[scl.org] Minutes from CentOS SIG sync-up meeting on #centos-devel (2014-12-03)
Radek Vokal
rvokal at redhat.com
Thu Dec 4 08:53:21 UTC 2014
On 12/03/2014 07:35 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
> Initial content:
> * there were concerns what will happen with downstream collections
> already in git.c.o -- we'll let the existing SCLs as they are now, at
> least for beginning
> * the sig can/could/should provide them as a build (not priority for
> beginning)
> * we should see what the biggest consumers need -- openshift origins
> or foreman
> * since there is quite big demand for php and mariadb, we will begin
> with those two collections
>
> New scl-utils:
> * next version of scl-utils will offer environment modules, but it is
> not ready so far
>
> Access to git/koji:
> * since nobody objected against proposed git structure, we'll start
> with what is proposed at
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Hhorak/Draft/centos-scl-git-proposal
> * in order to start we need to submit a bug with login, gpg public
> key, email and request git/koji access for both services in parallel
> * in koji, alphacc is executioner on the koji setup, but mikem,
> imcleod_ and MerlinTHP might be able to help as well
>
> Bug reporting:
> * we do not know how to track bugs so far
Honzo, so what's the connection now to scl.org? Will build collections
appear there eventually? Can the bug tracker be hosted there? I know we
had a testing askbot instance at scl.org - should that be used for user
feedback?
Radek
>
> Full meeting log attached.
>
> Conversation will continue at
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg.
>
> Honza
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SCLorg mailing list
> SCLorg at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg
>
More information about the SCLorg
mailing list