From mtoporek at crediamigo.com.mx Mon Mar 2 18:59:31 2009 From: mtoporek at crediamigo.com.mx (Moises Toporek) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 12:59:31 -0600 Subject: [rhn-users] Connection abuse Message-ID: <006501c99b69$05346140$0f9d23c0$@com.mx> Hi: I am new with RH and I was trying to install MySQL using yum and got an error that said that RHN has detected an abuse of service from my system. I don?t know what is this. Any help would be appreciate it. Mois?s Toporek Hop -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pmutha at redhat.com Tue Mar 3 04:40:32 2009 From: pmutha at redhat.com (Paresh Mutha) Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 10:10:32 +0530 Subject: [rhn-users] Connection abuse In-Reply-To: <006501c99b69$05346140$0f9d23c0$@com.mx> References: <006501c99b69$05346140$0f9d23c0$@com.mx> Message-ID: <49ACB4C0.9080502@redhat.com> This occurs when a machine has been flagged as connecting to Red Hat Network (RHN) more frequently than 100 times per day after the first 1500 check-ins since the system was first registered with Red Hat Network. For more details on the same as well as solution you can go through - http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/docs/DOC-8166 Regards, Paresh Moises Toporek wrote: > > Hi: > > > > I am new with RH and I was trying to install MySQL using yum and got > an error that said that RHN has detected an abuse of service from my > system. I don?t know what is this. Any help would be appreciate it. > > > > *Mois?s Toporek Hop* > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > rhn-users mailing list > rhn-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users From cbarnard at rush.edu Mon Mar 9 15:26:48 2009 From: cbarnard at rush.edu (Christopher L. Barnard) Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 10:26:48 -0500 Subject: [rhn-users] Why do all of the files in /etc get changed every once in a while? Message-ID: <1236612408.17026.119.camel@cbar-linux.rush.edu> I am rolling Tripwire out to our linux RH boxes (3, 4, and 5) now that all of the Sun Solaris servers are done. Several times now on a monday morning Tripwire reports that every file in /etc has changed on a couple of the servers. Its always the timestamp. It is always a change to the same date and time for every file in /etc. This has happened on RH3, RH4, and RH5 servers. It only happens on a few each week. Why would this be happening? -- Christopher Barnard -------------------------------------------------------------------------- comment your code as if the maintainer will be a homicidal maniac who knows where you live. From scott.fletcher at bbsrc.ac.uk Mon Mar 9 15:31:28 2009 From: scott.fletcher at bbsrc.ac.uk (scott fletcher (BITS)) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 15:31:28 -0000 Subject: [rhn-users] Why do all of the files in /etc get changed every oncein a while? In-Reply-To: <1236612408.17026.119.camel@cbar-linux.rush.edu> References: <1236612408.17026.119.camel@cbar-linux.rush.edu> Message-ID: <4055B9A7D5796B4AA2FC4EE430C9504E034075D9@bitse2ksrv1.bits.bbsrc.ac.uk> I have only seen 2 reasons for this happening. 1. system updates 2. backup software (full backups) Any chance the times match with either of these ? Scott -----Original Message----- From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Christopher L. Barnard Sent: 09 March 2009 15:27 To: rhn-users at redhat.com Subject: [rhn-users] Why do all of the files in /etc get changed every oncein a while? I am rolling Tripwire out to our linux RH boxes (3, 4, and 5) now that all of the Sun Solaris servers are done. Several times now on a monday morning Tripwire reports that every file in /etc has changed on a couple of the servers. Its always the timestamp. It is always a change to the same date and time for every file in /etc. This has happened on RH3, RH4, and RH5 servers. It only happens on a few each week. Why would this be happening? -- Christopher Barnard ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- comment your code as if the maintainer will be a homicidal maniac who knows where you live. _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users -- Disclaimer: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient(s) to whom they are addressed. If you have received it in error, please destroy all copies and inform the sender. This email and any attachments are believed to be free from viruses but BBSRC accepts no liability in connection therewith. From mtoporek at crediamigo.com.mx Mon Mar 9 18:56:25 2009 From: mtoporek at crediamigo.com.mx (Moises Toporek) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 12:56:25 -0600 Subject: [rhn-users] commands takes to long to answer Message-ID: <008d01c9a0e8$bf57f800$3e07e800$@com.mx> Whenever I issue a command, it takes to long to answer or prompt me again. Why? Mois?s Toporek Hop Gerente de Sistemas Crediamigo ____________________________________________________________________________ Bosque de Ciruelos 160 piso 3 Col. Bosques de las Lomas, C.P. 11700, M?xico, D.F. Tel. (52-55) 5950-2370 Ext. 301 www.crediamigo.com.mx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From cbarnard at rush.edu Mon Mar 9 21:27:43 2009 From: cbarnard at rush.edu (Christopher L. Barnard) Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:27:43 -0500 Subject: [rhn-users] Why do all of the files in /etc get changed every oncein a while? In-Reply-To: <4055B9A7D5796B4AA2FC4EE430C9504E034075D9@bitse2ksrv1.bits.bbsrc.ac.uk> References: <1236612408.17026.119.camel@cbar-linux.rush.edu> <4055B9A7D5796B4AA2FC4EE430C9504E034075D9@bitse2ksrv1.bits.bbsrc.ac.uk> Message-ID: <1236634063.17026.156.camel@cbar-linux.rush.edu> No system updates have been done, but full backups correspond to the tripwire reports. But why would full backups change the timestamp of all of the files in /etc but not alter any others? Christopher On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 15:31 +0000, scott fletcher (BITS) wrote: > I have only seen 2 reasons for this happening. > > 1. system updates > 2. backup software (full backups) > > Any chance the times match with either of these ? > > Scott > > -----Original Message----- > From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] > On Behalf Of Christopher L. Barnard > Sent: 09 March 2009 15:27 > To: rhn-users at redhat.com > Subject: [rhn-users] Why do all of the files in /etc get changed every > oncein a while? > > I am rolling Tripwire out to our linux RH boxes (3, 4, and 5) now that > all of the Sun Solaris servers are done. Several times now on a monday > morning Tripwire reports that every file in /etc has changed on a couple > of the servers. Its always the timestamp. It is always a change to the > same date and time for every file in /etc. This has happened on RH3, > RH4, and RH5 servers. It only happens on a few each week. Why would > this be happening? > > -- > Christopher Barnard > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > -- > comment your code as if the maintainer will be a homicidal maniac who > knows where you live. > > _______________________________________________ > rhn-users mailing list > rhn-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users > From cs at zip.com.au Mon Mar 9 23:40:32 2009 From: cs at zip.com.au (Cameron Simpson) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:40:32 +1100 Subject: [rhn-users] Re: Why do all of the files in /etc get changed every oncein a while? In-Reply-To: <1236634063.17026.156.camel@cbar-linux.rush.edu> Message-ID: <20090309234032.GA7162@cskk.homeip.net> On 09Mar2009 16:27, Christopher L. Barnard wrote: | No system updates have been done, but full backups correspond to the | tripwire reports. But why would full backups change the timestamp of | all of the files in /etc but not alter any others? Is it modification time (mtime) or the access time (atime) or the change-to-inode time (ctime)? If it is the mtime, something is odd. The others might easily be changed by backup or integrity software (eg tripwire itself). Do your backups only back up specific parts of the filesystem? Likewise tripwire? -- Cameron Simpson DoD#743 http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/ It is not true that life is one damn thing after another -- it's one damn thing over and over. - Edna St. Vincent Millay From cs at zip.com.au Tue Mar 10 00:51:53 2009 From: cs at zip.com.au (Cameron Simpson) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:51:53 +1100 Subject: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer In-Reply-To: <008d01c9a0e8$bf57f800$3e07e800$@com.mx> Message-ID: <20090310005153.GA19610@cskk.homeip.net> On 09Mar2009 12:56, Moises Toporek wrote: | Whenever I issue a command, it takes to long to answer or prompt me again. | Why? Maybe the shell is checking the $MAIL file, and NFS is involved? You may need to tell us more about you system. And how long is long? Time it. Is it always the same length? -- Cameron Simpson DoD#743 http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/ When was the last time a jet was sucked into a bird engine intake? And I certainly don't recall ever having a jet bounce off the windshield of my car. - bobb at vice.ico.tek.com (Bob Beauchaine) From abliss at brockport.edu Tue Mar 10 01:05:16 2009 From: abliss at brockport.edu (Aaron Bliss) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 21:05:16 -0400 Subject: [rhn-users] Re: Why do all of the files in /etc get changed every oncein a while? In-Reply-To: <20090309234032.GA7162@cskk.homeip.net> References: <1236634063.17026.156.camel@cbar-linux.rush.edu> <20090309234032.GA7162@cskk.homeip.net> Message-ID: <000301c9a11c$466b6790$d34236b0$@edu> Definitely sounds odd...we use Netbackup for backups and ossec for, among other things, to ensure file system integrity and have not observed what you are seeing... Aaron -----Original Message----- From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Cameron Simpson Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 7:41 PM To: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) Subject: [rhn-users] Re: Why do all of the files in /etc get changed every oncein a while? On 09Mar2009 16:27, Christopher L. Barnard wrote: | No system updates have been done, but full backups correspond to the | tripwire reports. But why would full backups change the timestamp of | all of the files in /etc but not alter any others? Is it modification time (mtime) or the access time (atime) or the change-to-inode time (ctime)? If it is the mtime, something is odd. The others might easily be changed by backup or integrity software (eg tripwire itself). Do your backups only back up specific parts of the filesystem? Likewise tripwire? -- Cameron Simpson DoD#743 http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/ It is not true that life is one damn thing after another -- it's one damn thing over and over. - Edna St. Vincent Millay _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users From mtoporek at crediamigo.com.mx Tue Mar 10 01:06:03 2009 From: mtoporek at crediamigo.com.mx (Moises Toporek) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 19:06:03 -0600 Subject: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer In-Reply-To: <20090310005153.GA19610@cskk.homeip.net> References: <008d01c9a0e8$bf57f800$3e07e800$@com.mx> <20090310005153.GA19610@cskk.homeip.net> Message-ID: <010101c9a11c$62952eb0$27bf8c10$@com.mx> Sorry I am new to linux. Well long is about 5 minutes, whenever I issue a useradd command or whenever I login with any user other than root. My system is a RHEL 5 -----Mensaje original----- De: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] En nombre de Cameron Simpson Enviado el: Lunes, 09 de Marzo de 2009 06:52 p.m. Para: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) Asunto: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer On 09Mar2009 12:56, Moises Toporek wrote: | Whenever I issue a command, it takes to long to answer or prompt me again. | Why? Maybe the shell is checking the $MAIL file, and NFS is involved? You may need to tell us more about you system. And how long is long? Time it. Is it always the same length? -- Cameron Simpson DoD#743 http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/ When was the last time a jet was sucked into a bird engine intake? And I certainly don't recall ever having a jet bounce off the windshield of my car. - bobb at vice.ico.tek.com (Bob Beauchaine) _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users __________ Informacisn de NOD32, revisisn 3922 (20090309) __________ Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system http://www.nod32.com From scott.fletcher at bbsrc.ac.uk Tue Mar 10 09:12:23 2009 From: scott.fletcher at bbsrc.ac.uk (scott fletcher (BITS)) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:12:23 -0000 Subject: [rhn-users] Re: Why do all of the files in /etc get changedevery oncein a while? In-Reply-To: <000301c9a11c$466b6790$d34236b0$@edu> References: <1236634063.17026.156.camel@cbar-linux.rush.edu><20090309234032.GA7162@cskk.homeip.net> <000301c9a11c$466b6790$d34236b0$@edu> Message-ID: <4055B9A7D5796B4AA2FC4EE430C9504E034075DA@bitse2ksrv1.bits.bbsrc.ac.uk> I would use the stat command on a file in /etc/ and another in somewhere like bin and see if the timestamps match ie stat That way you can see if the backup is effecting all files and tripwire is only taking notice of some , I think some software uses the change timestamp to amrk when the last full backup was done. -----Original Message----- From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Aaron Bliss Sent: 10 March 2009 01:05 To: 'Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)' Subject: RE: [rhn-users] Re: Why do all of the files in /etc get changedevery oncein a while? Definitely sounds odd...we use Netbackup for backups and ossec for, among other things, to ensure file system integrity and have not observed what you are seeing... Aaron -----Original Message----- From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Cameron Simpson Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 7:41 PM To: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) Subject: [rhn-users] Re: Why do all of the files in /etc get changed every oncein a while? On 09Mar2009 16:27, Christopher L. Barnard wrote: | No system updates have been done, but full backups correspond to the | tripwire reports. But why would full backups change the timestamp of | all of the files in /etc but not alter any others? Is it modification time (mtime) or the access time (atime) or the change-to-inode time (ctime)? If it is the mtime, something is odd. The others might easily be changed by backup or integrity software (eg tripwire itself). Do your backups only back up specific parts of the filesystem? Likewise tripwire? -- Cameron Simpson DoD#743 http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/ It is not true that life is one damn thing after another -- it's one damn thing over and over. - Edna St. Vincent Millay _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users -- Disclaimer: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient(s) to whom they are addressed. If you have received it in error, please destroy all copies and inform the sender. This email and any attachments are believed to be free from viruses but BBSRC accepts no liability in connection therewith. From abliss at brockport.edu Tue Mar 10 12:48:55 2009 From: abliss at brockport.edu (Aaron Bliss) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:48:55 -0400 Subject: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer In-Reply-To: <010101c9a11c$62952eb0$27bf8c10$@com.mx> References: <008d01c9a0e8$bf57f800$3e07e800$@com.mx> <20090310005153.GA19610@cskk.homeip.net> <010101c9a11c$62952eb0$27bf8c10$@com.mx> Message-ID: <001e01c9a17e$92bef870$b83ce950$@edu> I've seen this happen when there are dns resolution problems. You may want to verify that /etc/resolv.conf is setup correctly and that you are not having any issues with your dns servers. Aaron -----Original Message----- From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Moises Toporek Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 9:06 PM To: 'Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)' Subject: RE: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer Sorry I am new to linux. Well long is about 5 minutes, whenever I issue a useradd command or whenever I login with any user other than root. My system is a RHEL 5 -----Mensaje original----- De: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] En nombre de Cameron Simpson Enviado el: Lunes, 09 de Marzo de 2009 06:52 p.m. Para: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) Asunto: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer On 09Mar2009 12:56, Moises Toporek wrote: | Whenever I issue a command, it takes to long to answer or prompt me again. | Why? Maybe the shell is checking the $MAIL file, and NFS is involved? You may need to tell us more about you system. And how long is long? Time it. Is it always the same length? -- Cameron Simpson DoD#743 http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/ When was the last time a jet was sucked into a bird engine intake? And I certainly don't recall ever having a jet bounce off the windshield of my car. - bobb at vice.ico.tek.com (Bob Beauchaine) _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users __________ Informacisn de NOD32, revisisn 3922 (20090309) __________ Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system http://www.nod32.com _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users From mtoporek at crediamigo.com.mx Tue Mar 10 15:26:11 2009 From: mtoporek at crediamigo.com.mx (Moises Toporek) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:26:11 -0600 Subject: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer In-Reply-To: <001e01c9a17e$92bef870$b83ce950$@edu> References: <008d01c9a0e8$bf57f800$3e07e800$@com.mx> <20090310005153.GA19610@cskk.homeip.net> <010101c9a11c$62952eb0$27bf8c10$@com.mx> <001e01c9a17e$92bef870$b83ce950$@edu> Message-ID: <001601c9a194$8dd0e880$a972b980$@com.mx> OK. But what should be in this file. I just have 2 lines search .... and nameserver .... Regards, Mois?s Toporek Hop ____________________________________________________________________________ Crediamigo -----Mensaje original----- De: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] En nombre de Aaron Bliss Enviado el: Martes, 10 de Marzo de 2009 06:49 a.m. Para: 'Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)' Asunto: RE: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer I've seen this happen when there are dns resolution problems. You may want to verify that /etc/resolv.conf is setup correctly and that you are not having any issues with your dns servers. Aaron -----Original Message----- From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Moises Toporek Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 9:06 PM To: 'Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)' Subject: RE: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer Sorry I am new to linux. Well long is about 5 minutes, whenever I issue a useradd command or whenever I login with any user other than root. My system is a RHEL 5 -----Mensaje original----- De: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] En nombre de Cameron Simpson Enviado el: Lunes, 09 de Marzo de 2009 06:52 p.m. Para: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) Asunto: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer On 09Mar2009 12:56, Moises Toporek wrote: | Whenever I issue a command, it takes to long to answer or prompt me again. | Why? Maybe the shell is checking the $MAIL file, and NFS is involved? You may need to tell us more about you system. And how long is long? Time it. Is it always the same length? -- Cameron Simpson DoD#743 http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/ When was the last time a jet was sucked into a bird engine intake? And I certainly don't recall ever having a jet bounce off the windshield of my car. - bobb at vice.ico.tek.com (Bob Beauchaine) _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users __________ Informacisn de NOD32, revisisn 3922 (20090309) __________ Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system http://www.nod32.com _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users __________ Informacisn de NOD32, revisisn 3922 (20090309) __________ Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system http://www.nod32.com From jpilldev at gmail.com Tue Mar 10 16:00:34 2009 From: jpilldev at gmail.com (J Pill) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:00:34 -0500 Subject: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer In-Reply-To: <001601c9a194$8dd0e880$a972b980$@com.mx> References: <008d01c9a0e8$bf57f800$3e07e800$@com.mx> <20090310005153.GA19610@cskk.homeip.net> <010101c9a11c$62952eb0$27bf8c10$@com.mx> <001e01c9a17e$92bef870$b83ce950$@edu> <001601c9a194$8dd0e880$a972b980$@com.mx> Message-ID: Are in this file private IPs? Can you put here public DNS? On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Moises Toporek wrote: > OK. But what should be in this file. I just have 2 lines search .... and > nameserver .... > Regards, > > Mois?s Toporek Hop > > ____________________________________________________________________________ > Crediamigo > > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] En > nombre de Aaron Bliss > Enviado el: Martes, 10 de Marzo de 2009 06:49 a.m. > Para: 'Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)' > Asunto: RE: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer > > I've seen this happen when there are dns resolution problems. You may want > to verify that /etc/resolv.conf is setup correctly and that you are not > having any issues with your dns servers. > > Aaron > > -----Original Message----- > From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] > On > Behalf Of Moises Toporek > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 9:06 PM > To: 'Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)' > Subject: RE: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer > > Sorry I am new to linux. > > Well long is about 5 minutes, whenever I issue a useradd command or > whenever > I login with any user other than root. > > My system is a RHEL 5 > > > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] En > nombre de Cameron Simpson > Enviado el: Lunes, 09 de Marzo de 2009 06:52 p.m. > Para: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) > Asunto: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer > > On 09Mar2009 12:56, Moises Toporek wrote: > | Whenever I issue a command, it takes to long to answer or prompt me > again. > | Why? > > Maybe the shell is checking the $MAIL file, and NFS is involved? > You may need to tell us more about you system. > And how long is long? Time it. Is it always the same length? > -- > Cameron Simpson DoD#743 > http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/ > > When was the last time a jet was sucked into a bird engine intake? And I > certainly don't recall ever having a jet bounce off the windshield of my > car. > - bobb at vice.ico.tek.com (Bob Beauchaine) > > _______________________________________________ > rhn-users mailing list > rhn-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users > > __________ Informacisn de NOD32, revisisn 3922 (20090309) __________ > > Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system > http://www.nod32.com > > > _______________________________________________ > rhn-users mailing list > rhn-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users > > _______________________________________________ > rhn-users mailing list > rhn-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users > > __________ Informacisn de NOD32, revisisn 3922 (20090309) __________ > > Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system > http://www.nod32.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > rhn-users mailing list > rhn-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mtoporek at crediamigo.com.mx Tue Mar 10 16:34:39 2009 From: mtoporek at crediamigo.com.mx (Moises Toporek) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:34:39 -0600 Subject: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer In-Reply-To: References: <008d01c9a0e8$bf57f800$3e07e800$@com.mx> <20090310005153.GA19610@cskk.homeip.net> <010101c9a11c$62952eb0$27bf8c10$@com.mx> <001e01c9a17e$92bef870$b83ce950$@edu> <001601c9a194$8dd0e880$a972b980$@com.mx> Message-ID: <003a01c9a19e$1bd776e0$538664a0$@com.mx> Really don?t know. A recomendation from a firend who knows more about linux I did a: Yum ?y install bind bind-chroot bind-utils bind-libs caching-nameserver to implement the dns. And change de resolv.conf file with IP 127.0.0.1 Regards, Mois?s Toporek Hop ____________________________________________________________________________ Crediamigo De: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] En nombre de J Pill Enviado el: Martes, 10 de Marzo de 2009 10:01 a.m. Para: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) Asunto: Re: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer Are in this file private IPs? Can you put here public DNS? On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Moises Toporek wrote: OK. But what should be in this file. I just have 2 lines search .... and nameserver .... Regards, Mois?s Toporek Hop ____________________________________________________________________________ Crediamigo -----Mensaje original----- De: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] En nombre de Aaron Bliss Enviado el: Martes, 10 de Marzo de 2009 06:49 a.m. Para: 'Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)' Asunto: RE: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer I've seen this happen when there are dns resolution problems. You may want to verify that /etc/resolv.conf is setup correctly and that you are not having any issues with your dns servers. Aaron -----Original Message----- From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Moises Toporek Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 9:06 PM To: 'Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)' Subject: RE: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer Sorry I am new to linux. Well long is about 5 minutes, whenever I issue a useradd command or whenever I login with any user other than root. My system is a RHEL 5 -----Mensaje original----- De: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] En nombre de Cameron Simpson Enviado el: Lunes, 09 de Marzo de 2009 06:52 p.m. Para: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) Asunto: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer On 09Mar2009 12:56, Moises Toporek wrote: | Whenever I issue a command, it takes to long to answer or prompt me again. | Why? Maybe the shell is checking the $MAIL file, and NFS is involved? You may need to tell us more about you system. And how long is long? Time it. Is it always the same length? -- Cameron Simpson DoD#743 http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/ When was the last time a jet was sucked into a bird engine intake? And I certainly don't recall ever having a jet bounce off the windshield of my car. - bobb at vice.ico.tek.com (Bob Beauchaine) _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users __________ Informacisn de NOD32, revisisn 3922 (20090309) __________ Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system http://www.nod32.com _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users __________ Informacisn de NOD32, revisisn 3922 (20090309) __________ Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system http://www.nod32.com _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From abliss at brockport.edu Tue Mar 10 17:22:10 2009 From: abliss at brockport.edu (Aaron Bliss) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:22:10 -0400 Subject: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer In-Reply-To: <003a01c9a19e$1bd776e0$538664a0$@com.mx> References: <008d01c9a0e8$bf57f800$3e07e800$@com.mx> <20090310005153.GA19610@cskk.homeip.net> <010101c9a11c$62952eb0$27bf8c10$@com.mx> <001e01c9a17e$92bef870$b83ce950$@edu> <001601c9a194$8dd0e880$a972b980$@com.mx> <003a01c9a19e$1bd776e0$538664a0$@com.mx> Message-ID: <00d401c9a1a4$beb6a880$3c23f980$@edu> If you don?t have your own dns server, then you should be able to use your ISP?s dns server. Aaron From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Moises Toporek Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 12:35 PM To: 'Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)' Subject: RE: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer Really don?t know. A recomendation from a firend who knows more about linux I did a: Yum ?y install bind bind-chroot bind-utils bind-libs caching-nameserver to implement the dns. And change de resolv.conf file with IP 127.0.0.1 Regards, Mois?s Toporek Hop ____________________________________________________________________________ Crediamigo De: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] En nombre de J Pill Enviado el: Martes, 10 de Marzo de 2009 10:01 a.m. Para: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) Asunto: Re: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer Are in this file private IPs? Can you put here public DNS? On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Moises Toporek wrote: OK. But what should be in this file. I just have 2 lines search .... and nameserver .... Regards, Mois?s Toporek Hop ____________________________________________________________________________ Crediamigo -----Mensaje original----- De: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] En nombre de Aaron Bliss Enviado el: Martes, 10 de Marzo de 2009 06:49 a.m. Para: 'Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)' Asunto: RE: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer I've seen this happen when there are dns resolution problems. You may want to verify that /etc/resolv.conf is setup correctly and that you are not having any issues with your dns servers. Aaron -----Original Message----- From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Moises Toporek Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 9:06 PM To: 'Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)' Subject: RE: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer Sorry I am new to linux. Well long is about 5 minutes, whenever I issue a useradd command or whenever I login with any user other than root. My system is a RHEL 5 -----Mensaje original----- De: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] En nombre de Cameron Simpson Enviado el: Lunes, 09 de Marzo de 2009 06:52 p.m. Para: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) Asunto: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer On 09Mar2009 12:56, Moises Toporek wrote: | Whenever I issue a command, it takes to long to answer or prompt me again. | Why? Maybe the shell is checking the $MAIL file, and NFS is involved? You may need to tell us more about you system. And how long is long? Time it. Is it always the same length? -- Cameron Simpson DoD#743 http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/ When was the last time a jet was sucked into a bird engine intake? And I certainly don't recall ever having a jet bounce off the windshield of my car. - bobb at vice.ico.tek.com (Bob Beauchaine) _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users __________ Informacisn de NOD32, revisisn 3922 (20090309) __________ Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system http://www.nod32.com _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users __________ Informacisn de NOD32, revisisn 3922 (20090309) __________ Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system http://www.nod32.com _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jpilldev at gmail.com Tue Mar 10 23:08:12 2009 From: jpilldev at gmail.com (J Pill) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:08:12 -0500 Subject: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer In-Reply-To: <00d401c9a1a4$beb6a880$3c23f980$@edu> References: <008d01c9a0e8$bf57f800$3e07e800$@com.mx> <20090310005153.GA19610@cskk.homeip.net> <010101c9a11c$62952eb0$27bf8c10$@com.mx> <001e01c9a17e$92bef870$b83ce950$@edu> <001601c9a194$8dd0e880$a972b980$@com.mx> <003a01c9a19e$1bd776e0$538664a0$@com.mx> <00d401c9a1a4$beb6a880$3c23f980$@edu> Message-ID: Could be an solution, but... Is the DNS resolution the causes? On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Aaron Bliss wrote: > If you don?t have your own dns server, then you should be able to use > your ISP?s dns server. > > > > Aaron > > > > *From:* rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] > *On Behalf Of *Moises Toporek > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 10, 2009 12:35 PM > > *To:* 'Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)' > *Subject:* RE: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer > > > > Really don?t know. > > > > A recomendation from a firend who knows more about linux I did a: > > > > Yum ?y install bind bind-chroot bind-utils bind-libs caching-nameserver > to implement the dns. > > And change de resolv.conf file with IP 127.0.0.1 > > > > Regards, > > *Mois?s Toporek Hop* > > * > ____________________________________________________________________________ > * > > *Credi**amigo* > > > > *De:* rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] *En > nombre de *J Pill > *Enviado el:* Martes, 10 de Marzo de 2009 10:01 a.m. > *Para:* Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) > *Asunto:* Re: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer > > > > Are in this file private IPs? Can you put here public DNS? > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Moises Toporek < > mtoporek at crediamigo.com.mx> wrote: > > OK. But what should be in this file. I just have 2 lines search .... and > nameserver .... > Regards, > > Mois?s Toporek Hop > > ____________________________________________________________________________ > Crediamigo > > > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] En > > nombre de Aaron Bliss > Enviado el: Martes, 10 de Marzo de 2009 06:49 a.m. > > Para: 'Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)' > > Asunto: RE: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer > > > I've seen this happen when there are dns resolution problems. You may want > to verify that /etc/resolv.conf is setup correctly and that you are not > having any issues with your dns servers. > > Aaron > > -----Original Message----- > From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] > On > Behalf Of Moises Toporek > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 9:06 PM > To: 'Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)' > Subject: RE: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer > > Sorry I am new to linux. > > Well long is about 5 minutes, whenever I issue a useradd command or > whenever > I login with any user other than root. > > My system is a RHEL 5 > > > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] En > nombre de Cameron Simpson > Enviado el: Lunes, 09 de Marzo de 2009 06:52 p.m. > Para: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) > Asunto: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer > > On 09Mar2009 12:56, Moises Toporek wrote: > | Whenever I issue a command, it takes to long to answer or prompt me > again. > | Why? > > Maybe the shell is checking the $MAIL file, and NFS is involved? > You may need to tell us more about you system. > And how long is long? Time it. Is it always the same length? > -- > Cameron Simpson DoD#743 > http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/ > > When was the last time a jet was sucked into a bird engine intake? And I > certainly don't recall ever having a jet bounce off the windshield of my > car. > - bobb at vice.ico.tek.com (Bob Beauchaine) > > _______________________________________________ > rhn-users mailing list > rhn-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users > > __________ Informacisn de NOD32, revisisn 3922 (20090309) __________ > > Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system > http://www.nod32.com > > > _______________________________________________ > rhn-users mailing list > rhn-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users > > _______________________________________________ > rhn-users mailing list > rhn-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users > > __________ Informacisn de NOD32, revisisn 3922 (20090309) __________ > > Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system > http://www.nod32.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > rhn-users mailing list > rhn-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > rhn-users mailing list > rhn-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mtoporek at crediamigo.com.mx Tue Mar 10 23:23:37 2009 From: mtoporek at crediamigo.com.mx (Moises Toporek) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:23:37 -0600 Subject: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer In-Reply-To: References: <008d01c9a0e8$bf57f800$3e07e800$@com.mx> <20090310005153.GA19610@cskk.homeip.net> <010101c9a11c$62952eb0$27bf8c10$@com.mx> <001e01c9a17e$92bef870$b83ce950$@edu> <001601c9a194$8dd0e880$a972b980$@com.mx> <003a01c9a19e$1bd776e0$538664a0$@com.mx> <00d401c9a1a4$beb6a880$3c23f980$@edu> Message-ID: <010c01c9a1d7$3dc01990$b9404cb0$@com.mx> Well yes, part of it. The login time has been solved changing the dns entry in resolv.conf. But the useradd still taking to much time, apparently I have a lot of processes running that I wasn?t aware about. Mois?s Toporek Hop ____________________________________________________________________________ Crediamigo De: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] En nombre de J Pill Enviado el: Martes, 10 de Marzo de 2009 05:08 p.m. Para: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) Asunto: Re: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer Could be an solution, but... Is the DNS resolution the causes? On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Aaron Bliss wrote: If you don?t have your own dns server, then you should be able to use your ISP?s dns server. Aaron From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Moises Toporek Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 12:35 PM To: 'Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)' Subject: RE: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer Really don?t know. A recomendation from a firend who knows more about linux I did a: Yum ?y install bind bind-chroot bind-utils bind-libs caching-nameserver to implement the dns. And change de resolv.conf file with IP 127.0.0.1 Regards, Mois?s Toporek Hop ____________________________________________________________________________ Crediamigo De: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] En nombre de J Pill Enviado el: Martes, 10 de Marzo de 2009 10:01 a.m. Para: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) Asunto: Re: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer Are in this file private IPs? Can you put here public DNS? On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Moises Toporek wrote: OK. But what should be in this file. I just have 2 lines search .... and nameserver .... Regards, Mois?s Toporek Hop ____________________________________________________________________________ Crediamigo -----Mensaje original----- De: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] En nombre de Aaron Bliss Enviado el: Martes, 10 de Marzo de 2009 06:49 a.m. Para: 'Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)' Asunto: RE: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer I've seen this happen when there are dns resolution problems. You may want to verify that /etc/resolv.conf is setup correctly and that you are not having any issues with your dns servers. Aaron -----Original Message----- From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Moises Toporek Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 9:06 PM To: 'Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)' Subject: RE: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer Sorry I am new to linux. Well long is about 5 minutes, whenever I issue a useradd command or whenever I login with any user other than root. My system is a RHEL 5 -----Mensaje original----- De: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] En nombre de Cameron Simpson Enviado el: Lunes, 09 de Marzo de 2009 06:52 p.m. Para: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) Asunto: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer On 09Mar2009 12:56, Moises Toporek wrote: | Whenever I issue a command, it takes to long to answer or prompt me again. | Why? Maybe the shell is checking the $MAIL file, and NFS is involved? You may need to tell us more about you system. And how long is long? Time it. Is it always the same length? -- Cameron Simpson DoD#743 http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/ When was the last time a jet was sucked into a bird engine intake? And I certainly don't recall ever having a jet bounce off the windshield of my car. - bobb at vice.ico.tek.com (Bob Beauchaine) _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users __________ Informacisn de NOD32, revisisn 3922 (20090309) __________ Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system http://www.nod32.com _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users __________ Informacisn de NOD32, revisisn 3922 (20090309) __________ Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system http://www.nod32.com _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ronanian at annamaria.edu Wed Mar 11 14:14:22 2009 From: ronanian at annamaria.edu (Richard Onanian) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:14:22 -0400 Subject: [rhn-users] Can't subscribe RHEL5 to Base Software Channel Message-ID: <983C144328E1A843AD3FD9F2EDDD19DF2ACFC62056@AMCEXCHANGE.AMCRF.LOCAL> I have two RHEL5 systems and a bunch of RHEL4/RHEL3 systems. The older systems are all subscribed to their appropriate Base Software Channel, but I can't get the RHEL5 systems subscribed. I am pretty sure that I have available entitlements and subscriptions and such. When I go to the Software Channels page at https://rhn.redhat.com/rhn/systems/details/SystemChannels.do?sid= (SID deleted) it says "None - disable this service" for the current Base Channel. I can choose the correct Base Channel ("Red Hat Enterprise Linux (v. 5 for 32-bit x86)") from the drop-down list, but when I submit my choice by clicking the "Modify Base Channel" button, it reloads the same page showing "None - disable this service" again, and the system remains not subscribed to a Base Channel. A picture of the page, list, and button I'm talking about: http://s5.tinypic.com/2chru3m.jpg Choosing the base channel selected in that picture and clicking the "Modify Base Channel" just reloads the page with no action having been taken. What am I doing wrong? From jpilldev at gmail.com Wed Mar 11 14:21:54 2009 From: jpilldev at gmail.com (J Pill) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:21:54 -0500 Subject: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer In-Reply-To: <010c01c9a1d7$3dc01990$b9404cb0$@com.mx> References: <008d01c9a0e8$bf57f800$3e07e800$@com.mx> <20090310005153.GA19610@cskk.homeip.net> <010101c9a11c$62952eb0$27bf8c10$@com.mx> <001e01c9a17e$92bef870$b83ce950$@edu> <001601c9a194$8dd0e880$a972b980$@com.mx> <003a01c9a19e$1bd776e0$538664a0$@com.mx> <00d401c9a1a4$beb6a880$3c23f980$@edu> <010c01c9a1d7$3dc01990$b9404cb0$@com.mx> Message-ID: With command htop ypu can see the process statics, if doesn't with top. If you have unnecesary process, see the services that start with the system with the setup command -> services. On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Moises Toporek wrote: > Well yes, part of it. The login time has been solved changing the dns > entry in resolv.conf. But the useradd still taking to much time, apparently > I have a lot of processes running that I wasn?t aware about. > > > > *Mois?s Toporek Hop* > > * > ____________________________________________________________________________ > * > > *Credi**amigo* > > > > *De:* rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] *En > nombre de *J Pill > *Enviado el:* Martes, 10 de Marzo de 2009 05:08 p.m. > *Para:* Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) > *Asunto:* Re: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer > > > > Could be an solution, but... Is the DNS resolution the causes? > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Aaron Bliss > wrote: > > If you don?t have your own dns server, then you should be able to use your > ISP?s dns server. > > > > Aaron > > > > *From:* rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] > *On Behalf Of *Moises Toporek > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 10, 2009 12:35 PM > > > *To:* 'Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)' > *Subject:* RE: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer > > > > Really don?t know. > > > > A recomendation from a firend who knows more about linux I did a: > > > > Yum ?y install bind bind-chroot bind-utils bind-libs caching-nameserver > to implement the dns. > > And change de resolv.conf file with IP 127.0.0.1 > > > > Regards, > > *Mois?s Toporek Hop* > > * > ____________________________________________________________________________ > * > > *Credi**amigo* > > > > *De:* rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] *En > nombre de *J Pill > *Enviado el:* Martes, 10 de Marzo de 2009 10:01 a.m. > *Para:* Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) > *Asunto:* Re: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer > > > > Are in this file private IPs? Can you put here public DNS? > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Moises Toporek < > mtoporek at crediamigo.com.mx> wrote: > > OK. But what should be in this file. I just have 2 lines search .... and > nameserver .... > Regards, > > Mois?s Toporek Hop > > ____________________________________________________________________________ > Crediamigo > > > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] En > > nombre de Aaron Bliss > Enviado el: Martes, 10 de Marzo de 2009 06:49 a.m. > > Para: 'Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)' > > Asunto: RE: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer > > > I've seen this happen when there are dns resolution problems. You may want > to verify that /etc/resolv.conf is setup correctly and that you are not > having any issues with your dns servers. > > Aaron > > -----Original Message----- > From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] > On > Behalf Of Moises Toporek > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 9:06 PM > To: 'Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)' > Subject: RE: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer > > Sorry I am new to linux. > > Well long is about 5 minutes, whenever I issue a useradd command or > whenever > I login with any user other than root. > > My system is a RHEL 5 > > > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] En > nombre de Cameron Simpson > Enviado el: Lunes, 09 de Marzo de 2009 06:52 p.m. > Para: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) > Asunto: [rhn-users] Re: commands takes to long to answer > > On 09Mar2009 12:56, Moises Toporek wrote: > | Whenever I issue a command, it takes to long to answer or prompt me > again. > | Why? > > Maybe the shell is checking the $MAIL file, and NFS is involved? > You may need to tell us more about you system. > And how long is long? Time it. Is it always the same length? > -- > Cameron Simpson DoD#743 > http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/ > > When was the last time a jet was sucked into a bird engine intake? And I > certainly don't recall ever having a jet bounce off the windshield of my > car. > - bobb at vice.ico.tek.com (Bob Beauchaine) > > _______________________________________________ > rhn-users mailing list > rhn-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users > > __________ Informacisn de NOD32, revisisn 3922 (20090309) __________ > > Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system > http://www.nod32.com > > > _______________________________________________ > rhn-users mailing list > rhn-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users > > _______________________________________________ > rhn-users mailing list > rhn-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users > > __________ Informacisn de NOD32, revisisn 3922 (20090309) __________ > > Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system > http://www.nod32.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > rhn-users mailing list > rhn-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users > > > > > _______________________________________________ > rhn-users mailing list > rhn-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > rhn-users mailing list > rhn-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From cbarnard at rush.edu Fri Mar 13 18:09:12 2009 From: cbarnard at rush.edu (Christopher L. Barnard) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:09:12 -0500 Subject: [rhn-users] Re: Why do all of the files in /etc get changed every oncein a while? In-Reply-To: <000301c9a11c$466b6790$d34236b0$@edu> References: <1236634063.17026.156.camel@cbar-linux.rush.edu> <20090309234032.GA7162@cskk.homeip.net> <000301c9a11c$466b6790$d34236b0$@edu> Message-ID: <1236967752.17026.318.camel@cbar-linux.rush.edu> Solved. Yes, it was the inode creation/modification time (ctime), not mtime or atime. I had inadvertently configured tripwire to check /etc with ExcludeNone and all of the other filesystems as ReadOnly, which excludes c. That is why everything in /etc was alerting every time a full backup was done but no other filesystems did. -- Christopher Barnard -------------------------------------------------------------------------- comment your code as if the maintainer will be a homicidal maniac who knows where you live. From pjvendra at ncn.ca Sat Mar 14 20:01:44 2009 From: pjvendra at ncn.ca (pjvendra at ncn.ca) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:01:44 -0400 Subject: [rhn-users] AUTO: paul jvendra is out of the office Message-ID: I am out of the office until 03/18/2009. Note: This is an automated response to your message "rhn-users Digest, Vol 61, Issue 8" sent on 3/14/09 12:00:07 PM. This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away. Note: This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Note: Ce courrier ?lectronique est confidentiel et prot?g?. L'exp?diteur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) d?sign?(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier ?lectronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser imm?diatement, par retour de courrier ?lectronique ou par un autre moyen. From ptashraf at kfupm.edu.sa Mon Mar 16 16:17:08 2009 From: ptashraf at kfupm.edu.sa (P T Ashraf) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 08:17:08 -0800 Subject: [rhn-users] Re: rhn-users Digest, Vol 61, Issue 9 In-Reply-To: <20090315160006.A50A161919A@hormel.redhat.com> References: <20090315160006.A50A161919A@hormel.redhat.com> Message-ID: <49BE7B84.1070404@kfupm.edu.sa> rhn-users-request at redhat.com wrote: > Send rhn-users mailing list submissions to > rhn-users at redhat.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > rhn-users-request at redhat.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at > rhn-users-owner at redhat.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of rhn-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. AUTO: paul jvendra is out of the office (pjvendra at ncn.ca) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:01:44 -0400 > From: pjvendra at ncn.ca > Subject: [rhn-users] AUTO: paul jvendra is out of the office > To: rhn-users at redhat.com > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > > I am out of the office until 03/18/2009. > > > > > Note: This is an automated response to your message "rhn-users Digest, Vol > 61, Issue 8" sent on 3/14/09 12:00:07 PM. > > This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away. > > Note: This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender > does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or > copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an > intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, > please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. > > Note: Ce courrier ?lectronique est confidentiel et prot?g?. L'exp?diteur ne > renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, > utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par > une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) d?sign?(s) est interdite. > Si vous recevez ce courrier ?lectronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser > imm?diatement, par retour de courrier ?lectronique ou par un autre moyen. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > rhn-users mailing list > rhn-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users > > End of rhn-users Digest, Vol 61, Issue 9 > **************************************** > How can resolve the replication issue of IBM Tivoli ldap server in Redhat Linux Error code is 80 If anybody please inform Ashraf From Wahyu.Darmawan at ag-it.com Wed Mar 18 10:30:35 2009 From: Wahyu.Darmawan at ag-it.com (Wahyu Darmawan) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:30:35 +0700 Subject: [rhn-users] Subscription Number In-Reply-To: <49BE7B84.1070404@kfupm.edu.sa> References: <20090315160006.A50A161919A@hormel.redhat.com> <49BE7B84.1070404@kfupm.edu.sa> Message-ID: <0FE1B519D219B64A87E99E36202385450817AB15@svr-e2k7.ag-it.com> Hi all, I would ask. I just registered server with subscription number, but there was an error on hardware environment, and the vendor will be replaced with the newest one. So, what should I do to register the new machine? Thanks before. Rgds, Wahyu From donald.gourley at gmail.com Wed Mar 18 10:44:29 2009 From: donald.gourley at gmail.com (Don Gourley) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:44:29 +0000 Subject: [rhn-users] php 5.2 and additional repos Message-ID: <3ae2c0340903180344x74d8a01j1921a057edcdb530@mail.gmail.com> I am new the RHEL 5. We subscribed because we don't have any dedicated system admins and wanted to make administration of our servers as easy as possible. But RHEL doesn't have everything we need. In particular, I am very surprised that it doesn't include php 5.2, which many php apps are starting to require. What is the easiest way to install software like php 5.2 on RHEL 5 without updating virtually all of the system software? Can I just add a repository for yum, like maybe Fedora 10 (or perhaps an older version like 9 is more compatible with RHEL 5 core)? Or should it be a repo of sw built specifically for RHEL5? If so, are there any? thanks for any advice offered, -Don From jruel at herald.ca Wed Mar 18 10:50:58 2009 From: jruel at herald.ca (Jason Ruel) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 07:50:58 -0300 Subject: [rhn-users] Subscription Number References: <20090315160006.A50A161919A@hormel.redhat.com><49BE7B84.1070404@kfupm.edu.sa> <0FE1B519D219B64A87E99E36202385450817AB15@svr-e2k7.ag-it.com> Message-ID: <642DCA1CFED4B1488C3545C80ABB147101C95E@exchange.chronicleherald.herald.net> Hello, If I understand you correctly, you've installed RH on a server but will be re-installing it on new hardware, correct? If so, then log into the RedHat Network and delete the system profile for that system from your subscription list. When you go to re-install on the new hardware, then you should be able to use the subscription number again and it will re-register with RH Network again. Jason ________________________________ From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com on behalf of Wahyu Darmawan Sent: Wed 18/03/2009 7:30 AM To: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) Subject: [rhn-users] Subscription Number Hi all, I would ask. I just registered server with subscription number, but there was an error on hardware environment, and the vendor will be replaced with the newest one. So, what should I do to register the new machine? Thanks before. Rgds, Wahyu _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: winmail.dat Type: application/ms-tnef Size: 4152 bytes Desc: not available URL: From Wahyu.Darmawan at ag-it.com Wed Mar 18 13:17:05 2009 From: Wahyu.Darmawan at ag-it.com (Wahyu Darmawan) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:17:05 +0700 Subject: [rhn-users] Subscription Number In-Reply-To: <642DCA1CFED4B1488C3545C80ABB147101C95E@exchange.chronicleherald.herald.net> References: <20090315160006.A50A161919A@hormel.redhat.com><49BE7B84.1070404@kfupm.edu.sa> <0FE1B519D219B64A87E99E36202385450817AB15@svr-e2k7.ag-it.com>, <642DCA1CFED4B1488C3545C80ABB147101C95E@exchange.chronicleherald.herald.net> Message-ID: <0FE1B519D219B64A87E99E362023854508210771@svr-e2k7.ag-it.com> Hi... Thank you very much for the info.... Rgds, ________________________________________ From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Jason Ruel [jruel at herald.ca] Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 5:50 PM To: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) Subject: RE: [rhn-users] Subscription Number Hello, If I understand you correctly, you've installed RH on a server but will be re-installing it on new hardware, correct? If so, then log into the RedHat Network and delete the system profile for that system from your subscription list. When you go to re-install on the new hardware, then you should be able to use the subscription number again and it will re-register with RH Network again. Jason _____ From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com on behalf of Wahyu Darmawan Sent: Wed 18/03/2009 7:30 AM To: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) Subject: [rhn-users] Subscription Number Hi all, I would ask. I just registered server with subscription number, but there was an error on hardware environment, and the vendor will be replaced with the newest one. So, what should I do to register the new machine? Thanks before. Rgds, Wahyu _______________________________________________ rhn-users mailing list rhn-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users From bob.kepford at statecenter.com Wed Mar 18 16:50:24 2009 From: bob.kepford at statecenter.com (Bob Kepford) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:50:24 -0700 Subject: [rhn-users] php 5.2 and additional repos Message-ID: I have the same question as Topic #2 by don. I am new the RHEL 5. We subscribed because we don't have any > dedicated system admins and wanted to make administration of our > servers as easy as possible. But RHEL doesn't have everything we > need. In particular, I am very surprised that it doesn't include php > 5.2, which many php apps are starting to require. > > What is the easiest way to install software like php 5.2 on RHEL 5 > without updating virtually all of the system software? Can I just add > a repository for yum, like maybe Fedora 10 (or perhaps an older > version like 9 is more compatible with RHEL 5 core)? Or should it be > a repo of sw built specifically for RHEL5? If so, are there any? > > thanks for any advice offered, > -Don PHP 5.2 is quickly becoming the standard. There should be a way to manage this in RHEL. Your help is appreciated Bob On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:00 AM, wrote: > Send rhn-users mailing list submissions to > rhn-users at redhat.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > rhn-users-request at redhat.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at > rhn-users-owner at redhat.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of rhn-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Subscription Number (Wahyu Darmawan) > 2. php 5.2 and additional repos (Don Gourley) > 3. RE: Subscription Number (Jason Ruel) > 4. RE: Subscription Number (Wahyu Darmawan) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:30:35 +0700 > From: Wahyu Darmawan > Subject: [rhn-users] Subscription Number > To: "Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)" > > Message-ID: > <0FE1B519D219B64A87E99E36202385450817AB15 at svr-e2k7.ag-it.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Hi all, > I would ask. I just registered server with subscription number, but there > was an error on hardware environment, and the vendor will be replaced with > the newest one. > So, what should I do to register the new machine? > > Thanks before. > > > Rgds, > Wahyu > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:44:29 +0000 > From: Don Gourley > Subject: [rhn-users] php 5.2 and additional repos > To: rhn-users at redhat.com > Message-ID: > <3ae2c0340903180344x74d8a01j1921a057edcdb530 at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > I am new the RHEL 5. We subscribed because we don't have any > dedicated system admins and wanted to make administration of our > servers as easy as possible. But RHEL doesn't have everything we > need. In particular, I am very surprised that it doesn't include php > 5.2, which many php apps are starting to require. > > What is the easiest way to install software like php 5.2 on RHEL 5 > without updating virtually all of the system software? Can I just add > a repository for yum, like maybe Fedora 10 (or perhaps an older > version like 9 is more compatible with RHEL 5 core)? Or should it be > a repo of sw built specifically for RHEL5? If so, are there any? > > thanks for any advice offered, > -Don > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 07:50:58 -0300 > From: "Jason Ruel" > Subject: RE: [rhn-users] Subscription Number > To: "Discussions about Red Hat Network \(rhn.redhat.com\)" > > Message-ID: > < > 642DCA1CFED4B1488C3545C80ABB147101C95E at exchange.chronicleherald.herald.net > > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hello, > > If I understand you correctly, you've installed RH on a server but will be > re-installing it on new hardware, correct? > > If so, then log into the RedHat Network and delete the system profile for > that system from your subscription list. When you go to re-install on the > new hardware, then you should be able to use the subscription number again > and it will re-register with RH Network again. > > Jason > > ________________________________ > > From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com on behalf of Wahyu Darmawan > Sent: Wed 18/03/2009 7:30 AM > To: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) > Subject: [rhn-users] Subscription Number > > > > Hi all, > I would ask. I just registered server with subscription number, but there > was an error on hardware environment, and the vendor will be replaced with > the newest one. > So, what should I do to register the new machine? > > Thanks before. > > > Rgds, > Wahyu > > _______________________________________________ > rhn-users mailing list > rhn-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: not available > Type: application/ms-tnef > Size: 4152 bytes > Desc: not available > Url : > https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhn-users/attachments/20090318/282d6b6b/attachment.bin > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:17:05 +0700 > From: Wahyu Darmawan > Subject: RE: [rhn-users] Subscription Number > To: "Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)" > > Message-ID: > <0FE1B519D219B64A87E99E362023854508210771 at svr-e2k7.ag-it.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Hi... > Thank you very much for the info.... > > Rgds, > ________________________________________ > From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com [rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com] On > Behalf Of Jason Ruel [jruel at herald.ca] > Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 5:50 PM > To: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) > Subject: RE: [rhn-users] Subscription Number > > Hello, > > If I understand you correctly, you've installed RH on a server but will be > re-installing it on new hardware, correct? > > If so, then log into the RedHat Network and delete the system profile for > that system from your subscription list. When you go to re-install on the > new hardware, then you should be able to use the subscription number again > and it will re-register with RH Network again. > > Jason > > _____ > > From: rhn-users-bounces at redhat.com on behalf of Wahyu Darmawan > Sent: Wed 18/03/2009 7:30 AM > To: Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com) > Subject: [rhn-users] Subscription Number > > > > Hi all, > I would ask. I just registered server with subscription number, but there > was an error on hardware environment, and the vendor will be replaced with > the newest one. > So, what should I do to register the new machine? > > Thanks before. > > > Rgds, > Wahyu > > _______________________________________________ > rhn-users mailing list > rhn-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > rhn-users mailing list > rhn-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users > > End of rhn-users Digest, Vol 61, Issue 11 > ***************************************** > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From cbarnard at rush.edu Fri Mar 20 21:30:53 2009 From: cbarnard at rush.edu (Christopher L. Barnard) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:30:53 -0500 Subject: [rhn-users] how to get /r and /m in /etc/motd Message-ID: <1237584653.3393.151.camel@cbar-linux.rush.edu> My /etc/motd has both \r and \m in it, but it is printed verbatim on login. I'm guessing that these are `uname -r` and `uname -m`, but if I put those in the motd, even with the backquotes, it is still printed verbatim. Since the out-of-the-box RH distrtibution has \r and \m in the /etc/motd (or /etc/issue; I don't recall) there must be a way to get them expanded to their actual values. Has anyone managed to do this? -- Christopher Barnard -------------------------------------------------------------------------- comment your code as if the maintainer will be a homicidal maniac who knows where you live. From smooge at gmail.com Fri Mar 20 22:11:07 2009 From: smooge at gmail.com (Stephen John Smoogen) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:11:07 -0600 Subject: [rhn-users] how to get /r and /m in /etc/motd In-Reply-To: <1237584653.3393.151.camel@cbar-linux.rush.edu> References: <1237584653.3393.151.camel@cbar-linux.rush.edu> Message-ID: <80d7e4090903201511u185e6114v33dadfa095e693b9@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Christopher L. Barnard wrote: > My /etc/motd has both \r and \m in it, but it is printed verbatim on > login. ?I'm guessing that these are `uname -r` and `uname -m`, but if I > put those in the motd, even with the backquotes, it is still printed > verbatim. ?Since the out-of-the-box RH distrtibution has \r and \m in > the /etc/motd (or /etc/issue; I don't recall) there must be a way to get > them expanded to their actual values. ?Has anyone managed to do this? \r and \m are determined by the login program when it looks at /etc/issue. It does not look at /etc/motd in the same way. So I normally have /etc/issue with the \r and then if I have to have it in /etc/motd do a cron job that keeps it up to date. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" From inode0 at gmail.com Sun Mar 22 13:09:47 2009 From: inode0 at gmail.com (inode0) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 08:09:47 -0500 Subject: [rhn-users] Re: Disappearing xen guest subscriptions on 2008-10-22 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 10:38 AM, inode0 wrote: > I have a very simple RHN account with three systems. One of those is a > xen host with two guests. On 10-22 it appears that Red Hat removed the > base and child channel subscriptions from one of those guests. The > unsubscribe events are logged in the event history for that machine. > The only difference between these two guests is that the one that had > its subscriptions removed was turned off at the time of the event > while the one that was left unchanged was running at the time. > > Any chance someone could comment on what is going on with RHN? This happened again today. Why in the world RHN is unsubscribing this system remains a mystery. I'm getting a bit tired of it though. John From donald.gourley at gmail.com Mon Mar 23 11:57:34 2009 From: donald.gourley at gmail.com (Don Gourley) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:57:34 +0000 Subject: [rhn-users] php 5.2 and additional repos In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3ae2c0340903230457w7f962ab5x219140b653add5dc@mail.gmail.com> Bob, and anyone else trying to upgrade PHP on RHEL5: I found this repository: http://www.jasonlitka.com/yum-repository/ and used `yum update php` to get a working version of PHP 5.2 for my RHEL system. Now if I can figure out how to get the GD library in my PHP... -Don 2009/3/18 Bob Kepford : > I have the same question as Topic #2 by don. > >> I am new the RHEL 5. ?We subscribed because we don't have any >> dedicated system admins and wanted to make administration of our >> servers as easy as possible. ?But RHEL doesn't have everything we >> need. ?In particular, I am very surprised that it doesn't include php >> 5.2, which many php apps are starting to require. >> >> What is the easiest way to install software like php 5.2 on RHEL 5 >> without updating virtually all of the system software? ?Can I just add >> a repository for yum, like maybe Fedora 10 (or perhaps an older >> version like 9 is more compatible with RHEL 5 core)? ?Or should it be >> a repo of sw built specifically for RHEL5? ?If so, are there any? >> >> thanks for any advice offered, >> -Don > > PHP 5.2 is quickly becoming the standard. There should be a way to manage > this in RHEL. > > Your help is appreciated > > Bob From shoom013 at gmail.com Mon Mar 23 22:50:58 2009 From: shoom013 at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Zoran_Popovi=E6?=) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 23:50:58 +0100 Subject: [rhn-users] php 5.2 and additional repos In-Reply-To: <3ae2c0340903230457w7f962ab5x219140b653add5dc@mail.gmail.com> References: <3ae2c0340903230457w7f962ab5x219140b653add5dc@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <96b40cab0903231550y389bede8t733ae0a16854ed4f@mail.gmail.com> Once again, did anyone do any successful Xen or KVM on ia64 with HVM ? I need this desperately ... I have tried to make proof of concept for my company with RHEL 5.3 but there I got stuck with network drivers on guest machines - rtl8139 (realtek) simply does not work on Windows Server 2003 SP1/2 because there are no ia64 drivers, model=whatever does not change a thing in vif definition ... hours/days of work for nothing, but that is not a problem even closely as the bitter taste of knowing that mostly M$-oriented IT infrastructure here is taking over once again :(( please, help ... ZP. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From cbarnard at rush.edu Fri Mar 27 14:33:32 2009 From: cbarnard at rush.edu (Christopher L. Barnard) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:33:32 -0500 Subject: [rhn-users] a specific rpm --query mode. Message-ID: <1238164412.4358.191.camel@cbar-linux.rush.edu> I think an RPM is not used, so I want to delete it. But before I do I want to find out if any other RPMs that are installed rely upon it. I can use rpm --query --requires RPMNAME to find out what other RPMs must be installed for RPMNAME to work. But what I am looking for is a way to find out if other RPMs rely on RPMNAME being there. How would I do this? I do not see the option in the rpm man page or a google search... -- Christopher Barnard -------------------------------------------------------------------------- comment your code as if the maintainer will be a homicidal maniac who knows where you live. From smooge at gmail.com Fri Mar 27 15:54:39 2009 From: smooge at gmail.com (Stephen John Smoogen) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:54:39 -0600 Subject: [rhn-users] a specific rpm --query mode. In-Reply-To: <1238164412.4358.191.camel@cbar-linux.rush.edu> References: <1238164412.4358.191.camel@cbar-linux.rush.edu> Message-ID: <80d7e4090903270854n4444af4bre8c6045e2157d292@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Christopher L. Barnard wrote: > I think an RPM is not used, so I want to delete it. ?But before I do I > want to find out if any other RPMs that are installed rely upon it. ?I > can use rpm --query --requires RPMNAME to find out what other RPMs must > be installed for RPMNAME to work. ?But what I am looking for is a way to > find out if other RPMs rely on RPMNAME being there. ?How would I do > this? ?I do not see the option in the rpm man page or a google search... Well the real ugly way is rpm -e and see what complains :). There is the rpm -q --whatrequires which should help [smooge at bakeneko Desktop]$ rpm -q --whatrequires passwd usermode-1.99-3.x86_64 [smooge at bakeneko Desktop]$ rpm -q --whatprovides passwd passwd-0.76-2.fc11.x86_64 Hope this helps. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" From cbarnard at rush.edu Fri Mar 27 17:07:48 2009 From: cbarnard at rush.edu (Christopher L. Barnard) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:07:48 -0500 Subject: [rhn-users] a specific rpm --query mode. In-Reply-To: <80d7e4090903270854n4444af4bre8c6045e2157d292@mail.gmail.com> References: <1238164412.4358.191.camel@cbar-linux.rush.edu> <80d7e4090903270854n4444af4bre8c6045e2157d292@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1238173668.4358.217.camel@cbar-linux.rush.edu> On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 09:54 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Christopher L. Barnard > wrote: > > I think an RPM is not used, so I want to delete it. But before I do I > > want to find out if any other RPMs that are installed rely upon it. I > > can use rpm --query --requires RPMNAME to find out what other RPMs must > > be installed for RPMNAME to work. But what I am looking for is a way to > > find out if other RPMs rely on RPMNAME being there. How would I do > > this? I do not see the option in the rpm man page or a google search... > > Well the real ugly way is rpm -e and see what complains :). There is the > > rpm -q --whatrequires which should help > > [smooge at bakeneko Desktop]$ rpm -q --whatrequires passwd > usermode-1.99-3.x86_64 > [smooge at bakeneko Desktop]$ rpm -q --whatprovides passwd > passwd-0.76-2.fc11.x86_64 > > Hope this helps. > It looks like this does to some extent. I can write a script that does a '--whatrequires' for all of the files in the rpm I want to delete. It appears that rpm --query --whatprovides /fully/pathed/file/name and rpm --query --file /fully/pathed/file/name do exactly the same thing. Or am I missing something? Christopher From cbarnard at rush.edu Mon Mar 30 18:40:15 2009 From: cbarnard at rush.edu (Christopher L. Barnard) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:40:15 -0500 Subject: [rhn-users] Installing a package Message-ID: <1238438415.4358.278.camel@cbar-linux.rush.edu> I think this is a trivial problem... On a server that has gcc installed (also a fairly elderly RH3 server) asitest:~$ rpm --query --file /usr/bin/cc gcc-3.2.3-59 But on this server where I need to install gcc, [root at webdev] /root # up2date --install gcc-3.2.3-59 Fetching Obsoletes list for channel: rhel-i386-as-3... Fetching rpm headers... ######################################## Name Version Rel ---------------------------------------------------------- The following packages you requested were not found: gcc-3.2.3-59 I have also tried just 'up2date --install gcc' but with the same effect. I know gcc-3.2.3-59 exists, because it is installed on other boxes. I am thinking that the -59 at the end is the revision number (a la Sun patches) but 'up2date --install gcc.3.2.3' did not work either. BTW, I did register this box with the RHN... How do I get gcc installed? -- Christopher Barnard -------------------------------------------------------------------------- comment your code as if the maintainer will be a homicidal maniac who knows where you live. From smooge at gmail.com Mon Mar 30 18:45:52 2009 From: smooge at gmail.com (Stephen John Smoogen) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:45:52 -0600 Subject: [rhn-users] Installing a package In-Reply-To: <1238438415.4358.278.camel@cbar-linux.rush.edu> References: <1238438415.4358.278.camel@cbar-linux.rush.edu> Message-ID: <80d7e4090903301145x43a37074ie06e78acdbc7d299@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Christopher L. Barnard wrote: > I think this is a trivial problem... > > On a server that has gcc installed (also a fairly elderly RH3 server) > > asitest:~$ rpm --query --file /usr/bin/cc > gcc-3.2.3-59 > > But on this server where I need to install gcc, > [root at webdev] /root # up2date --install gcc-3.2.3-59 > > Fetching Obsoletes list for channel: rhel-i386-as-3... > > Fetching rpm headers... > ######################################## > > Name ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Version ? ? ? ?Rel > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > The following packages you requested were not found: > gcc-3.2.3-59 > up2date does not like version numbers.. and gives cryptic answers when it doesn't find stuff. First of all see if oyu have it in any channels up2date --showall | grep gcc if it doesn't show up.. look on RHN to see that you have the box registered with the appropriate RHEL-3/4 channels it needs. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" From lincoln.fessenden at jefferson.edu Mon Mar 30 18:55:25 2009 From: lincoln.fessenden at jefferson.edu (Lincoln Fessenden) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:55:25 -0400 Subject: [rhn-users] Installing a package In-Reply-To: <1238438415.4358.278.camel@cbar-linux.rush.edu> References: <1238438415.4358.278.camel@cbar-linux.rush.edu> Message-ID: <49D1159D.6080209@jefferson.edu> Christopher L. Barnard wrote: > I think this is a trivial problem... > > On a server that has gcc installed (also a fairly elderly RH3 server) > > asitest:~$ rpm --query --file /usr/bin/cc > gcc-3.2.3-59 > > But on this server where I need to install gcc, > [root at webdev] /root # up2date --install gcc-3.2.3-59 > > Fetching Obsoletes list for channel: rhel-i386-as-3... > > Fetching rpm headers... > ######################################## > > Name Version Rel > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > The following packages you requested were not found: > gcc-3.2.3-59 > > I have also tried just 'up2date --install gcc' but with the same effect. > I know gcc-3.2.3-59 exists, because it is installed on other boxes. I > am thinking that the -59 at the end is the revision number (a la Sun > patches) but 'up2date --install gcc.3.2.3' did not work either. > > BTW, I did register this box with the RHN... > > How do I get gcc installed? > Hrmm... "up2date --showall | grep gcc" Will show you which gcc packages are available in the repository. Chances are good that the version of gcc you are looking for doesn;'t exist there, however, there should be an updated one (slightly different revision number) available. Hope that helps. -- Lincoln Fessenden Jeff-IT Linux Systems Administrator From cbarnard at rush.edu Mon Mar 30 20:30:12 2009 From: cbarnard at rush.edu (Christopher L. Barnard) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:30:12 -0500 Subject: [rhn-users] Installing a package In-Reply-To: <80d7e4090903301145x43a37074ie06e78acdbc7d299@mail.gmail.com> References: <1238438415.4358.278.camel@cbar-linux.rush.edu> <80d7e4090903301145x43a37074ie06e78acdbc7d299@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1238445012.4358.293.camel@cbar-linux.rush.edu> nope. From an up2date --showall I see that I needed to add "i386" to the end of the rpm name... [root at webdev] /root # up2date --showall | grep gcc [...] gcc-3.2.3-59.i386 [...] However, I still cannot add it... [root at webdev] /root # up2date --install gcc-3.2.3-59.i386 Fetching Obsoletes list for channel: rhel-i386-as-3... Fetching rpm headers... ######################################## Name Version Rel ---------------------------------------------------------- The following packages you requested were not found: gcc-3.2.3-59.i386 [root at webdev] /root # On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 12:45 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Christopher L. Barnard > wrote: > > I think this is a trivial problem... > > > > On a server that has gcc installed (also a fairly elderly RH3 server) > > > > asitest:~$ rpm --query --file /usr/bin/cc > > gcc-3.2.3-59 > > > > But on this server where I need to install gcc, > > [root at webdev] /root # up2date --install gcc-3.2.3-59 > > > > Fetching Obsoletes list for channel: rhel-i386-as-3... > > > > Fetching rpm headers... > > ######################################## > > > > Name Version Rel > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > The following packages you requested were not found: > > gcc-3.2.3-59 > > > > up2date does not like version numbers.. and gives cryptic answers when > it doesn't find stuff. First of all see if oyu have it in any channels > > up2date --showall | grep gcc > > if it doesn't show up.. look on RHN to see that you have the box > registered with the appropriate RHEL-3/4 channels it needs. > > > From cbarnard at rush.edu Mon Mar 30 20:58:32 2009 From: cbarnard at rush.edu (Christopher L. Barnard) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:58:32 -0500 Subject: [rhn-users] Installing a package In-Reply-To: <1238445012.4358.293.camel@cbar-linux.rush.edu> References: <1238438415.4358.278.camel@cbar-linux.rush.edu> <80d7e4090903301145x43a37074ie06e78acdbc7d299@mail.gmail.com> <1238445012.4358.293.camel@cbar-linux.rush.edu> Message-ID: <1238446712.4358.294.camel@cbar-linux.rush.edu> Never mind. The RHN site was having problems this morning. Everything is working correctly now. Christopher On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 15:30 -0500, Christopher L. Barnard wrote: > nope. From an up2date --showall I see that I needed to add "i386" to > the end of the rpm name... > > [root at webdev] /root # up2date --showall | grep gcc > [...] > gcc-3.2.3-59.i386 > [...] > > However, I still cannot add it... > > [root at webdev] /root # up2date --install gcc-3.2.3-59.i386 > > Fetching Obsoletes list for channel: rhel-i386-as-3... > > Fetching rpm headers... > ######################################## > > Name Version Rel > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > The following packages you requested were not found: > gcc-3.2.3-59.i386 > [root at webdev] /root # > > > On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 12:45 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Christopher L. Barnard > > wrote: > > > I think this is a trivial problem... > > > > > > On a server that has gcc installed (also a fairly elderly RH3 server) > > > > > > asitest:~$ rpm --query --file /usr/bin/cc > > > gcc-3.2.3-59 > > > > > > But on this server where I need to install gcc, > > > [root at webdev] /root # up2date --install gcc-3.2.3-59 > > > > > > Fetching Obsoletes list for channel: rhel-i386-as-3... > > > > > > Fetching rpm headers... > > > ######################################## > > > > > > Name Version Rel > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > The following packages you requested were not found: > > > gcc-3.2.3-59 > > > > > > > up2date does not like version numbers.. and gives cryptic answers when > > it doesn't find stuff. First of all see if oyu have it in any channels > > > > up2date --showall | grep gcc > > > > if it doesn't show up.. look on RHN to see that you have the box > > registered with the appropriate RHEL-3/4 channels it needs. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > rhn-users mailing list > rhn-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users From lincoln.fessenden at jefferson.edu Mon Mar 30 21:39:11 2009 From: lincoln.fessenden at jefferson.edu (Lincoln Fessenden) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:39:11 -0400 Subject: [rhn-users] Installing a package In-Reply-To: <1238445012.4358.293.camel@cbar-linux.rush.edu> References: <1238438415.4358.278.camel@cbar-linux.rush.edu> <80d7e4090903301145x43a37074ie06e78acdbc7d299@mail.gmail.com> <1238445012.4358.293.camel@cbar-linux.rush.edu> Message-ID: <49D13BFF.40700@jefferson.edu> Christopher L. Barnard wrote: > nope. From an up2date --showall I see that I needed to add "i386" to > the end of the rpm name... > > [root at webdev] /root # up2date --showall | grep gcc > [...] > gcc-3.2.3-59.i386 > [...] > > However, I still cannot add it... If that is the only gcc that is listed, just do an "up2date gcc". -- Lincoln Fessenden Linux Systems Administrator 215-850-9556 From florfoto at gmail.com Mon Mar 30 22:51:43 2009 From: florfoto at gmail.com (Alba) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:51:43 -0300 Subject: [rhn-users] Problems registering a Full Virtualized virtual machine Message-ID: <59cb8b5e0903301551j425617e8k57835adf74dd6f9d@mail.gmail.com> Hello, I'm trying to register in RHN a Full Virtualized Xen DomU. I can register it following the procedure in: http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/docs/DOC-9933 But it doesn't appear as a Virtual System in Systems -> Virtual Systems in RHN. It's register as a Dom0 instead of a DomU. It happens with one of two DomUs. I don't know what is the difference between them. I checked files in /etc/sysconfig/rhn/virt and everything seem to be ok. Where else could I check? The Dom0 and DomUs are RHEL5.3. Any help will be welcome. Thanks in advance From peter at simons-rock.edu Tue Mar 31 15:20:13 2009 From: peter at simons-rock.edu (Peter C. Lai) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:20:13 -0400 Subject: [rhn-users] Problems registering a Full Virtualized virtual machine In-Reply-To: <59cb8b5e0903301551j425617e8k57835adf74dd6f9d@mail.gmail.com> References: <59cb8b5e0903301551j425617e8k57835adf74dd6f9d@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090331152013.GA13398@cesium.hyperfine.info> are the 2 domUs part of the same dom0? If the answer is "no" then it is possible it's a dom0 issue (i.e. the dom0 isn't assigned a virtualization entitltement and/or doesn't have the virtualization host packages installed). On 2009-03-30 07:51:43PM -0300, Alba wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to register in RHN a Full Virtualized Xen DomU. > I can register it following the procedure in: > http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/docs/DOC-9933 > > But it doesn't appear as a Virtual System in Systems -> Virtual > Systems in RHN. It's register as a Dom0 instead of a DomU. > > It happens with one of two DomUs. I don't know what is the difference > between them. > > I checked files in /etc/sysconfig/rhn/virt and everything seem to be ok. > > Where else could I check? > > The Dom0 and DomUs are RHEL5.3. > > Any help will be welcome. > > Thanks in advance > > _______________________________________________ > rhn-users mailing list > rhn-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users -- =========================================================== Peter C. Lai | Bard College at Simon's Rock Systems Administrator | 84 Alford Rd. Information Technology Svcs. | Gt. Barrington, MA 01230 USA peter AT simons-rock.edu | (413) 528-7428 =========================================================== From florfoto at gmail.com Tue Mar 31 15:27:20 2009 From: florfoto at gmail.com (Alba) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:27:20 -0300 Subject: [rhn-users] Problems registering a Full Virtualized virtual machine In-Reply-To: <20090331152013.GA13398@cesium.hyperfine.info> References: <59cb8b5e0903301551j425617e8k57835adf74dd6f9d@mail.gmail.com> <20090331152013.GA13398@cesium.hyperfine.info> Message-ID: <59cb8b5e0903310827h78ff7cf9veacad4586f7f8102@mail.gmail.com> Both DomUs are part of the same Dom0. Dom0 has the Virtualization entitlement and virtualization packages installed. Thanks for your time. On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Peter C. Lai wrote: > are the 2 domUs part of the same dom0? If the answer is "no" then it is > possible it's a dom0 issue (i.e. the dom0 isn't assigned a virtualization > entitltement and/or doesn't have the virtualization host packages installed). > > On 2009-03-30 07:51:43PM -0300, Alba wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to register in RHN a Full Virtualized Xen DomU. >> I can register it following the procedure in: >> http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/docs/DOC-9933 >> >> But it doesn't appear as a Virtual System in Systems -> Virtual >> Systems in RHN. It's register as a Dom0 instead of a DomU. >> >> It happens with one of two DomUs. I don't know what is the difference >> between them. >> >> I checked files in /etc/sysconfig/rhn/virt and everything seem to be ok. >> >> Where else could I check? >> >> The Dom0 and DomUs are RHEL5.3. >> >> Any help will be welcome. >> >> Thanks in advance >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rhn-users mailing list >> rhn-users at redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users > > -- > =========================================================== > Peter C. Lai ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | Bard College at Simon's Rock > Systems Administrator ? ? ? ?| 84 Alford Rd. > Information Technology Svcs. | Gt. Barrington, MA 01230 USA > peter AT simons-rock.edu ? ? | (413) 528-7428 > =========================================================== > > _______________________________________________ > rhn-users mailing list > rhn-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users > From pjvendra at ncn.ca Tue Mar 31 20:01:45 2009 From: pjvendra at ncn.ca (pjvendra at ncn.ca) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:01:45 -0400 Subject: [rhn-users] AUTO: paul jvendra is out of the office Message-ID: I am out of the office until 04/01/2009. Note: This is an automated response to your message "rhn-users Digest, Vol 61, Issue 19" sent on 3/31/09 11:27:42 AM. This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away. Note: This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Note: Ce courrier ?lectronique est confidentiel et prot?g?. L'exp?diteur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) d?sign?(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier ?lectronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser imm?diatement, par retour de courrier ?lectronique ou par un autre moyen.