[rhn-users] RE: rhn-users Digest, Vol 36, Issue 5

[Steven Jones]

Yes....

regards

Steven Jones
Senior  Linux/Unix/San System Administrator
APG -Technology Integration Team
Victoria University of Wellington
Phone: +64 4 463 6272 Mobile: +64 27 563 6272 

 


-----Original Message-----
From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com]
On Behalf Of inode0
Sent: Thursday, 8 February 2007 10:20 a.m.
To: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)
Subject: Re: [rhn-users] RE: rhn-users Digest, Vol 36, Issue 5

On 2/7/07, Steven Jones <Steven.Jones at vuw.ac.nz> wrote:
> I have a mailman rpm with a bug fixed by mailman in 2005, yet it is
not
> in the rhas3 yet.....indeed support tells me it may never be put in so
I
> have to patch it from the mailman tree....kinda blows away the reason
> for getting rhas in the first place when I start to roll my own
> solutions...........

Security fixes and other bug fixes are naturally treated differently.
Is your mailman issue something that leaves your system or service
vulnerable to attack?

RHEL3 is in deployment support now so I would think Red Hat would
still fix bugs that aren't security related unless they are of very
little consequence.

John

_______________________________________________
rhn-users mailing list
rhn-users at redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users