From ronanian at annamaria.edu Wed Apr 1 12:34:06 2009 From: ronanian at annamaria.edu (Richard Onanian) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 08:34:06 -0400 Subject: [rhn-users] RE: Can't subscribe RHEL5 to Base Software Channel In-Reply-To: <983C144328E1A843AD3FD9F2EDDD19DF2ACFC62056@AMCEXCHANGE.AMCRF.LOCAL> References: <983C144328E1A843AD3FD9F2EDDD19DF2ACFC62056@AMCEXCHANGE.AMCRF.LOCAL> Message-ID: <983C144328E1A843AD3FD9F2EDDD19DF4D8F29349B@AMCEXCHANGE.AMCRF.LOCAL> Bump. Can anyone help? -----Original Message----- From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Richard Onanian Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 10:14 AM To: 'rhn-users at redhat.com' Subject: [rhn-users] Can't subscribe RHEL5 to Base Software Channel I have two RHEL5 systems and a bunch of RHEL4/RHEL3 systems. The older systems are all subscribed to their appropriate Base Software Channel, but I can't get the RHEL5 systems subscribed. I am pretty sure that I have available entitlements and subscriptions and such. When I go to the Software Channels page at https://rhn.redhat.com/rhn/systems/details/SystemChannels.do?sid= (SID deleted) it says "None - disable this service" for the current Base Channel. I can choose the correct Base Channel ("Red Hat Enterprise Linux (v. 5 for 32-bit x86)") from the drop-down list, but when I submit my choice by clicking the "Modify Base Channel" button, it reloads the same page showing "None - disable this service" again, and the system remains not subscribed to a Base Channel. A picture of the page, list, and button I'm talking about: http://s5.tinypic.com/2chru3m.jpg Choosing the base channel selected in that picture and clicking the "Modify Base Channel" just reloads the page with no action having been taken. What am I doing wrong? _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users From miquel.basart at udg.edu Tue Apr 21 16:03:07 2009 From: miquel.basart at udg.edu (Miquel Basart) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:03:07 +0200 Subject: [rhn-users] RHN -- Reboot Systems Message-ID: <49EDEE3B.3030304@udg.edu> Hi, we have a problems with opcion "Reboot Systems" in "System Set Manager" tag "Misc" If We have selected some systems and go to "System Set Manager" --> "Misc" --> "Reboot Systems" and then show thoe following messages: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Confirm System Reboots Below is a list of the systems that can be rebooted using Red Hat Network. Select the systems you wish to reboot and click the button below. No systems. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- If we selected any options in "Misc". For exemple: "Lock system Profiles" the rhn show the selected system. What happens? Miquel Basart From Joe_Wulf at yahoo.com Thu Apr 23 03:55:45 2009 From: Joe_Wulf at yahoo.com (Joe_Wulf) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:55:45 -0400 Subject: [rhn-users] RHN Website Questions Message-ID: Hello, I'm a user of my company's access to the RHN website. I'm a new subscriber to this list, as it seemed the most appropriate one. I've looked over the past 2 years of messages, sorted by date and did not find anything regarding my questions, or their answers. Further, I've studied the RHN documentation (rhn.redhat.com/ rhn/help/reference/rhn500) without much success either towards better answering my questions. Should there be a better place for me to address my questions, please direct me. Thank you. What resource can I leverage to become aware of changes to the web page content of the RHN web pages without having to manually walk through each web page and cross-reference with our directory/file structure? I've access to our local master replicated copy of the ISO's from RHN for which we are entitled to. Our work with them is within a private isolated LAN. The challenge is keeping up with not just the new OS releases (we can anticipate those due to the publicity) but also all the other elements. It seems the five entries for MRG (under RHEL5 x32 and x64 bit) are total duplicates of each other, down to the MD5 sums. If they are all, literally, the same, why not simply have one comprehensive entry? I do have other questions, some more detailed, but I'll hold off for now to see if I'm in the right place. Thank you. R, -Joe Wulf, CISSP, VCP, USN(RET) Senior IA Engineer ProSync Technology Group, LLC www.prosync.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: