[scl.org] [CentOS-devel] CBS build tags and git branches names for SCL

[Honza Horak]

On 03/11/2015 06:29 PM, Campbell, Stuart I. wrote:
>> >So, having this changed workflow on my mind, the branches/tags set
>> >becomes more complicated... Let's see (using 'rhscl' for identifying
>> >collections that are part of RHSCL -- not sure how much it will confuse
>> >users):
>> >
>> >final tags (and repositories):
>> >sclo6-release
>> >sclo6-testing
>> >sclo7-release
>> >sclo7-testing
>> >sclo6-rhscl-release
>> >sclo6-rhscl-testing
>> >sclo6-rhscl-future
>> >sclo7-rhscl-release
>> >sclo7-rhscl-testing
>> >sclo7-rhscl-future
>> >
>> >build tags for e.g. collection rh-mariadb100:
>> >sclo6-el6-rh-mariadb100-build
>> >sclo7-el7-rh-mariadb100-build
>> >sclo6-el6-rhscl-future-rh-mariadb100-build
>> >sclo7-el7-rhscl-future-rh-mariadb100-build
>> >(We need to keep the disttag (el6, el7) in the name as agreed from the
>> >beginning for all SIGs)
>> >
>> >build targets:
>> >sclo6-el6-rh-mariadb100
>> >sclo6-el6-rh-mariadb100-rhscl-future
>> >sclo7-el7-rh-mariadb100
>> >sclo7-el7-rh-mariadb100-rhscl-future
>> >
>> >git branches under sclo/ project:
>> >sclo6-rh-mariadb100
>> >sclo7-rh-mariadb100
>> >
>> >git branches under rpms/ project:
>> >sclo6-rh-mariadb100
>> >sclo7-rh-mariadb100
>> >
>> >Again, will be glad for any feedback for this..
>> >
>> >Honza
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >SCLorg mailing list
>> >SCLorg at redhat.com
>> >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg
>> >
> I asked around a few users at my work place (large national lab) and they didn’t seem to be confused at all about the ‘rhscl’ naming.  People pretty much guessed that these were collections that were part of rhscl.  Although the ‘sclo’ naming did seem to confuse pretty much everyone - but that’s a different issue.

Thanks for the quick feedback!

Honza