[scl.org] Suspicious collections in the listing all collections

[Dmitrijs Milajevs]

This is the default text for unpublished repos:

*Unpublished*: These SCLs are *not* listed publicly, so users browsing the
SoftwareCollections.org index will not see these packages or be able to
install them. This is for collections that are currently in development
prior to release to the public, or for packages that are for your personal
use.

In my case the collection is in development, so I would not share it to
avoid confusion.

--
Dima


On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 5:17 AM, Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com>
wrote:

>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Honza Horak" <hhorak at redhat.com>
> > To: sclorg at redhat.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2014 12:18:04 PM
> > Subject: [scl.org] Suspicious collections in the listing all collections
> >
> > Hi, I've found some items on
> > https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/ that I find rather
> > confusing, all from different reason. Please, help me identify false
> > positive before I report that as issues:
> >
> > https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/dimazest/nlp/
> > "Unpublished: These SCLs are not listed publicly..." -- well, they are
> > publicly listed, since I see them when I'm not logged in.
> >
> > https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/mstuchli/CoprCI/
> > This is actually not software collection, right? Why it is listed on
> > scl.org?
> >
> > https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/mbooth/eclipse-luna/
> > This copr has no builds assigned, or at least I see no '(not synced)'
> > there. Shouldn't we list only properly synced collections?
> >
> > Maybe some if those is expected or desired, I could just not understand
> > the reason. Thanks for feedback.
> >
> > Honza
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SCLorg mailing list
> > SCLorg at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg
> >
> Not sure about the first one. We don't see link to repo, but then why is
> it there? They guy
> shouldn't ask for hosting on scl.org if it's private.
>
> What about the second, Matej?
> --
> Marcela
>
> _______________________________________________
> SCLorg mailing list
> SCLorg at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/sclorg/attachments/20140904/68dc4784/attachment.htm>