. 5', 'xorg-x11-Mesa-libGLU-6.8.2-1.EL.13.37.5', 'xorg-x11-deprecated-libs-6.8.2-1 .EL.13.37.5', 'xorg-x11-deprecated-libs-devel-6.8.2-1.EL.13.37.5', 'xorg-x11-dev el-6.8.2-1.EL.13.37.5', 'xorg-x11-font-utils-6.8.2-1.EL.13.37.5', 'xorg-x11-libs -6.8.2-1.EL.13.37.5', 'xorg-x11-tools-6.8.2-1.EL.13.37.5', 'xorg-x11-twm-6.8.2-1 .EL.13.37.5', 'xorg-x11-xauth-6.8.2-1.EL.13.37.5', 'xorg-x11-xdm-6.8.2-1.EL.13.3 7.5', 'xorg-x11-xfs-6.8.2-1.EL.13.37.5', 'kernel-ib-1.0-1'] [Wed Feb 21 09:39:35 2007] up2date Updating package profile [Wed Feb 21 10:48:46 2007] up2date updating login info [Wed Feb 21 10:48:46 2007] up2date logging into up2date server [Wed Feb 21 10:48:47 2007] up2date successfully retrieved authentication token f rom up2date server [Wed Feb 21 10:48:47 2007] up2date availablePackageList from network [Wed Feb 21 10:48:50 2007] up2date solving dep for: ['php', 'php', 'xorg-x11-dep recated-libs', 'xorg-x11-devel'] [Wed Feb 21 10:48:54 2007] up2date RPM package conflict error. ... The rest of the error is from the first pasting above. -- John Fulton, Linux Administrator, Lafayette College ITS 610-330-5650, Pardee Hall Room 11, Easton PA 18042-1775 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From alfred.hovdestad at usask.ca Fri Feb 23 04:20:32 2007 From: alfred.hovdestad at usask.ca (Alfred Hovdestad) Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 22:20:32 -0600 Subject: [rhn-users] up2date broke up2date RHEL4 In-Reply-To: <45DDB7CF.2090106@lafayette.edu> References: <45DDB7CF.2090106@lafayette.edu> Message-ID: <45DE6B90.8000806@usask.ca> On some older systems (RH8 and RH9), I occasionally had to delete the temporary files in /var/lib/rpm/ and rebuild the rpmdb database: rm -f /var/lib/rpm/__db* rpm --rebuilddb rpm -vv --rebuilddb /* if you want lots of output */ It's been a while since I have had to do this, but it might help (and it shouldn't hurt). Alfred Hovdestad John Fulton wrote: > up2date seems to be broken on one of my Nahant Update 4 servers. It was > applying 8 updates yesterday and when it got to the kernel-smp-devel > package the connection timed out. Now when I "up2date -u" I get package > conflict errors and there seems to be data missing from the error > message (pasted below). > > RHN claims that I need to apply security updates for php and xorg-x11 > (RHSA-2007:0076 & 0003) but up2date complains that I already have them > when I try to "up2date -i" them by name. An "up2date --undo" produced > an AttributeError and I'll paste portions of /var/log/up2date below > showing the packages that were updated including the error. I also > tried "up2date -p" and "rpm --rebuilddb" which didn't seem to make any > difference. > > Thanks, > John > From NFlorez at sdcwa.org Fri Feb 23 16:10:10 2007 From: NFlorez at sdcwa.org (Florez, Nestor) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:10:10 -0800 Subject: [rhn-users] RHEL 3 ES - update question .... Message-ID: <1CF7137E18C1234082F572E8A816DFAE0745F40F@Octopus.sdcwa.org> Guys, I have a RHEL 5 ES and I was wondering the following: Is it recommended to upgrade this packages? Do you know if it will mess up anything? ------------------------------------------------------------------- Critical: gnomemeeting security update ------------------------------------------------------- 2/20/07 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Important kernel security update Failed 10/19/06 kernel-utils enhancement update None 7/20/06 Important Updated kernel packages for Red Hat None 7/20/06 Enterprise Linux 3 Update 8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks, N?stor :-) From NFlorez at sdcwa.org Fri Feb 23 16:34:48 2007 From: NFlorez at sdcwa.org (Florez, Nestor) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:34:48 -0800 Subject: [rhn-users] RE: RHEL 3 ES - update question .... Message-ID: <1CF7137E18C1234082F572E8A816DFAE0745F410@Octopus.sdcwa.org> I meant RHEL3 not RHEL 5 :-) --------------------------------------------------- Guys, I have a RHEL 5 ES and I was wondering the following: Is it recommended to upgrade this packages? Do you know if it will mess up anything? ------------------------------------------------------------------- Critical: gnomemeeting security update ------------------------------------------------------- 2/20/07 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Important kernel security update Failed 10/19/06 kernel-utils enhancement update None 7/20/06 Important Updated kernel packages for Red Hat None 7/20/06 Enterprise Linux 3 Update 8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks, N?stor :-) From NFlorez at sdcwa.org Fri Feb 23 19:36:19 2007 From: NFlorez at sdcwa.org (Florez, Nestor) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:36:19 -0800 Subject: [rhn-users] RHEL 3 ES - update question .... Message-ID: <1CF7137E18C1234082F572E8A816DFAE0745F411@Octopus.sdcwa.org> Guys, I have a RHEL 3 ES and I was wondering the following: Is it recommended to upgrade this packages? Do you know if it will mess up anything? ------------------------------------------------------------------- Critical: gnomemeeting security update ------------------------------------------------------- 2/20/07 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Important kernel security update Failed 10/19/06 kernel-utils enhancement update None 7/20/06 Important Updated kernel packages for Red Hat None 7/20/06 Enterprise Linux 3 Update 8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks, N?stor :-) From Russell_Hopson at brown.edu Fri Feb 23 20:37:55 2007 From: Russell_Hopson at brown.edu (Hopson, Russell) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:37:55 -0500 Subject: [rhn-users] Set default global login to KDE Message-ID: Hi RHN Users, I have 5 RHEL AS 3 workstations with active subscriptions, all up2date. I am not versed in RHEL/Linux terminology and little of this knowledge is required for the application for which I use these workstations. That said, I am searching for a way to easily set the global login path to KDE (required by my application) without having to select the session for each user individually. Recently, when I performed an update it hijacked the default login for all 85+ users to gnome. The problem with this is that when you log using gnome you arrive a black screen with various boxes popped up with no text (a problem I spent considerable time trying to figure out long ago to no avail as I do not need to use gnome). The only solution is to ctrl/alt/bksp and come back out and change the session to KDE and save it but it is very annoying as it has happened on more than one occasion after an update. I can find nothing in the system settings that will allow me to do this. Thank you in advance for any help you can offer in this matter. Russ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From alfred.hovdestad at usask.ca Fri Feb 23 20:41:38 2007 From: alfred.hovdestad at usask.ca (Alfred Hovdestad) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:41:38 -0600 Subject: [rhn-users] Set default global login to KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <45DF5182.5090602@usask.ca> Hi. The really belongs in the Taroon list: Taroon-list Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon) https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list The answer is /etc/sysconfig/desktop Alfred Hovdestad Hopson, Russell wrote: > Hi RHN Users, > > > > I have 5 RHEL AS 3 workstations with active subscriptions, all up2date. > I am not versed in RHEL/Linux terminology and little of this knowledge > is required for the application for which I use these workstations. > > > > That said, I am searching for a way to easily set the global login path > to KDE (required by my application) without having to select the session > for each user individually. Recently, when I performed an update it > hijacked the default login for all 85+ users to gnome. The problem with > this is that when you log using gnome you arrive a black screen with > various boxes popped up with no text (a problem I spent considerable > time trying to figure out long ago to no avail as I do not need to use > gnome). The only solution is to ctrl/alt/bksp and come back out and > change the session to KDE and save it but it is very annoying as it has > happened on more than one occasion after an update. I can find nothing > in the system settings that will allow me to do this. > > > > Thank you in advance for any help you can offer in this matter. > > > > Russ > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > rhn-users mailing list > rhn-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users From wolfram at cyber-inc.us Mon Feb 26 00:52:54 2007 From: wolfram at cyber-inc.us (Wolfram R. Jarisch) Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 19:52:54 -0500 Subject: [rhn-users] update of firefox changes evolution startup Message-ID: <1172451174.12943.8.camel@ws530.localdomain> Dear All, I just upgraded to firefox 1.5.0.10 via up2date (running RHEL4, kernel 2.6.9-42.0.8). Since the up2date I cannot start evolution directly any more. I need to call evolution through firefox via "Tools" -> "Read Mail". When I try to start evolution e.g. from the Menu/icon it reports "Failed all methods for initializing NSS". How can I perform the update / correct the update so that I do not depend on firefox? Thanks for any advice Wolfram -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From abhijeetat at yahoo.com Mon Feb 26 16:42:52 2007 From: abhijeetat at yahoo.com (Abhi) Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 08:42:52 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rhn-users] Hyperthreading problem!! Message-ID: <20070226164252.28021.qmail@web55214.mail.re4.yahoo.com> Hello, Supermicro P8SCi Motherboard Intel Pentium 4 630 CPU (3.0 Ghz, 2 MB L2, Hyperthreading, 800 Mhz FSB) 1 GB DDRII 533 Mhz RAM Non-ECC Using RHEL 4 with 2.6.9-11.EL kernel when i run #cat /proc/cpuinfo it shows only 1 processor seems my Hyperthreading is not working,but its is enabled from BIOS. --------------------------------- Don't be flakey. Get Yahoo! Mail for Mobile and always stay connected to friends. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From james.a.sterling at boeing.com Mon Feb 26 16:51:46 2007 From: james.a.sterling at boeing.com (Sterling, James A) Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:51:46 -0500 Subject: [rhn-users] Hyperthreading problem!! In-Reply-To: <20070226164252.28021.qmail@web55214.mail.re4.yahoo.com> References: <20070226164252.28021.qmail@web55214.mail.re4.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <2D40BC237027834D92174FD129DDF71301406F79@XCH-NE-1V1.ne.nos.boeing.com> you need to run the smp kernel you may/should have more then one kernel in grub and you need to select the one with smp fedora xxxxxxxxxx fc5 fedora xxxxxxxxxx fc5smp << for hyperthreading Hope this helps Good Luck Jim James A. Sterling III Integrated Labs 610-591-6450 Voice 610-591-3456 Fax 610-319-1518 Pager pager email 6103191518 at arch.net ________________________________ From: Abhi [mailto:abhijeetat at yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 11:43 AM To: rhn; rhn Subject: [rhn-users] Hyperthreading problem!! Hello, Supermicro P8SCi Motherboard Intel Pentium 4 630 CPU (3.0 Ghz, 2 MB L2, Hyperthreading, 800 Mhz FSB) 1 GB DDRII 533 Mhz RAM Non-ECC Using RHEL 4 with 2.6.9-11.EL kernel when i run #cat /proc/cpuinfo it shows only 1 processor seems my Hyperthreading is not working,but its is enabled from BIOS. ________________________________ Don't be flakey. Get Yahoo! Mail for Mobile and always stay connected to friends. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jentrena at mailext.com Mon Feb 26 16:52:27 2007 From: jentrena at mailext.com (Entrena Perez, Julio [HP]) Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:52:27 +0100 Subject: [rhn-users] Hyperthreading problem!! In-Reply-To: <20070226164252.28021.qmail@web55214.mail.re4.yahoo.com> References: <20070226164252.28021.qmail@web55214.mail.re4.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <80FDDD0100BF5F42BF6391EAB5C8D36301694266@sbext231.mailext.com> Hi Abhi, This list is not intended for discussion about topics specific to Red Hat Enterprise Linux that do not involve Red Hat Network. For discussion of such topics, you may want to try: [1] RHEL 4 Discussion - https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/nahant-list [2] RHEL 3 Discussion - https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list [3] Red Hat System Administrators' list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list Also, you should be using the smp kernel. Try 'up2date kernel-smp' and reboot. Regards, Juli De: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] En nombre de Abhi Enviado el: lunes, 26 de febrero de 2007 17:43 Para: rhn; rhn Asunto: [rhn-users] Hyperthreading problem!! Hello, Supermicro P8SCi Motherboard Intel Pentium 4 630 CPU (3.0 Ghz, 2 MB L2, Hyperthreading, 800 Mhz FSB) 1 GB DDRII 533 Mhz RAM Non-ECC Using RHEL 4 with 2.6.9-11.EL kernel when i run #cat /proc/cpuinfo it shows only 1 processor seems my Hyperthreading is not working,but its is enabled from BIOS. ________________________________ Don't be flakey. Get Yahoo! Mail for Mobile and always stay connected to friends. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From NFlorez at sdcwa.org Mon Feb 26 19:58:58 2007 From: NFlorez at sdcwa.org (Florez, Nestor) Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:58:58 -0800 Subject: [rhn-users] Hyperthreading problem!! Message-ID: <1CF7137E18C1234082F572E8A816DFAE0745F41C@Octopus.sdcwa.org> Hi, This might be a dumb question, but just becasue you have hyperthreading, should the system show more than 1 cpu? Thanks, N?stor :-) -----Original Message----- From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com]On Behalf Of Entrena Perez, Julio [HP] Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 8:52 AM To: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) Subject: RE: [rhn-users] Hyperthreading problem!! Hi Abhi, This list is not intended for discussion about topics specific to Red Hat Enterprise Linux that do not involve Red Hat Network. For discussion of such topics, you may want to try: [1] RHEL 4 Discussion - https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/nahant-list [2] RHEL 3 Discussion - https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list [3] Red Hat System Administrators' list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list Also, you should be using the smp kernel. Try 'up2date kernel-smp' and reboot. Regards, Juli De: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] En nombre de Abhi Enviado el: lunes, 26 de febrero de 2007 17:43 Para: rhn; rhn Asunto: [rhn-users] Hyperthreading problem!! Hello, Supermicro P8SCi Motherboard Intel Pentium 4 630 CPU (3.0 Ghz, 2 MB L2, Hyperthreading, 800 Mhz FSB) 1 GB DDRII 533 Mhz RAM Non-ECC Using RHEL 4 with 2.6.9-11.EL kernel when i run #cat /proc/cpuinfo it shows only 1 processor seems my Hyperthreading is not working,but its is enabled from BIOS. _____ Don't be flakey. Get Yahoo! Mail for Mobile and always stay connected to friends. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tom at riverscomputers.com Mon Feb 26 20:01:12 2007 From: tom at riverscomputers.com (Tom Rivers) Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:01:12 -0500 Subject: [rhn-users] Hyperthreading problem!! In-Reply-To: <1CF7137E18C1234082F572E8A816DFAE0745F41C@Octopus.sdcwa.org> References: <1CF7137E18C1234082F572E8A816DFAE0745F41C@Octopus.sdcwa.org> Message-ID: <45E33C88.5080607@riverscomputers.com> Florez, Nestor wrote: > Hi, > > This might be a dumb question, but just becasue you have hyperthreading, > should the system show more than 1 cpu? > > Thanks, > > N?stor :-) For what it's worth, I have a system that uses hyperthreading (Fedora Core 5) and top shows two cpu's. Tom From jhon_jimenez at petroseis.com.co Mon Feb 26 20:12:22 2007 From: jhon_jimenez at petroseis.com.co (Jhon Jimenez) Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:12:22 -0500 Subject: [rhn-users] unsuscribe References: <1CF7137E18C1234082F572E8A816DFAE0745F41C@Octopus.sdcwa.org> Message-ID: <003101c759e2$6d682050$e900a8c0@petroseis11> ----- Original Message ----- From: Florez, Nestor To: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 2:58 PM Subject: RE: [rhn-users] Hyperthreading problem!! Hi, This might be a dumb question, but just becasue you have hyperthreading, should the system show more than 1 cpu? Thanks, N?stor :-) -----Original Message----- From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com]On Behalf Of Entrena Perez, Julio [HP] Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 8:52 AM To: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) Subject: RE: [rhn-users] Hyperthreading problem!! Hi Abhi, This list is not intended for discussion about topics specific to Red Hat Enterprise Linux that do not involve Red Hat Network. For discussion of such topics, you may want to try: [1] RHEL 4 Discussion - https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/nahant-list [2] RHEL 3 Discussion - https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list [3] Red Hat System Administrators' list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list Also, you should be using the smp kernel. Try 'up2date kernel-smp' and reboot. Regards, Juli De: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] En nombre de Abhi Enviado el: lunes, 26 de febrero de 2007 17:43 Para: rhn; rhn Asunto: [rhn-users] Hyperthreading problem!! Hello, Supermicro P8SCi Motherboard Intel Pentium 4 630 CPU (3.0 Ghz, 2 MB L2, Hyperthreading, 800 Mhz FSB) 1 GB DDRII 533 Mhz RAM Non-ECC Using RHEL 4 with 2.6.9-11.EL kernel when i run #cat /proc/cpuinfo it shows only 1 processor seems my Hyperthreading is not working,but its is enabled from BIOS. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Don't be flakey. Get Yahoo! Mail for Mobile and always stay connected to friends. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.412 / Virus Database: 268.18.4/702 - Release Date: 25/02/2007 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From NFlorez at sdcwa.org Mon Feb 26 20:18:46 2007 From: NFlorez at sdcwa.org (Florez, Nestor) Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:18:46 -0800 Subject: [rhn-users] Hyperthreading problem!! Message-ID: <1CF7137E18C1234082F572E8A816DFAE0745F41D@Octopus.sdcwa.org> Thanks!!! -----Original Message----- From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com]On Behalf Of Tom Rivers Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 12:01 PM To: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) Subject: Re: [rhn-users] Hyperthreading problem!! Florez, Nestor wrote: > Hi, > > This might be a dumb question, but just becasue you have hyperthreading, > should the system show more than 1 cpu? > > Thanks, > > N?stor :-) For what it's worth, I have a system that uses hyperthreading (Fedora Core 5) and top shows two cpu's. Tom _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users From pedro at rcpisos.com.br Tue Feb 27 13:12:34 2007 From: pedro at rcpisos.com.br (Pedro Drimel Neto) Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 10:12:34 -0300 Subject: [rhn-users] Update version of RHEL4 Message-ID: <20070227131123.M50398@rcpisos.com.br> Hello, I'd like to know the version of update from my redhat enterprise linux 4. I need know this to use ibm_a30raid on xSeries 236. http://www-304.ibm.com/jct01004c/systems/support/supportsite.wss/docdisplay?lndocid=MIGR-64400&brandind=5000008 Thank you. -- Regards. From jentrena at mailext.com Tue Feb 27 15:21:04 2007 From: jentrena at mailext.com (Entrena Perez, Julio [HP]) Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:21:04 +0100 Subject: [rhn-users] Update version of RHEL4 In-Reply-To: <20070227131123.M50398@rcpisos.com.br> References: <20070227131123.M50398@rcpisos.com.br> Message-ID: <80FDDD0100BF5F42BF6391EAB5C8D363016942EB@sbext231.mailext.com> Hi Pedro, cat /etc/redhat-release Regards, Juli -----Mensaje original----- De: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] En nombre de Pedro Drimel Neto Enviado el: martes, 27 de febrero de 2007 14:13 Para: rhn-users at redhat.com Asunto: [rhn-users] Update version of RHEL4 Hello, I'd like to know the version of update from my redhat enterprise linux 4. I need know this to use ibm_a30raid on xSeries 236. http://www-304.ibm.com/jct01004c/systems/support/supportsite.wss/docdisp lay?lndocid=MIGR-64400&brandind=5000008 Thank you. -- Regards. _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users From Georgi.Hristov at fnf.com Tue Feb 27 16:22:59 2007 From: Georgi.Hristov at fnf.com (Hristov, Georgi) Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 10:22:59 -0600 Subject: [rhn-users] RHEL 3 ES - update question .... References: <1CF7137E18C1234082F572E8A816DFAE0745F411@Octopus.sdcwa.org> Message-ID: <516344A6E2701944A42A65F698D84B4502711126@CMBFISLR02.FNFIS.COM> We have been running RHES 3.8 for a while now and all seems to be working fine for us. -----Original Message----- From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Florez, Nestor Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 1:36 PM To: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) Subject: RE: [rhn-users] RHEL 3 ES - update question .... Guys, I have a RHEL 3 ES and I was wondering the following: Is it recommended to upgrade this packages? Do you know if it will mess up anything? ------------------------------------------------------------------- Critical: gnomemeeting security update ------------------------------------------------------- 2/20/07 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Important kernel security update Failed 10/19/06 kernel-utils enhancement update None 7/20/06 Important Updated kernel packages for Red Hat None 7/20/06 Enterprise Linux 3 Update 8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks, N?stor :-) _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users From abhijeetat at yahoo.com Tue Feb 27 20:56:41 2007 From: abhijeetat at yahoo.com (Abhi) Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:56:41 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rhn-users] Blocking messenger using squid Message-ID: <702965.13300.qm@web55202.mail.re4.yahoo.com> hi, I m using RHEL4 and running squid proxy server on it. Q. How to block messengers(googletalk,ymessenger) from squid? --------------------------------- Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From wolfram at cyber-inc.us Wed Feb 28 03:12:46 2007 From: wolfram at cyber-inc.us (Wolfram R. Jarisch) Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 22:12:46 -0500 Subject: [rhn-users] update of firefox changes evolution startup In-Reply-To: <1172451174.12943.8.camel@ws530.localdomain> References: <1172451174.12943.8.camel@ws530.localdomain> Message-ID: <1172632366.6275.3.camel@ws530.localdomain> Dear All, Did another upgrade with up2date to the next kernel 2.6.9-42.0.10.EL and have evolution start again w/o going through firefox. Is there an explanation of what might have been broken? Thanks for any suggestions. Wolfram ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 19:52 -0500, Wolfram R. Jarisch wrote: > Dear All, > > I just upgraded to firefox 1.5.0.10 via up2date (running RHEL4, kernel > 2.6.9-42.0.8). Since the up2date I cannot start evolution directly any > more. I need to call evolution through firefox via "Tools" -> "Read > Mail". > > When I try to start evolution e.g. from the Menu/icon it reports > "Failed all methods for initializing NSS". How can I perform the > update / correct the update so that I do not depend on firefox? > > Thanks for any advice > Wolfram > > _______________________________________________ > rhn-users mailing list > rhn-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rfriedma at redhat.com Wed Feb 28 20:28:11 2007 From: rfriedma at redhat.com (Richard Friedman) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:28:11 -0500 Subject: [rhn-users] Red Hat Network Satellite 4.2.0 Notice Message-ID: <1172694491.9470.82.camel@localhost.localdomain> RHN Satellite Customers, We wanted to make available some notes about the upcoming Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.0 (official date not announced yet) and RHN Satellite 4.2 releases (available now). With Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.0, we are moving to yum as the standard client by which to communicate with the Red Hat Network Satellite. The yum on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.0 will be packaged with a plug-in to achieve this capability. We have also made changes in the rhn_register command to support changes in the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.0 registration process. As a result of these changes, only Red Hat Network Satellite 4.2, Proxy 4.2 and beyond will be compatible with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.0. Any customer using the new OS in their environment in combination with Red Hat Network Satellite will need to upgrade to version 4.2 or newer. From alfred.hovdestad at usask.ca Wed Feb 28 22:44:47 2007 From: alfred.hovdestad at usask.ca (Alfred Hovdestad) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:44:47 -0600 Subject: [rhn-users] Red Hat Network Satellite 4.2.0 Notice In-Reply-To: <1172694491.9470.82.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1172694491.9470.82.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <45E605DF.1080200@usask.ca> Thanks Richard. Where do we find information on upgrading our RHN Proxy server? We are currently running RHN Proxy 4.0. $ rpm -qa | grep -i proxy rhns-proxy-docs-4.0.6-11.rhel4 rhns-proxy-redirect-4.0.6-11.rhel4 rhns-proxy-management-4.0.6-11.rhel4 rhns-proxy-tools-4.0.6-11.rhel4 rhns-proxy-broker-4.0.6-11.rhel4 rhns-proxy-package-manager-4.0.6-11.rhel4 Alfred Hovdestad, RHCE University of Saskatchewan Richard Friedman wrote: > RHN Satellite Customers, > > We wanted to make available some notes about the upcoming Red Hat > Enterprise Linux 5.0 (official date not announced yet) and RHN Satellite > 4.2 releases (available now). With Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.0, we are > moving to yum as the standard client by which to communicate with the > Red Hat Network Satellite. The yum on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.0 will > be packaged with a plug-in to achieve this capability. We have also made > changes in the rhn_register command to support changes in the Red Hat > Enterprise Linux 5.0 registration process. > > As a result of these changes, only Red Hat Network Satellite 4.2, Proxy > 4.2 and beyond will be compatible with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.0. > Any customer using the new OS in their environment in combination with > Red Hat Network Satellite will need to upgrade to version 4.2 or newer. > > _______________________________________________ > rhn-users mailing list > rhn-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users